Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

24601

(3,958 posts)

6. That's OK by me. Given all that she's been through, I just that don't believe she would put her

Reply to HereSince1628 (Reply #4)

Wed Jan 11, 2012, 11:50 PM

Jan 2012

reputation on the line by going public and being so forceful without the confidence she was telling the truth. And it's not a matter of nuanced ambiguity or right or wrong intelligence about a foreign power. Taking out a scientist would require a presidential finding and it's improbable that it would slip his mind.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Clinton: US Had No Role In Killing Iran Scientist [View all] Purveyor Jan 2012 OP

FarsNews: Israeli Source: Assassination of Iranian Scientist Joint Operation by Mossad, MKO DCBob Jan 2012 #1

This message was self-deleted by its author HereSince1628 Jan 2012 #2

I disagree. If we had a role the Secretary of State would not have commented or would have said 24601 Jan 2012 #3

This message was self-deleted by its author HereSince1628 Jan 2012 #4

That's OK by me. Given all that she's been through, I just that don't believe she would put her 24601 Jan 2012 #6

"I want to categorically deny any United States involvement..." unkachuck Jan 2012 #5

It's possible that even IF the US had something to do with it fujiyama Jan 2012 #7

I don't think we had a role in the killing, and I also bet that Israel had no role in the killing. MADem Jan 2012 #8