Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

navarth

(5,927 posts)
87. I had nothing to do with that. When I serve on a jury
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 05:36 PM
Sep 2012

I will vote to hide a post that uses excessive ad hominem, not facts I dislike.

I STILL question your motives. You still haven't answered. I'd really like to know.

Did he just join the Republican party? gateley Sep 2012 #1
Unfortunately, it isn't a stretch. JDPriestly Sep 2012 #8
Very well stated. dixiegrrrrl Sep 2012 #29
You know, you're right. And after reading your post, I agree. gateley Sep 2012 #32
You seem to have lost sight of the entire charade. randome Sep 2012 #33
Uh....... Wild Thing Sep 2012 #36
well, that is one point of view mitchtv Sep 2012 #49
"His work for Wikileaks has nothing to do with that." Yeah, sure. Comrade Grumpy Sep 2012 #57
If the women's claims are true, he's a rapist, not a boorish lover. pnwmom Sep 2012 #79
So the entire Military Industrial Complex goes after an alleged rapist. navarth Sep 2012 #103
Where is this MIC you speak of? randome Sep 2012 #106
Do you need to see warships as proof? navarth Sep 2012 #110
What he and Wikileaks proved to us all is that... randome Sep 2012 #111
I think the terminology 'conspiracy theory' is navarth Sep 2012 #112
Speaking only for myself, I find the subject fascinating. randome Sep 2012 #114
No, just the Swedish justice system. n/t pnwmom Sep 2012 #107
and you know this absolutely? navarth Sep 2012 #113
I know it just as absolutely as you "know" pnwmom Sep 2012 #116
okay then, in other words, navarth Sep 2012 #119
I don't put Obama and Bush in the same category of trustworthiness. pnwmom Sep 2012 #123
+1000. nt awoke_in_2003 Sep 2012 #38
Post removed Post removed Sep 2012 #83
This post was alerted on! Tick Tock! ohiosmith Sep 2012 #93
What a mzmolly Sep 2012 #2
Sorry. Socal31 Sep 2012 #3
Good point. Dems to Win Sep 2012 #75
Jumped...the...shark n/t orwell Sep 2012 #4
Short simple and to the point. Agreed. Love your user name -- when I sign up for a grocery store Dems to Win Sep 2012 #72
oh ffs, not this shit again. Joe Shlabotnik Sep 2012 #5
A big ditto to your post Joe! SoapBox Sep 2012 #6
I've been cautious in my judgment of Assange davidthegnome Sep 2012 #7
I disagree. He is just pointing out that the US should do unto others as it would have others JDPriestly Sep 2012 #9
I agree with the idea of a universal code davidthegnome Sep 2012 #12
EXACTLY!!! SkyDaddy7 Sep 2012 #31
Good response, indeed. I support universal principles, but I have no respect for Assange Dems to Win Sep 2012 #74
an intelligent repsonse. Swagman Sep 2012 #18
Sigh. The headline is dishonest. We don't know that Assange wrote that tweet. Also, it was retracted Hissyspit Sep 2012 #14
... the official WikiLeaks Twitter feed ... is generally presumed to be operated by Assange ... struggle4progress Sep 2012 #53
I posted that. Duh. Hissyspit Sep 2012 #104
There's good reason to presume Assange controls the Twitter feed: struggle4progress Sep 2012 #105
Yes, the best journalism is presumption-based, not fact-based. Hissyspit Sep 2012 #125
I WISH he was irrelevant. He still gets media coverage and DU threads. I'm tired of the creep, too Dems to Win Sep 2012 #71
A narcissist is exactly what he is. Everything's always about HIM. pnwmom Sep 2012 #78
. mzmolly Sep 2012 #90
This guy was a hero of sorts to many not that long ago, but he seems to be losing supporters octothorpe Sep 2012 #124
I like this man less and less every time he opens his mouth. DeltaLitProf Sep 2012 #10
That's all the easier when the yellow press... JackRiddler Sep 2012 #16
I hope you blame those who published them as well in that case Swagman Sep 2012 #19
Indian Express? Say no more! longship Sep 2012 #11
A nod's as good as a wink to a blind bat. nt awoke_in_2003 Sep 2012 #39
Well, here are some other sources: struggle4progress Sep 2012 #48
Hmmm, didn't I see pretty much this same post in GD... ljm2002 Sep 2012 #13
Jury voted to hide it tama Sep 2012 #15
Nice try, but I posted this here in LBN before the jury hid my other OP struggle4progress Sep 2012 #37
Yes, on second thought you must have tama Sep 2012 #40
Assangists support Assange on free speech grounds -- then censor his critics struggle4progress Sep 2012 #58
You throw that to me tama Sep 2012 #61
"Assangists" navarth Sep 2012 #101
in that case I've just become disgusted by the jury service and will never Swagman Sep 2012 #20
this occurred to me when I heard the news Swagman Sep 2012 #17
This is the dumbest and craziest thing Assange has ever said. He needs to keep his trap shut. nt ladjf Sep 2012 #21
Life on the lam is eating away at his brain. rucky Sep 2012 #22
and it is just going to get worse. He's barely begun his self-imprisonment in the embassy Dems to Win Sep 2012 #73
The tenor of most replies here shows that posters BlueMTexpat Sep 2012 #23
agree navarth Sep 2012 #30
