Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hunter

(38,302 posts)
6. Words have meaning...
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 12:16 PM
Jan 2012
"But the study, to be published soon in the International Journal of Cancer, fell short of establishing a causal link between the higher incidence of leukemia, a type of blood cancer, and living near nuclear power plants."

At least the parent source isn't woo: http://english.inserm.fr

The only nuclear health studies that ever come up with hard numbers involve very significant radiation exposures: open air nuclear attacks and bomb tests, Chernobyl (and soon to be Fukushima), medical x-rays and radiation, that sort of thing... and even with those clear radiation exposures there are an abundance of very bad or even fraudulent studies either exaggerating the harm or minimizing it.

From my personal experiences, many of the "studies" surrounding the defunct Rancho Seco Nuclear Power Plant in California were a crap fling. There did seem to be a statistical signal in a few of them, but even those results could better be attributed to ag chemical runoff and similar factors. Nuclear power plants don't exist in isolation from other toxic human activities.

This paper seems to be another, "Hey, check this out, we might have found something..." It'll be interesting to look at the source when it's published.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Child Leukaemia Doubles N...»Reply #6