Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

indivisibleman

(482 posts)
4. true and I think it would be great.
Tue Jul 24, 2012, 01:01 AM
Jul 2012

Too many people work for a business entirely because they want the health insurance.
I think it would be a good thing if insurance was divorced from employment.

And how many would have dropped coverage anyway, because of rising costs? pnwmom Jul 2012 #1
Good point. robinlynne Jul 2012 #7
Precisely Sherman A1 Jul 2012 #12
+1 harun Jul 2012 #26
Not nearly as many Xedniw Jul 2012 #27
That's not what the CBO numbers projected. Hillary's plan was better, but it didn't get passed. pnwmom Jul 2012 #28
Good. So the private sector insurers want no parts of their own system. Universal healthcare... nanabugg Jul 2012 #2
The US government workers will go to Obamacare lovuian Jul 2012 #14
Potentially a good thing bluestateguy Jul 2012 #3
true and I think it would be great. indivisibleman Jul 2012 #4
Employer-offered insurance is subsidized by the government. It's a very unfair system. yardwork Jul 2012 #25
two interesting points indivisibleman Jul 2012 #5
The insurance we can get as individuals doesnt come close! perhaps now that will change. robinlynne Jul 2012 #8
If you have a serious preexisting condition the rates are far lower in a large group plan pnwmom Jul 2012 #10
how old was this person? mopinko Jul 2012 #31
I'll bet anything they were young and healthy joeglow3 Jul 2012 #37
This would give them less reason to overwork people instead of hiring more employees starroute Jul 2012 #6
One problem many employers could have: young workers may be among the first to opt for the exchanges OmahaBlueDog Jul 2012 #9
Medical insurance that's tied to your job doesn't make much sense anyway. Kablooie Jul 2012 #11
Companies want Obamacare lovuian Jul 2012 #13
True musiclawyer Jul 2012 #20
Bingo! mikekohr Jul 2012 #40
Had one announce that he was going to do that in Sunday's Dallas Morning News LTTEs. tanyev Jul 2012 #15
bullshit. mopinko Jul 2012 #32
He was going to retire anyway treestar Jul 2012 #36
Wages better go up lobodons Jul 2012 #16
I believe this will be the fastest way to single payer - when companies start dropping coverage riderinthestorm Jul 2012 #17
It's the second-fastest way JustABozoOnThisBus Jul 2012 #18
Oh touche and right on. I completely agree. riderinthestorm Jul 2012 #19
Not as things currently stand. No way. woo me with science Jul 2012 #29
I keep seeing this as a race in my mind - do the Dems get to install Medicare for all riderinthestorm Jul 2012 #33
There is no evidence whatsoever woo me with science Jul 2012 #39
I can't understand why businesses are lobbying against single payer kimbutgar Jul 2012 #21
Health care costs need to be borne by the general tax fund, not individuals anyway BanTheGOP Jul 2012 #22
well thats Troy Cookin with Gas Jul 2012 #23
They'll pay the penalty under the ACA but that penalty is still cheaper than insuring an employee riderinthestorm Jul 2012 #24
$2,000 per employee but that is cheaper than actually paying half of the premiums underpants Jul 2012 #30
I know. My husband's former employer paid half riderinthestorm Jul 2012 #35
Not entirely bad, since it could decouple coverage from employment treestar Jul 2012 #34
++1000 nt nanabugg Jul 2012 #38
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Deloitte: One in 10 U.S. ...»Reply #4