Reply #20

In the discussion thread: Rep. Darrell Issa willing to postpone House contempt vote against AG Eric Holder [View all]

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 04:06 PM

24601 (2,536 posts)

20. Vietnam didn't have to start under Johnson to drive him from running again. It's not what

you were left by the prior folks, but what you did with it that really matters.

And, it's almost never the original act as much as the cover-up.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

32 replies	Author	Time	Post
Rep. Darrell Issa willing to postpone House contempt vote against AG Eric Holder [View all]	steve2470	Jun 2012	OP
"Willing to postpone?" Does that mean he doesn't have his team "in line?" nt	MADem	Jun 2012	#1
It means Karl Rove called Issa.	sofa king	Jun 2012	#8
must-see vid on the issues on Ed Show here - role of guns, assault weapons is major issue	wordpix	Jun 2012	#29
I like your explanation. I hope you are right...	CTyankee	Jun 2012	#31
Correct me if I am wrong but the documents Eric Holder is not turning over are documents	SoutherDem	Jun 2012	#2
+ 1. A Republican wet dream, to be blunt. Applaud Holder.	Hoyt	Jun 2012	#3
here's a Fri. hardball interview on this	wordpix	Jun 2012	#28
Let's have a national contempt vote for Issa. n/t	EFerrari	Jun 2012	#4
"additional records as promised" - Issa BS.	Bolo Boffin	Jun 2012	#5
AG Holder is under no obligation to turn them over, and Rep. Issa is out-of-line demanding them.	DRoseDARs	Jun 2012	#6
Postpone = "Do him to shoot you now or wait 'til you get home?"	no_hypocrisy	Jun 2012	#7
Tsk, Issa blinked. nt	bemildred	Jun 2012	#9
Isn't the DoJ tooo busy looking into car thieves and frisking Congress critters for illegal Uzzis?	L. Coyote	Jun 2012	#10
Ban guns and the NRA(aka the extremists)and put Holder on the Supreme Court	graham4anything	Jun 2012	#11
Yes, by all means. And as soon as we have all their guns, banning speech, religion and	24601	Jun 2012	#13
One cannot yell fire in a theater	graham4anything	Jun 2012	#15
All rights exist by default under our lystem	slackmaster	Jun 2012	#16
without rules you have anarchy	graham4anything	Jun 2012	#17
Who do you believe is suggesting there should be NO rules?	slackmaster	Jun 2012	#18
Would you believe...	graham4anything	Jun 2012	#22
Of course you can yell fire in a theater - Iv'e been in one when it was yelled. If you falsely	24601	Jun 2012	#19
No doubt you really meant to say "they" should ban ALL guns...	slackmaster	Jun 2012	#14
NRA behind this issue b/c REAL prob is flood of thousands of illegal guns across border	wordpix	Jun 2012	#30
Issa must be realizing that the program did not start under the Obama administration.	JDPriestly	Jun 2012	#12
Vietnam didn't have to start under Johnson to drive him from running again. It's not what	24601	Jun 2012	#20
but it took a gun(or two) to kill RFK, JFK, MLK, etc.	graham4anything	Jun 2012	#21
Specifically three - two rifles and one pistol. But Teddy would have needed to be driving a VW.	24601	Jun 2012	#25
bad analogy b/c there was no cover up here! Holder stopped FnF as soon as he learned about it	wordpix	Jun 2012	#27
Why doesn't he just postpone it until after the election?	eringer	Jun 2012	#23
I wouldn't want to miss this opportunity to say	vanlassie	Jun 2012	#24
Issa's own ATF witness testifying said lax US gun laws are mostly to blame for the deaths	wordpix	Jun 2012	#26
I wish he would go ahead. This would be a turning point for many folks on the fence.	nanabugg	Jun 2012	#32

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.