Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: John Edwards 'not guilty' on one count; mistrial declared on remaining charges [View all]Scairp
(2,749 posts)7. What a complete waste
This was a shit case and I don't see a retrial. Glad it's over.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
John Edwards 'not guilty' on one count; mistrial declared on remaining charges [View all]
onehandle
May 2012
OP
What did Holder have to do with it? I must have missed something. I thought this was a state trial.
freshwest
May 2012
#5
You're right, Holder had nothing to do with it. He also has had nothing to do with prosecuting
AnotherMcIntosh
May 2012
#12
You'd think this would have been easy for a jury to decide. If the donors paid the
24601
May 2012
#32
It did for me too but you have to remember Edwards was an incredible trial lawyer
underpants
May 2012
#29
During the trial, I heard one commentator say, "Remember, Edwards is the best lawyer in the room."
SomeGuyInEagan
Jun 2012
#38