Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
Showing Original Post only (View all)Bernie Sanders Reaches New High in Support: Poll [View all]
Source: NBC News
Read more: http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/poll-hillary-clinton-holds-steady-support-among-democrats-n466641
I'm not someone who puts much faith in nationwide polling in a primary race, especially when the first votes to be cast are still months away, but I'm glad to see steady progress.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
128 replies, 11238 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (83)
ReplyReply to this post
128 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gaps before Biden decides against running = 45%, 22%, 24%, 12%, 14%. Gaps after Biden = 20%, 16%
Attorney in Texas
Nov 2015
#8
That was the sympathy reaction to the Benghazi hearings that gave Hillary a boost.
JDPriestly
Nov 2015
#58
If it was a "sympathy reaction", why did Sanders' number go down as well as hers up?
George II
Nov 2015
#80
The asterisks for the withdrawal of Biden and Webb are missing from your numbers.
JDPriestly
Nov 2015
#90
Thanks - I originally had all the events lumped together, then broke them up around the dates....
George II
Nov 2015
#92
As I explained in another post, the polls do not measure the enthusiasm that makes the difference.
JDPriestly
Nov 2015
#93
Clinton got a sympathy boost after the Benghazi hearing, and now we are back to Bernie
JDPriestly
Nov 2015
#56
At this rate, he will catch up with Hillary two years after she wins Iowa in 10 weeks. nt
onehandle
Nov 2015
#4
Q: Who said “Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it”? A: Not Hillary Clinton
Attorney in Texas
Nov 2015
#14
Clinton is also consistently not prefered with liberal pundits. But media and GOP pundits love her.
Bubzer
Nov 2015
#48
Really? Last time listened to her show, she was heavily talking up Bernie sanders.
Bubzer
Nov 2015
#61
The Brunch with Bernie segments seem to be happening infrequently now... which is understandable.
Bubzer
Nov 2015
#88
And yet, when I go out and talk to voters as I campaign for Bernie, I see no enthusiastic
JDPriestly
Nov 2015
#62
But if he gains, it is likely that she will lose an equal amount. So . . . . . .
JDPriestly
Nov 2015
#59
Clinton's polling trend line looks worse than it did in 2007; Sanders' looks better than Obama 2007.
Attorney in Texas
Nov 2015
#15
As has been pointed out, Sanders does not have the resources of Barack Obama...
brooklynite
Nov 2015
#39
A more valid argument is Hillary has paid for numerous polls, so of course they will favor her.
Bubzer
Nov 2015
#54
Agreed. I'm thrilled to vote Sanders in the primary. I hope I get the chance to vote Sanders in the
Attorney in Texas
Nov 2015
#20
Nice try! It suggests Sanders eclipsed the huge bump Clinton got when Biden decided against running
Attorney in Texas
Nov 2015
#24
Any single data point might be just "noise," but Clinton consistently polled in the upper 60s for
Attorney in Texas
Nov 2015
#79
Yes, they do. Not NEARLY as good as they looked for Hillary Clinton in 2007, but still quite good
Attorney in Texas
Nov 2015
#99
Not at all. I fear history is repeating itself. Clinton's the front-runner; Sanders the underdog.
Attorney in Texas
Nov 2015
#103
Of course Hillary didn't lose the general election.. she wasnt in it. There is no history there.
DCBob
Nov 2015
#104
No she didn't lose the general election because her collapse came just in time for us to nominate
Attorney in Texas
Nov 2015
#105
She folded like a cheap card table, but feel free to spin whatever revisionist tales you want to
Attorney in Texas
Nov 2015
#114
So ... "but for the democratic process, she would have been crowned in 2008?" But for Ronald Reagan
Attorney in Texas
Nov 2015
#117
Rick Santorum keeps saying that, too. Literally, if you were doomed to listen to his stump speeches,
Attorney in Texas
Nov 2015
#120
Consider that Bernie is the first feasible candidate in generations who is not a Reaganite.
immoderate
Nov 2015
#109
You got me. But it's close. McGovern is timed out of there. But was he feasible? (Really loved him.)
immoderate
Nov 2015
#128
Well, yes but Iowa looks like a big win for Hillary.. unless you think the polls are bogus.
DCBob
Nov 2015
#89
Definitely plenty of time. In past primaries, they lead has flipped back and forth multiple times in
Attorney in Texas
Nov 2015
#108
Usually happens in December or January or February. Be patient, grasshopper, and watch it unfold
Attorney in Texas
Nov 2015
#111