Latest Breaking News

RitchieRich

(292 posts)

28. Gee, you guys must be the most popular 13 year old girls in your Jr. High school

Reply to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #23)

Wed Sep 19, 2012, 01:20 PM

Sep 2012

Ok, that was fun.
Seriously though, I was implying a question that I would appreciate some real thought or response to.

If it is presupposed that any variation from a rigid list of opinions constitutes grounds for being demonized, how is any meaningful dialogue supposed to occur? Or, is that not the goal? If the goal is to just congratulate yourself on agreeing with yourself, well, you could just squat over a mirror and have at it.

I'm also wondering what the lack of DNA means. Does that imply that he was further away than claimed (therefore, not self-defense)?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

52 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trayvon Martin's DNA not found on George Zimmerman's gun, forensic tests say [View all] kpete Sep 2012 OP

k&r obamanut2012 Sep 2012 #1

I hope DUers will identify the conservative/NRA/anti-Trayvon talking points that are sure to follow CreekDog Sep 2012 #2

A Witch!! RitchieRich Sep 2012 #6

"Decenter"?? Seriously??? Oh wait, I meant "seriesly". kestrel91316 Sep 2012 #8

I don't think Richie Rich went to public schools ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #17

Close... RitchieRich Sep 2012 #22

But what schools did you attend? ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #23

Gee, you guys must be the most popular 13 year old girls in your Jr. High school RitchieRich Sep 2012 #28

I concurred with your concern (in my own way) further down ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #30

I suppose it means that it was unlikely that he touched or contacted the gun daleo Sep 2012 #49

*snicker* n/t crim son Sep 2012 #48

No, I was talking about posters who post "talking points" CreekDog Sep 2012 #11

Truth Ash_F Sep 2012 #46

Umm, do you mean "DISSENTERS"? Wow, a great way to start off...Ritchie. Ecumenist Sep 2012 #35

go heaven05 Sep 2012 #42

I think the correct spelling is "decanter" JustABozoOnThisBus Sep 2012 #52

We are ready for the infidels and heretics with stones, pitchforks, stout hearts and closed minds! ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #14

No evidence? brush Sep 2012 #26

By itself, that is proof of homicide not murder ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #29

The Delicate Flowers bongbong Sep 2012 #20

K&R nt avebury Sep 2012 #3

Can we lock this guy up already? DireStrike Sep 2012 #4

He is locked up. robinlynne Sep 2012 #12

I believe he is out ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #15

Out brush Sep 2012 #27

They did try Scairp Sep 2012 #34

I heaven05 Sep 2012 #5

The world knows. It's the too many Americans who refuse... TheMadMonk Sep 2012 #40

Has Zimmerman ever claimed that Trayvon Martin had his hands on the gun? (nt) enough Sep 2012 #7

I believe that is why they tested it. JRLeft Sep 2012 #9

That does not say Martin was reaching for the weapon ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #16

Post removed Post removed Sep 2012 #18

There are so many stories, which one are you citing? Many have not said that. ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #19

The "he" in that sentence means Zimmerman, not Martin. TheWraith Sep 2012 #21

HE SAID IT, "Professor". He actually said it. Wow, Obfuscate much? I wonder how you would Ecumenist Sep 2012 #36

You might want to read Post #21 at a minimum ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #39

Depends which of several versions of what happened you believe ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #10

yes. robinlynne Sep 2012 #13

Yes. Zoeisright Sep 2012 #31

Yeah, Zimmerman is a proven Cha Sep 2012 #37

That is kind of strange pediatricmedic Sep 2012 #24

Except Zimmerman stalked Martin before he killed him. sakabatou Sep 2012 #25

Chasing down an unarmed black kid and killing him isn't a hate crime? Zoeisright Sep 2012 #32

Not in this case. -..__... Sep 2012 #38

YOU! heaven05 Sep 2012 #43

I'll take your opinion on advisement after you posted the Stormfront pic of Martin CreekDog Sep 2012 #44

I keep reminding myself....... korak Sep 2012 #33

Ah, but.... Canuckistanian Sep 2012 #41

That doesn't prove anything madokie Sep 2012 #45

I agree - It doesn't shed any new light on the case slackmaster Sep 2012 #47

How do you take DNA from a gun? Remmah2 Sep 2012 #50

You do it the same way you remove DNA from everything else. ManiacJoe Sep 2012 #51