Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: John Edwards 'not guilty' on one count; mistrial declared on remaining charges [View all]AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)12. You're right, Holder had nothing to do with it. He also has had nothing to do with prosecuting
banksters, admitted war criminals, or those illegally purging the voter rolls to suppress votes for Democrats.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
John Edwards 'not guilty' on one count; mistrial declared on remaining charges [View all]
onehandle
May 2012
OP
What did Holder have to do with it? I must have missed something. I thought this was a state trial.
freshwest
May 2012
#5
You're right, Holder had nothing to do with it. He also has had nothing to do with prosecuting
AnotherMcIntosh
May 2012
#12
You'd think this would have been easy for a jury to decide. If the donors paid the
24601
May 2012
#32
It did for me too but you have to remember Edwards was an incredible trial lawyer
underpants
May 2012
#29
During the trial, I heard one commentator say, "Remember, Edwards is the best lawyer in the room."
SomeGuyInEagan
Jun 2012
#38