Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Obama Calls For Government Action On Guns In The Wake Of Colorado Shooting [View all]-..__...
(7,776 posts)69. States are submitting mental health records to the NICS...
"The background checks conducted on those looking to purchase firearms are now more thorough and more complete."
http://www.sys-con.com/node/1694332
However... there is no requirement that they do so (30 states are lagging).
Worth noting... "The NICS Improvement Amendments Act," was a bill put forth by both the NRA and Senator Carolyn Mc Carthy...
"NICS Improvement Amendments Act" Not Gun Control!
Last week, when the U.S. House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed H.R. 2640, "The NICS Improvement Amendments Act," by a voice vote, some gun owners were confused as to the exact scope and effect of this proactive reform bill. Lets look at the facts.
H.R. 2640 provides federal funds to states to update their mental health records, to ensure that those currently prohibited under federal law from owning a gun because of mental health adjudications are included in the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS). For many years, NRA has supported ensuring that those who have been adjudicated mentally incompetent are screened by the NICS.
Snip 8<-------------------------------------------------
Second, some people simply do not like the NICS. In 1993, Congress passed the Brady Act, including a mandatory five-day waiting period, over strong NRA opposition. Due to NRAs insistence, that waiting period was allowed to sunset in 1998, once the NICS was up and running nationwide. Now that the NICS is in place, it makes sense to ensure that this system works as instantly, fairly, and accurately as possible.
Also troubling to many is the fact that Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-N.Y.) is a cosponsor of the bill. Carolyn McCarthy is among the most anti-gun Members of Congress. She has introduced another bill, H.R. 1022, which represents the most sweeping gun ban in history. But Rep. McCarthy is not the only co-sponsor of H.R. 2640. She was joined by some of the most pro-gun members of the House of Representatives in crafting this bill, including John Dingell (D-Mich.), Rick Boucher (D-Va.), and Lamar Smith (R-Tex.). A few years ago, when Congress passed a bill allowing airline pilots to be armed, one of the lead sponsors was anti-gun Senator Barbara Boxer (D-Ca.). Sen. Boxers support of that legislation did not cause gun owners to oppose it.
Last week, when the U.S. House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed H.R. 2640, "The NICS Improvement Amendments Act," by a voice vote, some gun owners were confused as to the exact scope and effect of this proactive reform bill. Lets look at the facts.
H.R. 2640 provides federal funds to states to update their mental health records, to ensure that those currently prohibited under federal law from owning a gun because of mental health adjudications are included in the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS). For many years, NRA has supported ensuring that those who have been adjudicated mentally incompetent are screened by the NICS.
Snip 8<-------------------------------------------------
Second, some people simply do not like the NICS. In 1993, Congress passed the Brady Act, including a mandatory five-day waiting period, over strong NRA opposition. Due to NRAs insistence, that waiting period was allowed to sunset in 1998, once the NICS was up and running nationwide. Now that the NICS is in place, it makes sense to ensure that this system works as instantly, fairly, and accurately as possible.
Also troubling to many is the fact that Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-N.Y.) is a cosponsor of the bill. Carolyn McCarthy is among the most anti-gun Members of Congress. She has introduced another bill, H.R. 1022, which represents the most sweeping gun ban in history. But Rep. McCarthy is not the only co-sponsor of H.R. 2640. She was joined by some of the most pro-gun members of the House of Representatives in crafting this bill, including John Dingell (D-Mich.), Rick Boucher (D-Va.), and Lamar Smith (R-Tex.). A few years ago, when Congress passed a bill allowing airline pilots to be armed, one of the lead sponsors was anti-gun Senator Barbara Boxer (D-Ca.). Sen. Boxers support of that legislation did not cause gun owners to oppose it.
http://www.nraila.org/legislation/federal-legislation/2007/nics-improvement-amendments-act-not-g.aspx?s=%22NICS%22&st=&ps=
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
131 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Obama Calls For Government Action On Guns In The Wake Of Colorado Shooting [View all]
onehandle
Jul 2012
OP
I wish you were right, but I have my doubts from the country that voted bush in twice, and voted
still_one
Jul 2012
#33
voting against feel good gun control or total gun bans is in many people's interest.
alabama_for_obama
Jul 2012
#41
Assult weapons are used to kill many people at once. That is their purpose. That some states do
still_one
Jul 2012
#43
That's exactly what's kept a lot of the NRA membership, and conservatives from embracing
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2012
#7
I don't think there are very many battle-ground swing voters whose single-issue platform are firearm
LanternWaste
Jul 2012
#115
you base this on your assumptions, but I wouldn't be so sure that you are correct.
alabama_for_obama
Jul 2012
#119
let Rmoney explain why everyone should have assault rifles & be able to buy 6000 rounds of ammo on
wordpix
Jul 2012
#104
It's a well-crafted speech, and from an RKBA perspective I have no objection to it
petronius
Jul 2012
#19
which would once against decimate any chance of us pushing a democratic agenda
alabama_for_obama
Jul 2012
#44
uh, probably more than you. but that is irrelevant and not the topic of discussion.
alabama_for_obama
Jul 2012
#93
well gee, I guess the pot vote will go to the repukes, and I know he had the gun vote wrapped up
still_one
Jul 2012
#36
anyone who know anything about rifles knows that the AK-47 is a much more durable weapon than the
still_one
Jul 2012
#38
Actually I think it is about time that people realize what the issues really are. Woman and civil
still_one
Jul 2012
#39
This is the same thing as Pelosi saying it would be ‘really important’ to take on med. marijuana...
Poll_Blind
Jul 2012
#40
I bought mine when it became clear that the state of California was going to pass it's own "AW" ban
slackmaster
Jul 2012
#67
A warning from the 1990's when Gun Rights groups where MUCH WEAKER....
virginia mountainman
Jul 2012
#49
What? I make two practical suggestions that few gun owners disagree with, and NOBODY responds?
slackmaster
Jul 2012
#72
You go ahead and keep believing that. It's unfortunate you don't grasp the President's nuance.
slackmaster
Jul 2012
#89