Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

heaven05

(18,124 posts)

34. according to you?

Reply to slackmaster (Reply #30)

Thu Jul 5, 2012, 09:53 PM

Jul 2012

I wonder

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge: George Zimmerman's New Bond: $1 Million [View all] Hissyspit Jul 2012 OP

It's not enough. no_hypocrisy Jul 2012 #1

No, it's not. He puts up $100,000 that isn't even money he earned, it's basically kestrel91316 Jul 2012 #7

Not even Scairp Jul 2012 #38

I would have asked for a detailed list of how much money is in that paypal account LynneSin Jul 2012 #2

agreed maddezmom Jul 2012 #3

This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Jul 2012 #4

You might want to read the ruling before coming to such a strong conclusion slackmaster Jul 2012 #6

fairness?? heaven05 Jul 2012 #8

The judge's ruling has numerous specific citations of statutes and case law. It's very thorough. slackmaster Jul 2012 #12

This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Jul 2012 #15

Your reply is insulting and adds no value to the discussion slackmaster Jul 2012 #18

Explaining why x was done according to the law is not supporting Zimmerman, its supporting the law. cstanleytech Jul 2012 #21

good point naaman fletcher Jul 2012 #22

This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Jul 2012 #25

Huh? naaman fletcher Jul 2012 #27

This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Jul 2012 #29

Nothing in your post was illegal or has anything to do with due process, bupkus. slackmaster Jul 2012 #30

according to you? heaven05 Jul 2012 #34

Who needs laws? Democat Jul 2012 #40

George can't tell a straight story... alp227 Jul 2012 #5

Why isn't anyone going after this stupid law???! ilikeitthatway Jul 2012 #9

It's very important that criminal defendants be eligible to be granted bond. slackmaster Jul 2012 #13

This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Jul 2012 #16

His bond was revoked for lying to the court slackmaster Jul 2012 #19

This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Jul 2012 #26

You are entitled to your opinions, but the judge has to follow the law slackmaster Jul 2012 #31

So the rule of law means nothing to you permatex Jul 2012 #36

Gun culturists will cover his check easily. nt onehandle Jul 2012 #10

Too Much Comet Jul 2012 #11

This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Jul 2012 #17

LOL PSPS Jul 2012 #24

Comet, if Zimmerman's defense were really that clear, he would not have been indicted. JDPriestly Jul 2012 #20

Thank you permatex Jul 2012 #37

Trials sometimes bring surprises. Remember the OJ trial. JDPriestly Jul 2012 #39

You have evidence on this case? crim son Jul 2012 #23

Yea........... FarPoint Jul 2012 #28

The prosecution is going to have to assemble an account that fits known facts but contradicts... slackmaster Jul 2012 #32

i like it. barbtries Jul 2012 #14

He makes himself look guiltier and guiltier every time he gets listened to. marble falls Jul 2012 #33

Let me take a guess at who'll start a fundraising drive for his bail, now. Bucky Jul 2012 #35