Latest Breaking News

calimary

(81,127 posts)

14. The timing STINKS. That alone started setting off alarm bells for me.

Reply to George II (Reply #2)

Tue Jul 26, 2016, 11:22 AM

Jul 2016

Awfully fishy...

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

153 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Russian Hackers Altered Emails Before Release to Wikileaks [View all] apnu Jul 2016 OP

I smell a trump. C_U_L8R Jul 2016 #1

I don't think Trump is smart enough to orchestrate this. apnu Jul 2016 #6

Could still be arm's length bucolic_frolic Jul 2016 #12

Maybe, I dunno. apnu Jul 2016 #13

obama enid602 Jul 2016 #124

No, he isnt smart enough to pull it off but he certainly has the money to hire such people. cstanleytech Jul 2016 #19

I don't even think he's smart enough to hire someone to do it. Chemisse Jul 2016 #107

His loudmouth spokesman is though. Kingofalldems Jul 2016 #22

Yes, Paul Manafort likely has strong ties with people in Russia LiberalFighter Jul 2016 #127

You're right, Trump isn't sophisticated enough to plan something that complex. procon Jul 2016 #40

I agree. Trump is smart enough to suck up to other strong men who in turn may help him FighttheFuture Jul 2016 #68

Those around him would be foolish to let him in on it. Chemisse Jul 2016 #110

Plausible Deniability takes on a new level of meaning when working with Trump!! FighttheFuture Jul 2016 #113

Trump is not the one doing the thinking: He doesn't do this: He hires hit men lewebley3 Jul 2016 #106

Correct this is sll putin Cosmocat Jul 2016 #139

What about Paul Manafort though? workinclasszero Jul 2016 #146

Trump isn't smart enough but Manafort probably is... radical noodle Jul 2016 #152

Agree, looks like he outsourced his oppo research bigbrother05 Jul 2016 #73

More like a Manafort. Koinos Jul 2016 #82

Trump is Putin's Useful Idiot. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2016 #131

I suspected that minutes after they were "leaked". George II Jul 2016 #2

The timing STINKS. That alone started setting off alarm bells for me. calimary Jul 2016 #14

Congress need to investigate if Trump is in bed with our enemies: We need hearings!!! lewebley3 Jul 2016 #111

OR... dare I suspect... if Trump owes Putin money? calimary Jul 2016 #133

Trump should be investigate by the CIA and congress: Obama need call for hearings lewebley3 Jul 2016 #150

Trump is now receiving national security briefs workinclasszero Jul 2016 #147

Trumps has no core values of right or Wrong: Obama need to put the CiA on Trumps tail lewebley3 Jul 2016 #149

Agreed workinclasszero Jul 2016 #151

Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2016 #136

Still if the *content* of the emails were fraudulent... thesquanderer Jul 2016 #20

"Although so far the actual content of the leaked documents appears not to have been tampered with" uawchild Jul 2016 #25

Right. That's my point. thesquanderer Jul 2016 #27

"Some yet to be divined reason"? Are you not aware of the connection between Putin... George II Jul 2016 #32

I've heard that. Scary stuff. Could we be opening our elections to Russian interference? Putin is Laser102 Jul 2016 #47

I was talking specifically about the purpose of these specific alterations. (n/t) thesquanderer Jul 2016 #51

"Although so far the actual content of the leaked documents appears not to have been tampered with" uawchild Jul 2016 #26

It's a good thing this is being widely reported in our media. BlueCaliDem Jul 2016 #3

MSM always on the job protecting our freedom workinclasszero Jul 2016 #148

Taking their cue from the GOP Benghazi 'investigation'. (nt) ehrnst Jul 2016 #4

Not so sure about altering content bluedye33139 Jul 2016 #5

Right Rid is mentioned in my original link. apnu Jul 2016 #8

It's a slog to read through! bluedye33139 Jul 2016 #10

You aren't sure? Democat Jul 2016 #36

I'm not "concerned," if bluedye33139 Jul 2016 #39

Figures. rec, thanks, nt. Mc Mike Jul 2016 #7

Very interesting. n/t Tarheel_Dem Jul 2016 #9

Well surprise, surprise, surprise... Blue Idaho Jul 2016 #11

"the actual content of the leaked documents appears not to have been tampered with" uawchild Jul 2016 #33

