Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Obama Asserts Executive Privilege On Fast And Furious Documents [View all]PavePusher
(15,374 posts)98. We want a way to be answerable to the American people, and cork that fuck Issa.
I'm pretty sure this isn't it.
And if it's not about Terry, then there certainly isn't anything to hide, right?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
162 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
White House to Issa: FUCK OFF! Now, go steal another car or something, asshole.
11 Bravo
Jun 2012
#2
You win the thread!!!! I hope MIRT runs through here and does some light housekeeping, though!! nt
MADem
Jun 2012
#56
trying to get through to the crowd in this thread: this is a RWnut/Faux News conspiracy
wordpix
Jun 2012
#118
also, this wacky conspiracy involves the NRA and "taking our guns away" hysteria crowd
wordpix
Jun 2012
#120
re: Holder Asks White House To Exert Executive Privilege Over Fast And Furious Docs
clang1
Jun 2012
#3
But Prosecitor's report are like Grand Jury, only confidential for a time period
happyslug
Jun 2012
#124
the viewpoint that guns and ammo in the hands of the public is bad for the country!
Kolesar
Jun 2012
#6
the only anti-gun sentiment is in the minds of the RW SS trooper who started this wacky conspiracy +
wordpix
Jun 2012
#117
Bush invoked executive priviledge 6 times and Clinton 14 times. Considering that
SlimJimmy
Jun 2012
#13
I never said he couldn't. I said the optics don't look good to the uninformed masses. You have to
SlimJimmy
Jun 2012
#122
And you know this...how? You've read the material? NO? You're talking RW talking points.
MADem
Jun 2012
#62
"WE" are--and "we" don't repeat rightwing talking points that earn us pepperoni. nt
MADem
Jun 2012
#77
Yes, he was, and people who use him as a rightwing talking point should be ashamed of themselves.
MADem
Jun 2012
#91
We want a way to be answerable to the American people, and cork that fuck Issa.
PavePusher
Jun 2012
#98
And I state again: If there is nothing to hide, show this, and yank the rug out from under Issa.
PavePusher
Jun 2012
#102
Holder is LEGALLY PROHIBITED from releasing documents related to an ongoing investigation.
MADem
Jun 2012
#104
Show some proof and suddenly you don't have a dog in this fight any more
justiceischeap
Jun 2012
#127
I doubt that loser works at all, unless you count taking out the trash and mowing mom's lawn on his
MADem
Jun 2012
#78
Actually, it was Armitage that outed Plame. Rove and his minions (Libby) took advantage of the
SlimJimmy
Jun 2012
#123
I totally agree with you on this. People think this a huge cover up - because it is.
IndyJones
Jun 2012
#49
Well, you and "YOU people" need to step quickly so the door doesn't hit you. Enjoy that PPR. nt
MADem
Jun 2012
#61
Infuriating Republicans so much the leadership has reigned in Issa multiple times?
jeff47
Jun 2012
#40
You're gone, and soon to be forgotten. But you can't release a redacted document and comply with a
MADem
Jun 2012
#69
ONLY if jurors vote to hide--Skinner needs to look at any juror who doesn't get it. And he can. nt
MADem
Jun 2012
#53
Issa has been trying to build his own Whitewater investigation out of this for over a year.
JoePhilly
Jun 2012
#71
You're not getting it, this isn't about Terry. It's about Issa trying to grandstand.
MADem
Jun 2012
#92
So provide the answers being requested and yank the rug out from under Issa.
PavePusher
Jun 2012
#97
No. Let them keep browbeating the black Attorney General, after he has been to the Hill to answer
MADem
Jun 2012
#99
Why do you keep whining that Holder won't release documents he is legally prohibited from releasing?
MADem
Jun 2012
#103
Doubling down? A stick in the eye? A way of inserting the WH into this business preparatory to a
MADem
Jun 2012
#125
And if he had handed over the documents, they would have busted him for breaking the law
justiceischeap
Jun 2012
#128
This is not about the death of any federal agent--take that OFF the table right now.
MADem
Jun 2012
#136
You need to direct your questions to Darrell Issa. He's the one trying to deliver a contempt cite
MADem
Jun 2012
#138
That is Elijah Cummings' lengthy statement that I referenced. He is Ranking on that committee. nt
MADem
Jun 2012
#148
This is a minority statement, not his personally - but that's the one you wanted? n/t
Littlewon
Jun 2012
#151
Elijah Cummings is RANKING on that Committee--i.e., when the Democrats take back the House,
MADem
Jun 2012
#152
Yes thanks M - I understand these concepts. It is more accurately a 'Minority statement' ...
Littlewon
Jun 2012
#155
Wow - surprises us both - it MAY IN FACT ultimately come down to the murder. 3rd gun found.
Littlewon
Jun 2012
#161
With the options available, Why did OBAMA choose Executive Priv? asks Twitter: @McQandO
Littlewon
Jun 2012
#158
thread/links: NRA blackmailed Republican lawmakers into voting to hold Eric Holder in contempt
wordpix
Jun 2012
#115
no, go to Rachel's video on this-she explains how a RWnut who styles himself after Timothy McVeigh
wordpix
Jun 2012
#154
With all the options available to OBAMA, WHY CHOOSE EXECUTIVE PRIV? @ Twitter: @McQandO
Littlewon
Jun 2012
#159