HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Jerry Sandusky Penn State... » Reply #20
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Reply #20


Response to AngryAmish (Reply #9)

Tue Jun 12, 2012, 05:11 PM

20. State-law limitations need not be applied if a racketeering activity (such as sports bribery) can be

 

proven. 18 USC 1964.

Sports bribery and other predicate acts are listed 18 USC 1961.

It would, of course, be up an attorney making a claim the the civil RICO provisions are applicable to describe the facts constituting the predicate acts.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 25 replies Author Time Post
kpete Jun 2012 OP
liberal N proud Jun 2012 #1
Blue_Tires Jun 2012 #13
SoutherDem Jun 2012 #2
lookingfortruth Jun 2012 #3
drm604 Jun 2012 #14
LynneSin Jun 2012 #18
no_hypocrisy Jun 2012 #4
rhett o rick Jun 2012 #6
AngryAmish Jun 2012 #9
LineLineLineNew Reply State-law limitations need not be applied if a racketeering activity (such as sports bribery) can be
AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2012 #20
alcibiades_mystery Jun 2012 #5
rhett o rick Jun 2012 #7
Pauline89 Jun 2012 #8
Kingofalldems Jun 2012 #10
MADem Jun 2012 #12
atreides1 Jun 2012 #15
MADem Jun 2012 #16
Spazito Jun 2012 #21
MADem Jun 2012 #22
Spazito Jun 2012 #23
MADem Jun 2012 #24
yardwork Jun 2012 #11
LynneSin Jun 2012 #17
KeepItReal Jun 2012 #19
DCKit Jun 2012 #25
Please login to view edit histories.