Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
45. How in the world is anyone going to prove that they had sex without a condom or,
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 04:02 PM
Aug 2012

if they did, that the sex was not consensual.

This boils down to he said, she said in the worst way.

What evidence other than the verbal testimony of each party can be entered?

I sympathize with victims of date rape, but these specific claims against Assange would be extremely difficult to prove. How could the women prove that this was not a misunderstanding? How could they prove that they did not mislead Assange? How could they prove that they did not consent?

The description of what is alleged to have happened here asks for the question: How did these adult women get into such an intimate position with Assange if they did not plan on having sex? And, if they planned to have sex, why didn't they check on the condom situation first?

And why are the women talking about this episode? It makes them look like fools in the eyes of this old lady.

I was warned about the dangers of allowing men to take liberties with me when I was very young. Apparently, these women, in spite of their maturity were quite willing partners to Assange's advances. Hmmm. The story stinks if you ask me.

I am reminded of the saying: Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned -- and Assange scorned two of them. For that he must pay.

Assange should be more careful in his sex life, but so should these women in my opinion.

My such a hissy fit. bemildred Aug 2012 #1
Well everyone knew that would happen. Which is why Correa will most likely drag this out sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #2
so sweden has officially charged him with a crime? xchrom Aug 2012 #3
Have you read the findings of fact from the Belmarsh court? msanthrope Aug 2012 #5
What a crock. Your suppositions on what 'most' xchrom Aug 2012 #7
The court findings are not available on Wikileaks. So I presume most msanthrope Aug 2012 #12
Why would England risk an Act of War? Savannahmann Aug 2012 #4
Because when you get right down to it, they're doing the US gov't bidding. Fuddnik Aug 2012 #9
Ding, ding, ding! hifiguy Aug 2012 #16
a better question to ask sweetapogee Aug 2012 #18
It firmly establishes their position within the growing, powerful Latin American block riderinthestorm Aug 2012 #20
I don't see a downside. Fuddnik Aug 2012 #21
Agreed. Ecuador only stands to gain internationally, the UK's stunning move is the biggest question riderinthestorm Aug 2012 #22
London property values are likely to crater, as a result. closeupready Aug 2012 #41
From what I've been told of Swedish law ikri Aug 2012 #44
I've held out this tiny bit of hope that weeks ago, while Ecuador was thinking things over magical thyme Aug 2012 #6
UK police arrest 3 in front of Ecuadorean Embassy dipsydoodle Aug 2012 #8
Ecuador to Let Assange Stay in Its Embassy steve2470 Aug 2012 #10
The UK: The tory Peke that Squeaks. byeya Aug 2012 #11
Live blog of Ecuador statement over Assange asylum: tama Aug 2012 #13
Asylum is granted tama Aug 2012 #14
good. nt xchrom Aug 2012 #15
If G.B. goes so far as to revoke the embassy's status... ljm2002 Aug 2012 #17
I hope Correa orders the Ecuadorean military to raze the British embassy in Quito and coalition_unwilling Aug 2012 #25
all this because he didn't use a condom Enrique Aug 2012 #19
Not quite...here's the actual charges..... msanthrope Aug 2012 #23
Actually, they virtually dropped the charges. They were resurrected only after Wikileaks riderinthestorm Aug 2012 #26
Yes. A senior prosecutor can override the charging decisions of msanthrope Aug 2012 #28
How can he prove political motivation? LiberalLovinLug Aug 2012 #30
Kindly tell me what is consensual or minor or 'low impact' about the acts alleged: msanthrope Aug 2012 #31
Whatever the truth is about these allegations, they don't rise to the level of this kind of reaction riderinthestorm Aug 2012 #38
What kind of reaction should 'rape' properly engender? nt msanthrope Aug 2012 #39
THIS allegation with THIS particular man and Sweden's behavior on these alleged charges riderinthestorm Aug 2012 #42
Ah, "thin and low-impact" rape. Nye Bevan Aug 2012 #43
How in the world is anyone going to prove that they had sex without a condom or, JDPriestly Aug 2012 #45
the political aspect is hard to overlook Enrique Aug 2012 #29
I suspect what caused the UK to react in such a manner is British exceptionalism. msanthrope Aug 2012 #32
Really?? You think the Brits are creating this international incident because of "exceptionalism"? riderinthestorm Aug 2012 #35
Yes. Exceptionalism. nt msanthrope Aug 2012 #36
. riderinthestorm Aug 2012 #37
All this because he refuses to take a DNA test and skipped bail. randome Aug 2012 #24
has it entered your head that perhaps those who are backing Assange do so because Swagman Aug 2012 #33
Fine. An STD test. Geeze, we've already been through this. randome Aug 2012 #34
They want his DNA so that he can be pursued around the world JDPriestly Aug 2012 #46
those in power despise anyone who breaches the wall of state secrecy... mike_c Aug 2012 #27
If the UK makes good on this, it will sink London's property values. closeupready Aug 2012 #40
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Assange will be refused s...»Reply #45