Reply #9

In the discussion thread: John Edwards trial jurors: Panel majority wanted to acquit [View all]

Fri Jun 1, 2012, 06:58 PM

9. agreed.

and from what he said after the acquittal, it sounds like he's heading that way. He admitted he has done terrible wrongs. Not criminal, but terribly wrong. No equivocation or non-apologies for anyone he may have wronged.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

16 replies	Author	Time	Post
John Edwards trial jurors: Panel majority wanted to acquit [View all]	alp227	Jun 2012	OP
He never should have been prosecuted	lark	Jun 2012	#1
Agree! They have lots of real criminals out there that need to be prosecuted, go get some those.	teddy51	Jun 2012	#2
It was a total waste of time and $$$.	BlueIris	Jun 2012	#3
WTF - so glad for the fail, they deserved it!!!!	AlbertCat	Jun 2012	#5
3 dumba$$ jurors employing "faith based" thinking	NoodleyAppendage	Jun 2012	#4
Looks to me like they said the prosecution failed to carry its burden of proof.	The Stranger	Jun 2012	#6
I truly hope	amuse bouche	Jun 2012	#7
You will not get a jury of peers	marions ghost	Jun 2012	#15
I concur with fellow DU'ers who feel there are far greater criminals that need prosecution.	mother earth	Jun 2012	#8
agreed.	magical thyme	Jun 2012	#9
nt	mother earth	Jun 2012	#11
I think John Edwards probably is the man he could have been, should have been and would have been --	1monster	Jun 2012	#16
It bugs the hell out of me that he was being held criminally accountable	GoddessOfGuinness	Jun 2012	#10
Absolutely!	mother earth	Jun 2012	#12
Bush (R). Edwards (D). Don't you get the difference?	Suji to Seoul	Jun 2012	#13
A breach of ethics (with the wrong timing) could have destroyed a Democratic	marions ghost	Jun 2012	#14

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.