Ok, but how does that square with: Blue Idaho Jul 2016 #45

Sure, Thanks for the opportunity to add clarity to this misleading article uawchild Jul 2016 #57

Thank You. Blue Idaho Jul 2016 #86

NO, thank you. uawchild Jul 2016 #96

Scuzzy Republican dirty tricks with their evil Rooski comrades RapSoDee Jul 2016 #15

Russians not Polish!!!!! crosinski Jul 2016 #140

OK, Evil Rooskys & Republicans - Casino Comrades RapSoDee Jul 2016 #141

Yes it does suck ... crosinski Jul 2016 #142

This would be easy to prove as the DNC can cross check with their original emails. NWCorona Jul 2016 #16

The CONTENTS were not tampered with. READ the ARTICLE uawchild Jul 2016 #23

Yeah, I didn't read the article as it did seem like spin. NWCorona Jul 2016 #41

EXACTLY uawchild Jul 2016 #48

It seems people want to act like what the Russians are doing is new. NWCorona Jul 2016 #53

Sounds to me bullsnarfle Jul 2016 #128

Surprise, surprise, Loki Jul 2016 #17

You have been gamed uawchild Jul 2016 #28

No, we have been gamed, and it's not by the DNC. Loki Jul 2016 #31

Why are we acting like foreign involvement is new in presidential politics? NWCorona Jul 2016 #43

Remember how upset people were about China in 1996? Orrex Jul 2016 #18

"Although so far the actual content of the leaked documents appears not to have been tampered with" uawchild Jul 2016 #21

So who leaked the emails? Kingofalldems Jul 2016 #24

Is it the contents or who leaked them? NWCorona Jul 2016 #44

The truth is coming out. Seems like it may not confirm your 'Truth' at all. emulatorloo Jul 2016 #29

WRONG: "Russian Hackers Altered Emails Before Release to Wikileaks" uawchild Jul 2016 #42

The source of the leak is a separate issue from the content of the leak emulatorloo Jul 2016 #52

The headline AND first sentence make it very clear what the subject of the OP is -- the CONTENT. uawchild Jul 2016 #64

Look, the article says the content wasn't altered. You yourself confirm emulatorloo Jul 2016 #75

Good grief. Maybe we should wait for further info? Hortensis Jul 2016 #87

Article says metadata altered, content not altered emulatorloo Jul 2016 #91

lol Once AGAIN, why the article is DECEPTIVE. uawchild Jul 2016 #95

Just so you know, meta data is important too. apnu Jul 2016 #54

In addition..... Doodley Jul 2016 #89

You seem heavily invested in defending Republicans Democat Jul 2016 #37

Nope, just heavily invested in not putting up with bullshit like the kind Republicans do. Hissyspit Jul 2016 #145

Oh right, the content hasn't been altered The_Casual_Observer Jul 2016 #30

its from this OP Article ! lol uawchild Jul 2016 #34

Your post count is skyrocketing as you defend Trump Democat Jul 2016 #38

Excellent observation tenderfoot Jul 2016 #101

Did article claim content had been altered? No emulatorloo Jul 2016 #35

Why yes it did in the Headline and the FIRST sentence, did you read those? uawchild Jul 2016 #46

More defending of Trump? Democat Jul 2016 #50

Could you combine all your Trump defenses into one post? Kingofalldems Jul 2016 #97

Then Brad Marshall needs to stand up and say he never said he'd do to bigots to bait Bluenorthwest Jul 2016 #49

What if Trump is actively working with Putin?? workinclasszero Jul 2016 #55

That would be treason. apnu Jul 2016 #56

Yes indeed workinclasszero Jul 2016 #60

DINGDINGDINGDINGDINGDINGDINGDINGDING!!! truthisfreedom Jul 2016 #58

Yeah, that's the big question. emulatorloo Jul 2016 #59

Probably but.. workinclasszero Jul 2016 #62

And we followed the shiny ball down the rabbit hole. RandySF Jul 2016 #61

Of course it is tomorrow there most of today. Festivito Jul 2016 #63

The documents referred to are not the emails. Ghost Dog Jul 2016 #65

Then why did DWS resign? B2G Jul 2016 #66

You're missing the point apnu Jul 2016 #72

Of course I'm not "OK with that". B2G Jul 2016 #76

You are missing the point, the OP article was purposefully misleading uawchild Jul 2016 #77

