Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Geithner drawn into Libor scandal [View all]dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)46. The movements were down to support their balance sheets
and not for any other reason. They didn't want their banks to be nationalised. The side effectof that reduced their profits. The beneficeries were traders who may have had advanced knowledge of likely movements up or down.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
51 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Geither had just been appointed in 2008, and it sounds like he gave reasonable advice. There is no
pnwmom
Jul 2012
#14
1) NY Fed knew for at least a year before any sort of memo was sent. 2) Nothing was said publicly.
leveymg
Jul 2012
#51
Where have you pulled "he discovers that Barclays is not giving accurate information" from?
muriel_volestrangler
Jul 2012
#32
But the OP gives the distinct impression that you think the article indicates he did something wrong
drm604
Jul 2012
#12
The $200 billion bail-out for predator banks and Spitzer charges are intimately linked
midnight
Jul 2012
#27
new WaPo headline: Geithner made recommendations on Libor in 2008, documents show
maddezmom
Jul 2012
#37
Yep, that was a better headline, more information with the same conclusion...
MrMickeysMom
Jul 2012
#41