Latest Breaking News

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)

74. My goodness, you are quite the little Authoritarian-tin-pot-dictator-wanna-be, aren't you?

Reply to graham4anything (Reply #69)

Sun Oct 7, 2012, 01:28 PM

Oct 2012

and people who spew da constitution da constitution have never read the true meanings of what was written.

Feel free to educate us. We're waiting.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

99 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Court Rules N.Y. Shooting Victim Can Sue Gun Maker, Distributor [View all] Hissyspit Oct 2012 OP

Groovy! graham4anything Oct 2012 #1

I fully agree gopiscrap Oct 2012 #2

definitely sue the NRA +10000 wordpix Oct 2012 #6

Sure the NRA only has about 4.5 million glacierbay Oct 2012 #19

You mean the "free-riders" who support and benefit from NRA's Hoyt Oct 2012 #81

Distributor, I can see. boppers Oct 2012 #3

Depends. Might be all responsible. AtheistCrusader Oct 2012 #4

I agree with you goclark Oct 2012 #44

I don't see why gun manufacturers should have more protection than others CreekDog Oct 2012 #35

The reason for the protection glacierbay Oct 2012 #36

ironically to protect people from other people with guns CreekDog Oct 2012 #37

No glacierbay Oct 2012 #38

No, I mean the guns --they're being sold to protect people from other people with guns CreekDog Oct 2012 #39

Wharfgarble. n/t PavePusher Oct 2012 #40

It they let everyone do this to every company all commerce would stand still Mojorabbit Oct 2012 #45

You can try to sue a car company or a car salesman for your car wreck. boppers Oct 2012 #46

It is along the same line I think Mojorabbit Oct 2012 #48

That's already how it works. boppers Oct 2012 #55

I was going to bring this suit abumbyanyothername Oct 2012 #5

So now I can sue Anheuser-Busch because a drunk ran me off the road? NT Trunk Monkey Oct 2012 #7

I personally think that a bar should be sued if there is an accident after graham4anything Oct 2012 #11

but the question is backwoodsbob Oct 2012 #16

The question was- was Joe Paterno guilty because of Sandusky? IMHO YES YES YES graham4anything Oct 2012 #20

I am not 100% sure about this Trunk Monkey Oct 2012 #18

Compassion... bitchkitty Oct 2012 #53

which means you lack compassion Trunk Monkey Oct 2012 #60

If he hit an artery, bitchkitty Oct 2012 #85

One can sue tobacco companies. Why not those who make and MARKET lethal weapons? Hoyt Oct 2012 #82

This message was self-deleted by its author reality24 Oct 2012 #8

Post removed Post removed Oct 2012 #9

I have a question gejohnston Oct 2012 #10

FFL licenses are (theoretically) held by scrupulous dealers. boppers Oct 2012 #47

better question is, why is the ATF turning a blind eye to it? gejohnston Oct 2012 #50

Because it would put most gun sales places out of business. boppers Oct 2012 #56

not buying it gejohnston Oct 2012 #58

"A Buffalo man who was shot..." greiner3 Oct 2012 #12

Good. Everyone in the food chain of a gun crime should answer for the crime. onehandle Oct 2012 #13

Very good. Kingofalldems Oct 2012 #14

Horseshit. krispos42 Oct 2012 #15

WOW fightthegoodfightnow Oct 2012 #17

The difference, is, of course, that I'm right and you're wrong. krispos42 Oct 2012 #21

Difference is that's an Argument fightthegoodfightnow Oct 2012 #25

Since this... PavePusher Oct 2012 #42

actually in many places across the country, parents are held responsible for minors crimes graham4anything Oct 2012 #52

And in NY, does the liquor store there parents purchased the booze... krispos42 Oct 2012 #61

So let me see if I'm getting this right. glacierbay Oct 2012 #64

You are an NRA talking point police man. You distract every anti-gun thread there is graham4anything Oct 2012 #65

