Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

part man all 86

(367 posts)
27. White house response, Eric Schultz:
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 01:08 PM
Aug 2012

Republicans stunningly conceded this is purely political. The very House Republicans pursuing this have acknowledged it is a nakedly political, taxpayer-funded crusade to hurt the President’s re-election campaign. The White House is committed to compliance with the Presidential Records Act. All emails on the White House email system are archived; access to personal email and social networks from the White House network is blocked; and staff is instructed to use official accounts for official communications. Of course, it shouldn’t be surprising that when people have pre-existing professional or personal relationships with White House staff, they may periodically use personal email accounts and receive into them emails they must then preserve for official records. While on the White House staff, Mr. Messina occasionally received and sent email on a long standing personal account. When some of those emails contained information relating to official communications, he took steps to preserve such emails by forwarding them to his White House email account, or copying his White House email account as a recipient. The steps taken by Mr. Messina demonstrate good faith efforts to comply with the Presidential Records Act.

"I will roll for 4 billion" it has been nice knowing you, Jim. crimson77 Aug 2012 #1
Oooops. Fuddnik Aug 2012 #2
Your outta there... dtom67 Aug 2012 #3
This story is not ''news'' it's continuation of an earlier story from Politico from last year..... DeSwiss Aug 2012 #4
"unprecedented openness in government" Poll_Blind Aug 2012 #5
Much ado about nothing... cosmicone Aug 2012 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author stockholmer Aug 2012 #8
Totally agree. This is a big zero. Jessy169 Aug 2012 #9
"Where's the story?" The story is that we were promised exactly the opposite. Psephos Aug 2012 #12
Although your advice is sound, NorthCarolina Aug 2012 #14
Except that the exact opposite was promised in 2008. Dreamer Tatum Aug 2012 #25
:( nt Mojorabbit Aug 2012 #7
LOL, Republicans NEVER meet in private..... Grassy Knoll Aug 2012 #10
One of our selling points is that we are supposed to be better demwing Aug 2012 #13
Really? WeekendWarrior Aug 2012 #19
Yes, lets strive to be more like Republicans. NorthCarolina Aug 2012 #15
One of the meeting places was called the Caribou Coffee? Beacool Aug 2012 #11
They would be meeting her at the Chick-Fil-A. nt NorthCarolina Aug 2012 #16
Speculative witch hunt. nt bemildred Aug 2012 #17
OP: "The report by the Republican-controlled oversight and investigations sub-committee..." ProSense Aug 2012 #24
what does "I will roll Pelosi" mean? Enrique Aug 2012 #18
Generally "roll" means allow or give in, acquiesce. bemildred Aug 2012 #20
It means "take from a sucker." Psephos Aug 2012 #22
so you have to fight with all the weapons available. Why not try to convince the opposition? nt nanabugg Aug 2012 #21
Mitt Romney's Lobbyist Donations Boom In First Half Of 2012 ProSense Aug 2012 #23
I keep reading the title as 'caught WITHOUT lobbyists' Cal Carpenter Aug 2012 #26
White house response, Eric Schultz: part man all 86 Aug 2012 #27
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»White House officials cau...»Reply #27