Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Top U.S. military officer called Pastor Terry Jones, urged to withdraw support for film [View all]onenote
(42,695 posts)27. Most of the posts that cite the First Amendment don't ignore the responsibilities
but they make the point that those rights don't mean much if you can be prosecuted for exercising them. Should people exercise their first amendment rights responsibly? Sure. Should the state be free to decide what constitutes reasonable exercise of first amendment rights? Only to the most limited extent possible. The original "fighting words" case held that calling someone a "God-damned racketeer" and a "fascist" wasn't protected speech and the person uttering those words could be arrested. Fortunately, the fighting words doctrine has been narrowed since then, but I would hope you would agree that arresting people for their words, or even for the reaction that their words evoke from others, is dangerous territory.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Top U.S. military officer called Pastor Terry Jones, urged to withdraw support for film [View all]
Hissyspit
Sep 2012
OP
snooper, accurate analysis. One need not quiver in fear of religious nuts after all nt
msongs
Sep 2012
#4
Well I guess they are getting worse at it, that's the definition of failure right?
snooper2
Sep 2012
#15
LOL, you are a funny one...Let me know when you find KKKarl Rove's boarding pass
snooper2
Sep 2012
#20
the backgrounds were okay, but the costumes were lame and the jokes were flat, non-existent..
snooper2
Sep 2012
#70
you may want to bring yourself up to speed before dropping the CT bomb with such invective
frylock
Sep 2012
#29
You're not saying that the people that actually carried out the attack on the embassy were
onenote
Sep 2012
#19
Yes. It is. Virginia v. Black, Snyder v. Phelps. Hate speech is protected. nt
msanthrope
Sep 2012
#44
If I go into a republican town hall meeting wearing an Obama button and burn a US flag
onenote
Sep 2012
#18
Stand in at a busy corner sidewalk and yell racial epithets for three hours. It's free speech...
LanternWaste
Sep 2012
#21
No shit, I was thinking the same thing. This is beyond crazy. I don't know what to call it.
Poll_Blind
Sep 2012
#10
Most of the posts that cite the First Amendment don't ignore the responsibilities
onenote
Sep 2012
#27
That would certainly take care of the need for a separate flag burning amendment
onenote
Sep 2012
#35