HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Health Illinois cannot ma... » Reply #8
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Fri Sep 21, 2012, 11:15 PM

8. I Don't Understand This Ruling At All

When a legal drug cannot be purchased then the patient is being denied a medical option that is completely legal. It seems to me that if a pharmacist refused to sell a product in inventory that it should be grounds for firing for cause rather than supported by a court of law. Frankly, I would have thought the pharmacist would have signed an oath to dispense all legal drugs for which a party had a legal prescription. This ruling looks to violate the Establishment Clause in the First Amendment where the pharmacist is establishing his/her religion over the customer. Like I say, I can see no legal basis for such a ruling.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 19 replies Author Time Post
Judi Lynn Sep 2012 OP
MsPithy Sep 2012 #1
freshwest Sep 2012 #10
jonesgirl Sep 2012 #2
Judi Lynn Sep 2012 #5
McCamy Taylor Sep 2012 #3
GreenPartyVoter Sep 2012 #7
kestrel91316 Sep 2012 #4
freshwest Sep 2012 #11
uppityperson Sep 2012 #6
LineNew Reply I Don't Understand This Ruling At All
DallasNE Sep 2012 #8
freshwest Sep 2012 #12
kiranon Sep 2012 #9
freshwest Sep 2012 #13
waddirum Sep 2012 #17
defacto7 Sep 2012 #14
sakabatou Sep 2012 #15
judesedit Sep 2012 #16
uppityperson Sep 2012 #19
davsand Sep 2012 #18
Please login to view edit histories.