HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » [Stephanie Cutter] Dem ai... » Reply #18
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Response to Igel (Reply #16)

Sun Jul 15, 2012, 07:42 PM

18. Because they won't tell us who the acting CEO was

so yeah, I'm going to assume that the person who signed the documents listing himself as CEO, president, chairman of the board and sole stockholder was the person in charge. Even if he wasn't involved in the day-to-day operations he's responsible because he signed those documents saying he was the boss. Why won't they just tell us who was in charge if it wasn't Rmoney? They are completely silent on this specific fact and will only say it was a committee so based on the facts as we know them there was no acting CEO. Are you aware of any company run by committee without one person making the final decisions?

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 27 replies Author Time Post
maddezmom Jul 2012 OP
msanthrope Jul 2012 #1
randome Jul 2012 #7
DCKit Jul 2012 #20
young_at_heart Jul 2012 #2
SemperEadem Jul 2012 #10
BumRushDaShow Jul 2012 #11
SemperEadem Jul 2012 #17
mucifer Jul 2012 #3
Champion Jack Jul 2012 #4
Botany Jul 2012 #5
Cosmocat Jul 2012 #13
Iliyah Jul 2012 #6
RedStateLiberal Jul 2012 #8
Igel Jul 2012 #16
LineLineLineNew Reply Because they won't tell us who the acting CEO was
RedStateLiberal Jul 2012 #18
wordpix Aug 2012 #24
ejbr Jul 2012 #9
cilla4progress Jul 2012 #12
freshwest Jul 2012 #14
wordpix Aug 2012 #25
truthisfreedom Jul 2012 #15
KeepItReal Jul 2012 #19
sarcasmo Jul 2012 #21
Kablooie Jul 2012 #22
avebury Aug 2012 #23
wordpix Aug 2012 #26
bushisanidiot Aug 2012 #27
Please login to view edit histories.