HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Judge rules that poker is... » Reply #8
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Response to Newsjock (Original post)

Tue Aug 21, 2012, 11:50 PM

8. this judge is going rogue in his old age

Is Judge Jack B Weinstein Right about Child Porn?

Last Friday's NY Times reports that Judge Jack B. Weinstein, who sits in the United States District Court in Brooklyn, has twice thrown out convictions that would have ensured that the man spend at least five years behind bars. He has pledged to break protocol and inform the next jury about the mandatory prison sentence that the charges carry. And he recently declared that the man, who is awaiting a new trial, did not need an electronic ankle bracelet because he posed "no risk to society."

There is little public sympathy, for collectors of child pornography. Yet across the country, an increasing number of federal judges have come to their defense, criticizing changes to sentencing laws that have effectively quadrupled their average prison term over the last decade.

Last week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated a 20-year child pornography sentence by ruling that the sentencing guidelines for such cases, "unless applied with great care, can lead to unreasonable sentences." The decision noted that the recommended sentences for looking at pictures of children being sexually abused sometimes eclipse those for actually sexually abusing a child.

Judge Weinstein has gone to extraordinary lengths to challenge the strict punishments, issuing a series of rulings that directly attack the mandatory five-year prison sentence faced by defendants charged with receiving child pornography.
"I don't approve of child pornography, obviously," he said in an interview this week. But, he also said, he does not believe that those who view the images, as opposed to producing or selling them, present a threat to children.

"We're destroying lives unnecessarily," he said. "At the most, they should be receiving treatment and supervision."

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/my-mother-my-father-my-money/201005/is-judge-jack-b-weinstein-right-about-child-porn

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 37 replies Author Time Post
Newsjock Aug 2012 OP
DJFrey Aug 2012 #1
kurt_cagle Aug 2012 #5
lunatica Aug 2012 #16
wysimdnwyg Aug 2012 #20
William Seger Aug 2012 #18
AtheistCrusader Aug 2012 #13
lunatica Aug 2012 #17
AtheistCrusader Aug 2012 #27
cthulu2016 Aug 2012 #25
ZombieHorde Aug 2012 #31
kestrel91316 Aug 2012 #2
oberliner Aug 2012 #3
ManiacJoe Aug 2012 #24
oberliner Aug 2012 #33
AtheistCrusader Aug 2012 #28
oberliner Aug 2012 #32
OnlinePoker Aug 2012 #4
harmonicon Aug 2012 #11
closeupready Aug 2012 #23
DJ13 Aug 2012 #6
Lucky Luciano Aug 2012 #7
LineReply this judge is going rogue in his old age
Mosby Aug 2012 #8
Proletariatprincess Aug 2012 #12
defacto7 Aug 2012 #9
AtheistCrusader Aug 2012 #14
TrogL Aug 2012 #10
awoke_in_2003 Aug 2012 #15
JTFrog Aug 2012 #19
Poll_Blind Aug 2012 #21
brooklynite Aug 2012 #34
Javaman Aug 2012 #22
GodlessBiker Aug 2012 #29
Javaman Aug 2012 #30
GodlessBiker Aug 2012 #35
Javaman Aug 2012 #37
ManiacJoe Aug 2012 #36
Kingofalldems Aug 2012 #26
Please login to view edit histories.