Dodge. You did not address anything presented to you. PavePusher Oct 2012 #66

I believe in the right to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness & all are equal graham4anything Oct 2012 #69

There's still a question pending glacierbay Oct 2012 #70

I will let you keep a gun in your house, provided in advance I know you have one graham4anything Oct 2012 #72

I'm sorry glacierbay Oct 2012 #73

I have a freedom of choice to not enter your home with stockpiled guns graham4anything Oct 2012 #77

I never said you don't have the right to not enter my home glacierbay Oct 2012 #79

The NRA provides help and resources for the people on trial with guns graham4anything Oct 2012 #84

I see I'm not going to get a straight answer from you glacierbay Oct 2012 #87

This one is either deliberately distractive/disruptive, or not tracking well. PavePusher Oct 2012 #91

What he may be trying to do is get one of us to say something inflammatory glacierbay Oct 2012 #92

Interesting legal question here primavera Oct 2012 #93

you are exactly correct- Can I make this a new thread asking this question? graham4anything Oct 2012 #96

Lol! By all means, I'd be curious to see the responses. - n/t primavera Oct 2012 #97

No glacierbay Oct 2012 #98

Actually, that's not true primavera Oct 2012 #99

My goodness, you are quite the little Authoritarian-tin-pot-dictator-wanna-be, aren't you? PavePusher Oct 2012 #74

There's a question pending glacierbay Oct 2012 #68

It's called "proximate cause" versus "cause in fact"... primavera Oct 2012 #94

Before you call others irrational, check your own lips for froth. n/t Scootaloo Oct 2012 #57

Another great example of why the anti-gunnies fails aikoaiko Oct 2012 #24

Guns are Doing What? fightthegoodfightnow Oct 2012 #27

no gun ever saved anyone, the gunnies are always with the NRA talking points graham4anything Oct 2012 #71

I know youre frustrated with losing this culture war aikoaiko Oct 2012 #75

It's not my reason for being however- graham4anything Oct 2012 #78

Because the vast majority of crime doesn't happen at home glacierbay Oct 2012 #83

But if someone has a gun going into a place, a scanner letting someone know graham4anything Oct 2012 #86

WTF are you talking about glacierbay Oct 2012 #88

If there are no guns inside, then your gun is not needed to stop a gun attack. graham4anything Oct 2012 #89

Your not even making any sense now glacierbay Oct 2012 #90

Not true and you know it glacierbay Oct 2012 #76

Wharfgarble. n/t PavePusher Oct 2012 #41

Wow, a lot of people aren't reading past the headline. JoeyT Oct 2012 #22

defendants knowingly violated federal gun laws" if true they might have a case. aikoaiko Oct 2012 #23

So by extrapolating this ruling sarisataka Oct 2012 #26

Amusing fightthegoodfightnow Oct 2012 #28

While I do oppose sale tracking sarisataka Oct 2012 #29

Thank You fightthegoodfightnow Oct 2012 #30

I've had some spirited debates with you also glacierbay Oct 2012 #31

No Need to Aologize- No Offense Taken fightthegoodfightnow Oct 2012 #32

That is rather uncouth sarisataka Oct 2012 #34

There is an enormous difference... PavePusher Oct 2012 #43

We track people who buy explosives and nuclear materials. boppers Oct 2012 #49

"suspected criminals" and "lawful Citizens", you seem to be confused on those terms. PavePusher Oct 2012 #59

They'll have to prove a link between the manufacturer, distributor, dealer, seller and shooter NickB79 Oct 2012 #33

The BATF needs to start revoking licenses, and putting more people in jail for selling guns. boppers Oct 2012 #54

good! if our elected officials dont have the guts bowens43 Oct 2012 #51

That was already tried glacierbay Oct 2012 #63

"death merchants"? PavePusher Oct 2012 #67

Thank you for posting this here. I like when gun policy talk comes out of the gungeon. aikoaiko Oct 2012 #62

Blame the money path rebuke Oct 2012 #80

Did the gun malfunction? Operate in some way other than how it was intended? 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #95