Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Assange will be refused safe passage even if Ecuador grants asylum - Foreign Office [View all]JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)if they did, that the sex was not consensual.
This boils down to he said, she said in the worst way.
What evidence other than the verbal testimony of each party can be entered?
I sympathize with victims of date rape, but these specific claims against Assange would be extremely difficult to prove. How could the women prove that this was not a misunderstanding? How could they prove that they did not mislead Assange? How could they prove that they did not consent?
The description of what is alleged to have happened here asks for the question: How did these adult women get into such an intimate position with Assange if they did not plan on having sex? And, if they planned to have sex, why didn't they check on the condom situation first?
And why are the women talking about this episode? It makes them look like fools in the eyes of this old lady.
I was warned about the dangers of allowing men to take liberties with me when I was very young. Apparently, these women, in spite of their maturity were quite willing partners to Assange's advances. Hmmm. The story stinks if you ask me.
I am reminded of the saying: Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned -- and Assange scorned two of them. For that he must pay.
Assange should be more careful in his sex life, but so should these women in my opinion.