Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

villager

(26,001 posts)
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 02:52 AM Jun 2012

Obama, Romney in virtual tie in polls; numbers static since April [View all]

Source: Detroit Free Press

WASHINGTON -- Since mid-April, the average price for a gallon of regular gasoline has dropped nearly 40 cents. President Barack Obama has announced support for same-sex marriage. Government statisticians have delivered two disappointing monthly jobs reports. Tensions have ebbed and flowed with Iran. And Mitt Romney has clinched the Republican presidential nomination.

And the presidential polls? Flat-lined.

Contradicting reams of punditry, national polls have not moved an inch amid those events -- not to mention the lesser political battles that have animated cable news programs. In Gallup's daily polling, to take one example, Romney and Obama were tied 46%-46% on April 11. Two months later, the poll had Obama up one point, 46%-45%, a statistically identical result. For more than seven weeks, neither candidate's standing has moved more than 3 percentage points -- well within the poll's margin of error.

Instead of a race, the campaign for president has turned into something more closely resembling trench warfare: dug-in armies, intense exchanges of fire, no movement.

The lack of movement is problematic for Obama. Both candidates, of course, would like to have broken free by now. But for Romney, just keeping Obama below 50% counts as an advantage, on the assumption that a majority of late deciders are more likely to vote against the incumbent.

By contrast, many Democratic strategists had hoped that by now Obama would have started to build a lead over the Republican, whom they derided earlier this year as a weak nominee with little popularity even within his own part

Read more: http://www.freep.com/article/20120617/NEWS07/206170581/Obama-Romney-in-virtual-tie-in-polls-numbers-static-since-April

61 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A lot of the problem is Democrats do not fight back. The republicans have said social still_one Jun 2012 #1
Then you haven't been LISTENING. Obama and Dems have defended Medicare and SS over and over again. RBInMaine Jun 2012 #12
Ron Barber just won in AZ largely due to fighting for SS and Medicare and making those the issue. RBInMaine Jun 2012 #14
Not really. former9thward Jun 2012 #44
BS ! Those weren't the only reasons at all. If the Dem didn't campaign right he would have LOST. RBInMaine Jun 2012 #53
We can all draw a picture of any election. former9thward Jun 2012 #54
To assume Barber's campaign work was meaningless and to attribute the win just to a sympathy vote RBInMaine Jun 2012 #57
I have been involved in political campaigns since I was 14. former9thward Jun 2012 #61
Money for wimps?? Votes for wimps??? pocoloco Jun 2012 #23
The Electoral Map tells a different story JaneQPublic Jun 2012 #2
Yes... national polls are misleading. The election is determined state by state. DCBob Jun 2012 #3
Can you list the "states that matter" Marzupialis Jun 2012 #24
see Demwing's post below.. DCBob Jun 2012 #31
Not all of them. hrmjustin Jun 2012 #49
I think most polling shows WI and MI safe. DCBob Jun 2012 #50
been saying that for months cindyperry2010 Jun 2012 #22
Look at these 5 "Toss Up" States: MI, NH, NV, WI, VA demwing Jun 2012 #26
Perhaps. Igel Jun 2012 #38
Which is why Obama has such an interesting challenge demwing Jun 2012 #41
221's still not enough ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jun 2012 #45
And poison gas. FailureToCommunicate Jun 2012 #4
I don't believe it. Shadowflash Jun 2012 #5
All the media has to do is keep hammering away, creating plausible denyablity. scubadude Jun 2012 #6
In 2010 several "projected winners" were called INdemo Jun 2012 #11
Well stated DeeDeeNY Jun 2012 #17
Bill Clinton, Corey Booker and Ed Rendell, hijacking Obama's message and Kahuna Jun 2012 #7
Bullshit - they are setting it up to steal another election. liberal N proud Jun 2012 #8
You are right liberal fasttense Jun 2012 #10
Ditto! goclark Jun 2012 #20
anyone who thinks that this will be an easy win bowens43 Jun 2012 #9
First, we don't need paranoia. Next, polls now don't mean much. Finally, Obama most likely wins. RBInMaine Jun 2012 #13
As much as I want to agree demwing Jun 2012 #29
I simply do not believe this...look at rally attendance and/or voter enthusiasm. AzDar Jun 2012 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author DWinNJ Jun 2012 #16
I don't believe this crap poll either bonniebgood Jun 2012 #18
MSM is trying to pile on Obama that is clear underpants Jun 2012 #19
BULLSHIT Iliyah Jun 2012 #21
Wake me up when it's anyone but Gallup. Baitball Blogger Jun 2012 #25
Or Rasmussen /nt demwing Jun 2012 #30
They're just trying to get it close to five a Repub a chance to steal the Baitball Blogger Jun 2012 #35
HIT PIECE ALERT!!! rocktivity Jun 2012 #27
The President needs to talk directly to lower economic class Whites. The racism we are seeing patrice Jun 2012 #28
This is where Uncle Joe will earn his stripes demwing Jun 2012 #33
I am praying for him. Sat nam! patrice Jun 2012 #34
I bow to Truth demwing Jun 2012 #36
in grateful service . . . patrice Jun 2012 #40
OH please,. why is this any advantage to Rmoney? treestar Jun 2012 #32
Agreed. It is summer and lots of people won't pay close attention until September emulatorloo Jun 2012 #39
Is this a nation of masochists? Fgiriun Jun 2012 #37
Well, even though there were enough election anomalies-little boots made it to president twice newspeak Jun 2012 #60
McSame had it all tied up quaker bill Jun 2012 #42
Gotta keep that Citizen's United money flowing to the media thelordofhell Jun 2012 #43
In theory, Romney should be leading ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jun 2012 #46
Regardless of party, anyone presiding over this lousy economy would have problems Beacool Jun 2012 #47
I am sure Hillary would to DonCoquixote Jun 2012 #51
What's your point? Beacool Jun 2012 #52
Is this the beginning of propaganda so we buy it when they steal another election???? judesedit Jun 2012 #48
It's might bee too late. scubadude Jun 2012 #59
You know something is wrong with polling when Mitt is tied with Obama. nanabugg Jun 2012 #55
Too many polls!!! hrmjustin Jun 2012 #56
Jobs Freddie Stubbs Jun 2012 #58
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Obama, Romney in virtual ...