Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tabatha

(18,795 posts)
11. The "West" is not looking for war.
Tue May 29, 2012, 11:36 AM
May 2012

That is why the "West"/Obama have bent over backwards trying to find a diplomatic solution.

War with whom - Iran, Russia?
You must be joking or live in tin foil hat country.

This is working out better than planned. We now have pro and anti-regime militias killing civilians leveymg May 2012 #1
Anti-regime militias killing civilians? For example? DetlefK May 2012 #2
I guess you don't count al-Qaeda bombers as a militia. leveymg May 2012 #3
No, I don't, because they don't fight for either cause. DetlefK May 2012 #4
Syria is the site of the current round of Saudi Arabia' s Jihad against western leveymg May 2012 #5
Oh, you are wrong on that one. DetlefK May 2012 #18
Because al-Zawahiri isn't head of al-Qaeda. leveymg May 2012 #32
I thought the Syrian Ba'athists were Alawite, not Shi'a. Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #33
The Alawite are a Shi'ia sect. leveymg May 2012 #34
pro-regime militias carried out most of the killings. may3rd May 2012 #58
You spout complete and utter nonsense. tabatha May 2012 #13
ok well tell us then who are the good guys in Syria? and no the civilian population here does not azurnoir May 2012 #20
You have provided an opinion. tabatha May 2012 #35
There are no good guys, except for the victims. Many of those counted as victims, though, are leveymg May 2012 #37
These were certainly Assad's thugs. Odin2005 May 2012 #24
Who benefits from this killing? One side is trying to make the other side look bad riderinthestorm May 2012 #6
Try listening to the children who witnessed the crimes. tabatha May 2012 #7
Honestly, Ma'am, Get With The Program: Hostile To U.S. Equals Good; Only The U.S. Does Evil Deeds The Magistrate May 2012 #9
Thank you. tabatha May 2012 #10
Nobody's trying to whitewash Assad. He's a bloody, murderous thug dictator. riderinthestorm May 2012 #14
I follow this daily. tabatha May 2012 #36
I follow it daily as well and the west doesn't want to get involved because forcibly removing Assad riderinthestorm May 2012 #41
a bit of an overstatement does friendly to the US then equate to good? azurnoir May 2012 #22
Depends On How Manichean Your View Of Things Is, Ma'am The Magistrate May 2012 #30
well you've got it -by jove or Jove azurnoir May 2012 #50
That Has a Lot Of Moving Parts, Ma'am The Magistrate May 2012 #55
ah but the difference between our respective comments is could vs can azurnoir May 2012 #57
Isn't that what is called a "straw man?" David__77 May 2012 #26
More A Rule Of Thumb, Sir, Whose Predictive Value Has Been Solidly Established Over Time The Magistrate May 2012 #29
Yeah, that sort of thing drives me up the wall. Posteritatis May 2012 #45
there is something else playing here too, what country is Syria's ally? azurnoir May 2012 #8
The "West" is not looking for war. tabatha May 2012 #11
Of course they are!! Why do you think Israel is about to strike Iran? riderinthestorm May 2012 #15
Netanyahu wants war. Most of Israel and most military leaders in Israel do not. tabatha May 2012 #38
Leon Panetta already said its going to happen. I believe him. riderinthestorm May 2012 #42
Yawn. Israel's been "about to strike Iran" any minute now around here for ten years. (nt) Posteritatis May 2012 #44
Except of course, they actually HAVE bombed Iran's nuclear facilities before (Osirak) riderinthestorm May 2012 #53
Does It End With An 'N', Sir, Or With A 'Q'.... The Magistrate May 2012 #56
In a hurry and on a cell; my bad. i can hardly see the letters! riderinthestorm May 2012 #59
really ? Obama is being election year expedient however what we are told is America's 'bestest' azurnoir May 2012 #16
So people have to shut up about atrocities of other human beings. tabatha May 2012 #39
no of course not however also be careful when backing a side in this too azurnoir May 2012 #52
Absolutely. All of your questions and more. riderinthestorm May 2012 #12
The question here isnot who the 'bad guy's' are in Syria it's azurnoir May 2012 #17
First casualty in armed conflict is the truth harun May 2012 #19
Yes those countries are involved one way or another Harmony Blue May 2012 #21
Russia is giving Assad the arms to commit his crimes Their statement is the blandest possible riderinthestorm May 2012 #31
No, Russia is giving Assad the arms to restore Harmony Blue May 2012 #47
I'm not defending this. FWIW, Russian arms support comes with no conditions riderinthestorm May 2012 #49
I don't agree at all Harmony Blue May 2012 #51
You don't seem to realize Assad is Shia. Yes an Alawite Shia but when it comes to Islam riderinthestorm May 2012 #54
The looters benefit. joshcryer May 2012 #61
Assad has more blood on his hands. Odin2005 May 2012 #23
Yeah, it sure seem that way Harmony Blue May 2012 #25
"Any government in any country bears responsibility for the security..." David__77 May 2012 #27
Post removed Post removed May 2012 #28
"Those Children belonged to those who recently were shooting and Killing American Soldiers.. " tabatha May 2012 #40
Liberals arguing that the U.S. should give weapons to Syrian rebels underestimate Assad's power Douglas Carpenter May 2012 #43
Yup. Maybe you can get through where the rest of us cannot riderinthestorm May 2012 #46
I wouldn't be surprised Harmony Blue May 2012 #48
I would hope no one... SkyDaddy7 May 2012 #60
Syria's Bad Logic TheRazorOnline May 2012 #62
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Syria crisis: Most Houla ...»Reply #11