HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Administration urges terr... » Reply #7
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Response to lib2DaBone (Reply #3)

Wed Sep 12, 2012, 12:29 AM

7. Yeah, I did notice that......

...and it used to bother me a lot. That is until I reached the only conclusion that's possible.

- He couldn't stop it if he wanted to. Not and stay alive..........



The Purpose of War According to George Orwell (1984)

The primary aim of modern warfare is to use up the products of the machine without raising the general standard of living. Ever since the end of the nineteenth century, the problem of what to do with the surplus of consumption goods has been latent in industrial society. From the moment when the machine first made its appearance it was clear to all thinking people that the need for human drudgery, and therefore to a great extent for human inequality, had disappeared.

If the machine were used deliberately for that end, hunger, overwork, dirt, illiteracy, and disease could be eliminated within a few generations. And in fact, without being used for any such purpose, but by a sort of automatic process by producing wealth which it was sometimes impossible not to distribute the machine did raise the living standards of the average human being very greatly over a period of about fifty years at the end of the nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth centuries. But it was also clear that an all-round increase in wealth threatened the destruction indeed, in some sense was the destruction of a hierarchical society.

In a world in which everyone worked short hours, had enough to eat, lived in a house with a bathroom and a refrigerator, and possessed a motor-car or even an aeroplane, the most obvious and perhaps the most important form of inequality would already have disappeared. If it once became general, wealth would confer no distinction. It was possible, no doubt, to imagine a society in which wealth, in the sense of personal possessions and luxuries, should be evenly distributed, while power remained in the hands of a small privileged caste.

But in practice such a society could not long remain stable. For if leisure and security were enjoyed by all alike, the great mass of human beings who are normally stupefied by poverty would become literate and would learn to think for themselves; and when once they had done this, they would sooner or later realize that the privileged minority had no function, and they would sweep it away. In the long run, a hierarchical society was only possible on a basis of poverty and ignorance.

MORE

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 19 replies Author Time Post
choie Sep 2012 OP
OnyxCollie Sep 2012 #1
Solly Mack Sep 2012 #2
lib2DaBone Sep 2012 #3
choie Sep 2012 #5
The Roux Comes First Sep 2012 #11
CRH Sep 2012 #16
LineLineReply Yeah, I did notice that......
DeSwiss Sep 2012 #7
freshwest Sep 2012 #12
Nihil Sep 2012 #17
part man all 86 Sep 2012 #4
DeSwiss Sep 2012 #8
olddad56 Sep 2012 #9
Township75 Sep 2012 #6
bbgrunt Sep 2012 #10
awoke_in_2003 Sep 2012 #13
a2liberal Sep 2012 #14
blkmusclmachine Sep 2012 #15
dreamnightwind Sep 2012 #18
LineNew Reply ^
Wilms Sep 2012 #19
Please login to view edit histories.