expecting better was your first mistake.. frylock Sep 2012 #46
That's what gets me navarth Sep 2012 #92
Guilty ... GeorgeGist Sep 2012 #24
Those people have zero credibility - who cares what they say? George II Sep 2012 #25
Clever headline - guilt by association. dipsydoodle Sep 2012 #26
... "I am the heart and soul of this organization, its founder, philosopher, spokesperson, original struggle4progress Sep 2012 #35
I am a corrupt moron flying jumbo jets loaded with entire nations, says Julian Assange struggle4progress Sep 2012 #41
You gotta love that article---how one's drunk tweets from England hit the Aussies mid-day....nt msanthrope Sep 2012 #42
"They'll believe we're real journalists if we get hammered and post dumb shizz!" struggle4progress Sep 2012 #45
... the official WikiLeaks Twitter feed ... is generally presumed to be operated by Assange ... struggle4progress Sep 2012 #43
DU rec...nt SidDithers Sep 2012 #27
I stayed out of the Assange worship leftynyc Sep 2012 #28
+1 Rare for me, too Dems to Win Sep 2012 #70
Daniel Ellsberg said in 2010 navarth Sep 2012 #34
Wikileaks is cool. Assange is not. randome Sep 2012 #50
realtive coolness is irrelevant navarth Sep 2012 #51
Trolls? The contortions and conspiracy hoops you guys have to jump through to keep from... Tarheel_Dem Sep 2012 #55
contortions and conspiracy hoops? navarth Sep 2012 #64
Translation = Governments should be held accountable. Julian Assange? Not so much. Tarheel_Dem Sep 2012 #66
Thank you for putting words in my mouth navarth Sep 2012 #67
Frankly, I think he should be put away so he's not a danger to himself or others, but that's just me Tarheel_Dem Sep 2012 #68
please explain how he is a danger to himself or others navarth Sep 2012 #69
Assangists support Assange on free speech grounds -- then censor his critics struggle4progress Sep 2012 #59
pfft navarth Sep 2012 #65
Jury used to hide facts DUers dislike struggle4progress Sep 2012 #85
I had nothing to do with that. When I serve on a jury navarth Sep 2012 #87
So? Ellsburg wouldn't say that the Libya attack had anything to do with Wikileaks. pnwmom Sep 2012 #80
WTF? navarth Sep 2012 #82
Why does Assange have to go to Sweden before being extradited here and black bagged? Dems to Win Sep 2012 #86
At this point all he's got to do is walk out of that embassy in London. navarth Sep 2012 #88
Why didn't it happen when Assange was on bail in the UK, living at his friend's mansion? Dems to Win Sep 2012 #91
I agree. If we were going to extradite, it would be simpler straight from the UK. pnwmom Sep 2012 #95
ok. if you're sincere navarth Sep 2012 #98
Sweden is also a US ally. Why would the US be willing to interfere with the Swedish justice system Dems to Win Sep 2012 #117
I also would be willing to look at any links navarth Sep 2012 #118
Pretty damn callous: Dems to Win Sep 2012 #122
What the hell does the Libya attack have to do with Daniel Ellsburg? You tell me. pnwmom Sep 2012 #94
My reference to Ellsberg navarth Sep 2012 #99
There isn't a personal vendetta on DU. There are simply some people here pnwmom Sep 2012 #108
On the contrary navarth Sep 2012 #109
No one can provide proof of the innocent people he hurt when he released the pnwmom Sep 2012 #115
okay then. navarth Sep 2012 #120
Narcissists tend to attract both hero-worship and vitriol. pnwmom Sep 2012 #121
He's hiding from having his poor performance as a lover made public. randome Sep 2012 #96
What a disappointing post navarth Sep 2012 #100
WikiLeaks' Lamest Claim Ever: Benghazi Embassy Violence Linked To U.K. Threat To Arrest Assange struggle4progress Sep 2012 #44
GOLDSTEIN!!1 frylock Sep 2012 #47
Can't we all chip in and buy this mf'er a remote island so we never have to hear from him again? Tarheel_Dem Sep 2012 #52
I'm guessing the Swedes will deport him to Australia after they acquit him struggle4progress Sep 2012 #54
Yes, but that'll mean we'll still have to hear his name occasionally. I'd prefer he just went away, Tarheel_Dem Sep 2012 #56
After they acquit him? Comrade Grumpy Sep 2012 #60
If you prefer "I'm guessing the Swedes will deport him to Australia after they convict him" then struggle4progress Sep 2012 #63
Assange and Bacile, 2 peas in a pod Dems to Win Sep 2012 #62
Discouraging how many in this thread 1. Don't know the definition of "tacit" harun Sep 2012 #76
The US gave no approval to these attacks, tacit or otherwise. pnwmom Sep 2012 #81
The US took the position: "this is a bilateral issue between Ecuador and the United Kingdom" struggle4progress Sep 2012 #84
What I find discouraging davidthegnome Sep 2012 #89
It's not always about you Julian... JohnnyRingo Sep 2012 #77
Sweden + UK > Ecaudor Embassy + Assange does not = Movie + Mob > USA Embassy. freshwest Sep 2012 #97
This guy is JUST so full of himself, isn't he? nt WeekendWarrior Sep 2012 #102
Great guy. nt greyl Sep 2012 #126
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»WikiLeaks' Julian Assange...»Reply #87