Reply #70

In the discussion thread: Father Who Killed Daughter's Alleged Molester Won't Face Charges In Lavaca County, Texas [View all]

Response to Great Caesars Ghost (Original post)

Thu Jun 21, 2012, 03:32 AM

Lil Missy (13,845 posts)

70. No jury would ever convict.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

70 replies	Author	Time	Post
Father Who Killed Daughter's Alleged Molester Won't Face Charges In Lavaca County, Texas [View all]	Great Caesars Ghost	Jun 2012	OP
I'm fully ok with this...	hlthe2b	Jun 2012	#1
agreed.... n/t	IamK	Jun 2012	#3
Yep.	Stuckinthebush	Jun 2012	#37
Well said and agreed.	MightyOkie	Jun 2012	#46
Good call by the GJ and investigators. n/t	bluesbassman	Jun 2012	#2
He was saving a child from grave bodily harm	Warpy	Jun 2012	#4
Everything beyond stopping the molester and incapacitating him is murder	MNBrewer	Jun 2012	#5
That's very noble from a chair on the Internet. But his young daughter is being	jtuck004	Jun 2012	#9
It is easy as hell to kill barehanded..............	kooljerk666	Jun 2012	#60
I totally agree with you, yet I cannot imagine myself doing anything less if placed in the same	left on green only	Jun 2012	#10
Vigilante justice implies he found out after the fact	ProudToBeBlueInRhody	Jun 2012	#11
It's not any sort of crime, passion or not.	LisaL	Jun 2012	#24
The law disagrees. (nt)	Posteritatis	Jun 2012	#12
In an emergency, it's tough to know just where to draw the line.	freedom fighter jh	Jun 2012	#13
It would be exceptionally hard to prove exactly which punch incapacitated him vs killing him	dsc	Jun 2012	#14
Excellent point	Blasphemer	Jun 2012	#18
Absolutely right.	colorado_ufo	Jun 2012	#27
he did stop the molestor	frylock	Jun 2012	#16
He saved not only his daughter but probably countless other daughters. Molesters are repeat	appleannie1	Jun 2012	#21
Nonsense.	LisaL	Jun 2012	#23
It has nothing to do with law.	zeemike	Jun 2012	#39
But we can blame the cop if they beat a suspect to death with a baton, right?	cstanleytech	Jun 2012	#63
I fail to see how that has anything to do with this.	zeemike	Jun 2012	#64
You did or did not say	cstanleytech	Jun 2012	#65
Well cops and soldiers kill all the time is self defense or in the line of duty	zeemike	Jun 2012	#66
Except even cops and soldiers dont have a blank check to murder people	cstanleytech	Jun 2012	#67
Apparently not.	AnotherMcIntosh	Jun 2012	#25
Agreed.	progressivebydesign	Jun 2012	#28
Wow, just WOW.	boppers	Jun 2012	#32
It's not "lifelong trauma"	kurtzapril4	Jun 2012	#48
You may find it "offensive" but...	SkyDaddy7	Jun 2012	#62
You're not a victim the rest of your days, unless you want to be.	boppers	Jun 2012	#69
it seems apparent that he did not intend to kill the guy, just disable him.	Kablooie	Jun 2012	#49
My father is a world class martial artist. He says you need to know how not to kill a person	Exultant Democracy	Jun 2012	#54
You make many assumptions	MrBig	Jun 2012	#53
Let's see how you react when you see it happening to one of your kids	SpartanDem	Jun 2012	#30
weak sauce	SemperEadem	Jun 2012	#34
The US Supreme Court has ruled you have to have INTENT to be convicted of Murder	happyslug	Jun 2012	#44
The guy was still alive when he stopped hitting him	hack89	Jun 2012	#51
Truly the greatest injustice ever	4th law of robotics	Jun 2012	#52
In this case, MNBrewer?	Great Caesars Ghost	Jun 2012	#56
You should be ashamed of yourself!	SkyDaddy7	Jun 2012	#61
I'd let the guy walk, too.	MADem	Jun 2012	#6
Awful situation. I say let them be, and give some help.	nolabear	Jun 2012	#7
ok.	emilyg	Jun 2012	#8
Sounds like justifiable homicide to me.	MrTwister	Jun 2012	#15
Could not agree more.	christx30	Jun 2012	#19
You know, I wouldn't kill someone like that in front of my child.	progressivebydesign	Jun 2012	#29
"equally damaging in this"	boppers	Jun 2012	#33
Frankly, you have no idea how you would react.	Javaman	Jun 2012	#41
The issue is did the father think?	happyslug	Jun 2012	#45
If you were in that	christx30	Jun 2012	#50
Roger, that.	MrTwister	Jun 2012	#55
I would worry about anyone who DIDN'T commit violence in defense of their children.	The Doctor.	Jun 2012	#17
He didn't stalk the guy, he didn't shoot him	tularetom	Jun 2012	#20
I don't think I could kill anybody but I'm not sure I wouldn't want to.	EFerrari	Jun 2012	#22
Most people would have done the same.	Beacool	Jun 2012	#26
I would have done the same thing.	Arctic Dave	Jun 2012	#31
I'm glad he won't be indicted--he shouldn't be	SemperEadem	Jun 2012	#35
I totally disagree with the decision	mazzarro	Jun 2012	#36
I agree with you knowing in my heart I would have done the exact thing dad did, ......	marble falls	Jun 2012	#38
Well let me play a little game with you on this.	zeemike	Jun 2012	#40
There were witnesses, but don't let that stop you.	lunatica	Jun 2012	#58
That was the point I was trying to make.	zeemike	Jun 2012	#59
Did you read the article??	Javaman	Jun 2012	#42
He was investigated, went before the Grand Jury and they said that this isn't a crime	AngryAmish	Jun 2012	#43
Being a father of 2 daughters (now grown) I always worried about rape.	Dustlawyer	Jun 2012	#47
It's best to allow the legal, constabulary, medical, forensic, judicial systems to handle things	bucolic_frolic	Jun 2012	#57
Good. Just once, the system worked.	2ndAmForComputers	Jun 2012	#68
No jury would ever convict.	Lil Missy	Jun 2012	#70

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.