Reply #63

In the discussion thread: Report: Obama Personally Oversees Al-Qaeda ‘Kill List’ [View all]

Response to may3rd (Reply #50)

Wed May 30, 2012, 01:39 AM

boppers (16,588 posts)

63. The facebook guy? Mark?

I think you might have your facts confused.

Did you mean Eduardo Saverin?

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

80 replies	Author	Time	Post
Report: Obama Personally Oversees Al-Qaeda ‘Kill List’ [View all]	Hissyspit	May 2012	OP
I don't know, people.	mahatmakanejeeves	May 2012	#1
This story is viral today. n/t	EFerrari	May 2012	#2
This comment from William Daley in the article is very odd...	KoKo	May 2012	#3
“At what point are you just filling the bucket with numbers?”	frylock	May 2012	#16
Well, actually, in a drone attack, the driver, the car,	dixiegrrrrl	May 2012	#20
An war al-Alack	may3rd	May 2012	#49
Also made the list.......	DeSwiss	May 2012	#23
I wonder if Zuckerburg is on the kill list	may3rd	May 2012	#50
The facebook guy? Mark?	boppers	May 2012	#63
Well 'duh'! He IS the Commander in Chief (CIC)!	NoMittens	May 2012	#4
I've been assuming he approves the list	Enrique	May 2012	#7
It's hard to dismiss this as a RW Attack...this part from the Article:	KoKo	May 2012	#29
"A colleague" is not an identifiable person...	Ohio Joe	May 2012	#40
"shunned", "metastasizing", "lawyering", "ferocious"....	boppers	May 2012	#43
He's not the Don-in-Chief.	rug	May 2012	#52
No, the news is that there is a Presidential Kill List at all.	Occulus	May 2012	#56
Where there's a war, there's a list	bhikkhu	May 2012	#59
America is at war? When did Congress declare war?	Neue Regel	May 2012	#80
There's always been one, especially during war time.	boppers	May 2012	#65
there was nothing about a kill list on the Nobel Peace Prize nomination form n/t...	IamK	May 2012	#5
Well said.	dixiegrrrrl	May 2012	#19
K&R. nt	OnyxCollie	May 2012	#6
I don't like that there's a kill list to begin with	Lawlbringer	May 2012	#8
According to to an NPR newsbroadcast on this earlier today...	Demoiselle	May 2012	#34
That was mentioned on the radio. The idea of micro managing individuals	may3rd	May 2012	#47
...as opposed to turning a blind eye	bhikkhu	May 2012	#9
Don't ever trust a politician	rusty fender	May 2012	#10
I always consider the older alternative to drones in war	bhikkhu	May 2012	#11
Really? It's one or the other?	Hissyspit	May 2012	#14
No, its not one or the other	bhikkhu	May 2012	#51
dunno about that	may3rd	May 2012	#48
If you don't trust any of them, then what do you propose we do?	treestar	May 2012	#17
Congratulations on your dawning enlightenment!	whatchamacallit	May 2012	#18
Should we trust	mollerjay	May 2012	#27
You can ALWAYS count on Obama!	Poll_Blind	May 2012	#12
this is bad how?	scheming daemons	May 2012	#13
AND BREAKING NEWS	Iliyah	May 2012	#15
At least it's not Rmoney who oversees it...	Amonester	May 2012	#21
Silly point of view.	rayofreason	May 2012	#25
+1000000	FiveGoodMen	May 2012	#35
Yeah because it matters to the dead who ordered them killed without trial. n/t	EFerrari	May 2012	#55
As many said in this thread, that list is nothing new...	Amonester	May 2012	#70
In your zeal to defend the indefensible, you are overlooking the facts.	EFerrari	May 2012	#73
Why isn't there anyone challenging the legality of this kill list?	The Northerner	May 2012	#22
Everyone's afraid. n/t	DeSwiss	May 2012	#24
Could find yourself on the list. n/t	rayofreason	May 2012	#26
Sick of the unfair attackeson Obama	mollerjay	May 2012	#28
How is it unfair?	morningfog	May 2012	#31
Hopefully Obama or his campaign will respond properly to this NYT article	KoKo	May 2012	#32
Got a problem with the ''Due Process'' clause in the Bill of Rights, have you? :-/ n/t	DeSwiss	May 2012	#33
Due process, in this case, means:	boppers	May 2012	#45
No it doesn't, that's bs.	EFerrari	May 2012	#54
If you're old enough to fire a weapon, you're old enough to be a target.	boppers	May 2012	#62
Comparing this to WWII	U4ikLefty	May 2012	#64
Lets see:	boppers	May 2012	#66
You really outdid yourself this time.	Ash_F	May 2012	#69
Exactly.	boppers	May 2012	#77
Name me the top ten strikes on the US, ranked by fatalities.	boppers	May 2012	#79
And you think you know that, why?	EFerrari	May 2012	#72
Well, people told you he was killed, why did you believe that?	boppers	May 2012	#78
and keeping in mind, congress did legally authorize military force against Al Qaeda	bhikkhu	May 2012	#57
I don't really see it as a war but a law enforcement issue	Ash_F	May 2012	#71
I do remember that argument	bhikkhu	May 2012	#75
Unbelievable!	pmorlan1	May 2012	#68
I grew up with this.	boppers	May 2012	#76
You've been here four days. n/t	EFerrari	May 2012	#37
now go run tell mommy	frylock	May 2012	#42
He's dead, Jim. n/t	EFerrari	May 2012	#44
The only people who have standing are assassinated when they are found.	morningfog	May 2012	#30
Nope--the DOJ admitted that custody would pre-empt any lethal force.....	msanthrope	May 2012	#39
ACLU filed and abandoned one case last year. Filed another one in February:	EFerrari	May 2012	#36
Because those who have standing to do so are terrorists who do not participate in a	msanthrope	May 2012	#38
oppose it and your on it... Barack is like Tony Soprano n/t	IamK	May 2012	#41
This is news, how?	boppers	May 2012	#46
Wrong.	EFerrari	May 2012	#53
I probably shrugged upon hearing about Bush/Cheney doing it, too.	boppers	May 2012	#61
Good!	tabasco	May 2012	#58
They've been reined in.	boppers	May 2012	#67
It's not awfully top secret if the French are reporting it	Rosa Luxemburg	May 2012	#60
U.S. military trainers trickle back into Pakistan "Overseer in chief has boots on the ground	may3rd	May 2012	#74

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.