Millions believe the emails prove misconduct, Hortensis Jul 2016 #98

Is that why the DNC already admitted wrongdoing? avaistheone1 Jul 2016 #67

What!? fleabiscuit Jul 2016 #70

Maybe the DNC will release it's emails to prove it Omaha Steve Jul 2016 #69

This message was self-deleted by its author fleabiscuit Jul 2016 #71

Opps, wrong post. fleabiscuit Jul 2016 #74

Donna Brazile: 'I apologized' to Sanders Campaign video Omaha Steve Jul 2016 #83

Donna Brazille did the right thing. So happy DWS is gone. emulatorloo Jul 2016 #100

Its a purposely misleading story uawchild Jul 2016 #80

Why would the DNC try and spin it? Dkc05 Jul 2016 #90

The article does not say the content was altered. emulatorloo Jul 2016 #81

Why do you keep saying: "The article does not say the content was altered." uawchild Jul 2016 #84

We're done. I've not distracted from facts. I disagree with your assertion that the article is emulatorloo Jul 2016 #94

You keep ignoring the overwhelmingly misleading lead in to this story. uawchild Jul 2016 #109

Appreciate the apology n/t emulatorloo Jul 2016 #112

Thanks, I apologize a lot. lol uawchild Jul 2016 #115

... emulatorloo Jul 2016 #118

Thanks to both replies Omaha Steve Jul 2016 #92

Thank you Steve! emulatorloo Jul 2016 #103

I knew it was a set up all along. The Emails have been altered to make the DNC look bad. Dkc05 Jul 2016 #78

it says above that at least so far, it appears that the content was not tampered with. barbtries Jul 2016 #85

Yep you are correct Dkc05 Jul 2016 #88

Republicans in bed with the Rooskis RapSoDee Jul 2016 #79

That destroys the credibility of anything they have or will leak. liberal N proud Jul 2016 #93

Were you just deceived by this misleading article? Seems so. uawchild Jul 2016 #102

Were you deceived by Donald Trump? Democat Jul 2016 #104

I think that's unfair to uawchild emulatorloo Jul 2016 #116

now now uawchild Jul 2016 #122

I'm defending you from accusations/insinuations that you are pro-Trump emulatorloo Jul 2016 #125

lol n/t uawchild Jul 2016 #130

Maybe you should report this to Skinner or EarlG. Kingofalldems Jul 2016 #129

Okay then HitchStop Jul 2016 #99

No one cares that a few emails dissed Sanders. His own colleagues stayed away from endorsing him. randome Jul 2016 #108

Where is the evidence that it was done by Russian Hackers? hueymahl Jul 2016 #105

You didn't read the links in my OP apnu Jul 2016 #117

I did read your links hueymahl Jul 2016 #126

"Why Experts Are Sure Russia Hacked the DNC Emails" emulatorloo Jul 2016 #121

"The rush to blame Russia for the DNC email hack is premature" uawchild Jul 2016 #132

What's Rove up to these days? They_Live Jul 2016 #114

Heard Trump on tv this morning acting like he had nothing at all to do with Russia and the hack. lark Jul 2016 #119

Robert Reich has a run down of known facts of a Trump-Putin bromance on FB apnu Jul 2016 #120

Rove is probably hanging with whoever's calling himself "Felix Edmundovitch" DFW Jul 2016 #123

The plot thickens indeed... Blue_Tires Jul 2016 #134

not LBN, alerted reorg Jul 2016 #135

'Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs.' Rex Jul 2016 #137

absolutely reorg Jul 2016 #138

This is all speculation. Some or all of it may be true, or false. But it's complete speculation. DisgustipatedinCA Jul 2016 #143

"Although so far the actual content of the leaked documents appears not to have been tampered with" Hissyspit Jul 2016 #144

The horse has already left the barn. avaistheone1 Jul 2016 #153