Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

ChairmanAgnostic

(28,017 posts)

3. I can understand the request for a gag order

Reply to Comrade_McKenzie (Reply #2)

Mon Jul 23, 2012, 06:01 PM

Jul 2012

I can understand trying to cover up a crime against a 17 yr old.
I can understand it, but unless the boys were minors, in many cases, courts do protect the ID of yutes. If they were 18 or older, fuck em.

But, to seek sanctions AFTER the release of their IDs, now, someone was not thinking very hard ahead.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Contempt motion dropped against Ky. teenager [View all] Comrade_McKenzie Jul 2012 OP

What would have happened to her, 20 years ago? AtheistCrusader Jul 2012 #1

Yep, I don't believe that lawyer for a second... Comrade_McKenzie Jul 2012 #2

I can understand the request for a gag order ChairmanAgnostic Jul 2012 #3

Regardless, there never should have been a gag order that pertained to the victim. 1monster Jul 2012 #7

I'm with you on this ChairmanAgnostic Jul 2012 #10

Good to hear. AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2012 #4

This message was self-deleted by its author Gman Jul 2012 #5

This is good news Gothmog Jul 2012 #6

Good 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #8

No sense at all. Part of the reason for publishing the names of the guilty A Simple Game Jul 2012 #9

excellent! Liberal_in_LA Jul 2012 #11