HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Health Illinois cannot ma... » Reply #14

Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Sat Sep 22, 2012, 12:58 AM

14. Well, Which is it?

"finding no evidence that the drugs had ever been denied on religious grounds, and that the law was not neutral since it was designed to target religious objectors. "

If the drugs had never been denied on religious grounds, how could there be religious objectors to target? If it was designed to target religious objectors, how could that mean that there never would be any religious objectors? AND how could there be denials on religious grounds if there was a law in force that said they couldn't object? Ambiguous much?

Now there will be denials based on religious objections, count on it. What a revolving door this is.

Don't serve in public health if you can't deliver it. Damn your religion.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 19 replies Author Time Post
Judi Lynn Sep 2012 OP
MsPithy Sep 2012 #1
freshwest Sep 2012 #10
jonesgirl Sep 2012 #2
Judi Lynn Sep 2012 #5
McCamy Taylor Sep 2012 #3
GreenPartyVoter Sep 2012 #7
kestrel91316 Sep 2012 #4
freshwest Sep 2012 #11
uppityperson Sep 2012 #6
DallasNE Sep 2012 #8
freshwest Sep 2012 #12
kiranon Sep 2012 #9
freshwest Sep 2012 #13
waddirum Sep 2012 #17
LineNew Reply Well, Which is it?
defacto7 Sep 2012 #14
sakabatou Sep 2012 #15
judesedit Sep 2012 #16
uppityperson Sep 2012 #19
davsand Sep 2012 #18
Please login to view edit histories.