Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Judge rules that poker isn’t gambling under federal law [View all]AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)14. You can do online poker against human opponents.
And yes, it is slightly different, in that you have to 'read' their betting habits, but it can be done. You don't need to see your opponent to play.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Dictionary definition and legal definition are not always the same thing.
AtheistCrusader
Aug 2012
#27
The "free" bit is usually read as "free to impose a puritanical way of life on others."
harmonicon
Aug 2012
#11