Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(42,695 posts)
27. Most of the posts that cite the First Amendment don't ignore the responsibilities
Wed Sep 12, 2012, 05:12 PM
Sep 2012

but they make the point that those rights don't mean much if you can be prosecuted for exercising them. Should people exercise their first amendment rights responsibly? Sure. Should the state be free to decide what constitutes reasonable exercise of first amendment rights? Only to the most limited extent possible. The original "fighting words" case held that calling someone a "God-damned racketeer" and a "fascist" wasn't protected speech and the person uttering those words could be arrested. Fortunately, the fighting words doctrine has been narrowed since then, but I would hope you would agree that arresting people for their words, or even for the reaction that their words evoke from others, is dangerous territory.

i think it is time for cindyperry2010 Sep 2012 #1
Um, no...this is still a semi free country... snooper2 Sep 2012 #3
snooper, accurate analysis. One need not quiver in fear of religious nuts after all nt msongs Sep 2012 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Sep 2012 #8
I don't know what kind of conspiracy theory you've got cooking in your head.. snooper2 Sep 2012 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Sep 2012 #12
Well I guess they are getting worse at it, that's the definition of failure right? snooper2 Sep 2012 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Sep 2012 #17
LOL, you are a funny one...Let me know when you find KKKarl Rove's boarding pass snooper2 Sep 2012 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Sep 2012 #36
Thank you Thank you! snooper2 Sep 2012 #62
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Sep 2012 #67
the backgrounds were okay, but the costumes were lame and the jokes were flat, non-existent.. snooper2 Sep 2012 #70
you may want to bring yourself up to speed before dropping the CT bomb with such invective frylock Sep 2012 #29
When I saw Sir Mix A Lot, I first thought of the Robot Chicken parody Tyrs WolfDaemon Sep 2012 #32
I hadn't seen that, that's pretty damn funny thanks for that... Volaris Sep 2012 #49
You're not saying that the people that actually carried out the attack on the embassy were onenote Sep 2012 #19
oh my god you are over the top pasto76 Sep 2012 #28
Are you saying Al Q or some other terrorist org made the film? Generic Other Sep 2012 #65
Wrong. Intentionally inciting violence is illegal. Zoeisright Sep 2012 #69
post an OP when somebody is charged... snooper2 Sep 2012 #71
so by using MrDiaz Sep 2012 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Sep 2012 #14
should we MrDiaz Sep 2012 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Sep 2012 #40
Isn't that why there's such as thing as Civil Suits? Volaris Sep 2012 #50
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Sep 2012 #59
lol MrDiaz Sep 2012 #51
Wow where have I heard these words before? Missycim Sep 2012 #53
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Sep 2012 #60
No lets get as wacko as them? Missycim Sep 2012 #61
hate speech is not protected by A1 frylock Sep 2012 #30
Yes. It is. Virginia v. Black, Snyder v. Phelps. Hate speech is protected. nt msanthrope Sep 2012 #44
Whats your definition of Hate speech? I bet it differs from Missycim Sep 2012 #54
i don't make the definitions.. frylock Sep 2012 #64
who are you to tell me to run along? Missycim Sep 2012 #66
Not at all. David__77 Sep 2012 #13
Yeah, I wonder how that will work out Patiod Sep 2012 #2
so... MrDiaz Sep 2012 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Sep 2012 #16
If I go into a republican town hall meeting wearing an Obama button and burn a US flag onenote Sep 2012 #18
nope MrDiaz Sep 2012 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Sep 2012 #37
care to explain or are you only capable of name calling? onenote Sep 2012 #41
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Sep 2012 #47
Sounds exactly like the events that Missycim Sep 2012 #55
so you believe MrDiaz Sep 2012 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Sep 2012 #38
umm. MrDiaz Sep 2012 #52
Stand in at a busy corner sidewalk and yell racial epithets for three hours. It's free speech... LanternWaste Sep 2012 #21
i truly detest the smug sense of self satisfaction some people get.. frylock Sep 2012 #31
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Sep 2012 #39
Well, hate speech is protected by the first amendment. msanthrope Sep 2012 #45
We are now in bizarro world brentspeak Sep 2012 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Sep 2012 #9
No shit, I was thinking the same thing. This is beyond crazy. I don't know what to call it. Poll_Blind Sep 2012 #10
Just ask the General what freedoms I am allowed to employ ok? Missycim Sep 2012 #56
If all you can think of is defending First Amendment Rights oldsarge54 Sep 2012 #23
Most of the posts that cite the First Amendment don't ignore the responsibilities onenote Sep 2012 #27
I would Agree oldsarge54 Sep 2012 #33
That would certainly take care of the need for a separate flag burning amendment onenote Sep 2012 #35
Or oldsarge54 Sep 2012 #42
If this was done. They likely feel this could blow up even bigger Thrill Sep 2012 #24
Jones needs to go to Libya to explain his support for the movie. alfredo Sep 2012 #34
What is your real problem oldsarge54 Sep 2012 #43
Am I going to get jailed? ripcord Sep 2012 #46
General Boykin? Canuckistanian Sep 2012 #48
There's a law about inciting violence, right? polichick Sep 2012 #57
Oh give me a freakin break! davidn3600 Sep 2012 #72
I'm sure Terry Jones is loving this publicity JustABozoOnThisBus Sep 2012 #58
Shocked at those who think criticising / mocking a religion is hate speech askeptic Sep 2012 #63
I wish there was a hell so Jones could burn in it. Zoeisright Sep 2012 #68
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Top U.S. military officer...»Reply #27