HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Poland's Solidarity Union... » Reply #21
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Response to Laurian (Reply #3)

Tue Jul 31, 2012, 12:30 AM

21. He didn't.

Polish politics are not US politics. Such ethnocentrism is misplaced.

Many liberals in the former Soviet bloc were conservatives. "Liberal" was still more like what it meant 150 years ago in the West. To be liberal was to be for laissez-faire, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, for some say of the little man in public policy and against forced collectivism.

Heck, even when I got to grad school in the late '80s a lot of people had trouble saying bad things about the USSR, and it wasn't just because of scholarly and travel links. Esp. among undergrads and non-linguists. Say "Solidarity" and they'd roll their eyes. The troublemaker Walesa with his outrageous, pointless demands.

American labor unions had a problem in Russia. They'd been staunchly pro-USSR for a while. Then a bit less so, but they usually waffled. Solzhenitsyn made the US uncomfortable. In the 1970s US labor unions had trouble with a sharply anti-Soviet position, even under Carter. The best they did was have little opinion on the matter. When Reagan was anti-soviet, domestic politics still meant more than human rights. That was Solidarnosc's time. The union's were not about to stand by Reagan as he supported Solidarnosc. Solidarnosc was the labor movement's orphan.

The worker's demands at the time were old-school liberal. Solidarnosc was never really conservative because the term made no sense. It also wasn't "progressive". It was liberal. What it wanted as big compared to most labor union demands.

It was only more than a decade later, when Polish became more western that the West managed, in large measure, to transplant its politics to Poland. Solidarnosc's demands became more picayune. At the same time, their rhetoric became more old-school communist, and the rebranded communists, the same in new packaging, found a home there. Think of it as social pole reversal. Or Pole reversal. Walesa had a major falling out by then. He moved on. He'd won, and if somebody else wanted to move into his pillbox, he didn't care too incredibly much.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 31 replies Author Time Post
stockholmer Jul 2012 OP
Nancy Waterman Jul 2012 #1
grasswire Jul 2012 #2
docgee Jul 2012 #31
Laurian Jul 2012 #3
msongs Jul 2012 #6
starroute Jul 2012 #8
QUALITYCONTRoll Jul 2012 #14
cyclezealot Jul 2012 #15
SunSeeker Jul 2012 #19
boppers Jul 2012 #20
SunSeeker Jul 2012 #22
LineLineReply He didn't.
Igel Jul 2012 #21
cali Jul 2012 #26
nxylas Jul 2012 #27
obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #29
Cal Carpenter Jul 2012 #4
Laurian Jul 2012 #7
freshwest Jul 2012 #10
caseymoz Jul 2012 #11
cyclezealot Jul 2012 #16
Uncle Joe Jul 2012 #5
nolabear Jul 2012 #9
Scurrilous Jul 2012 #12
libodem Jul 2012 #13
ohgeewhiz Jul 2012 #17
Betty Jo Jul 2012 #18
aquart Jul 2012 #23
suffragette Jul 2012 #24
JohnnyRingo Jul 2012 #25
Laurian Jul 2012 #28
Bluenorthwest Jul 2012 #30
Please login to view edit histories.