Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

ericson00

(2,707 posts)
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 06:23 PM Nov 2015

Schumer: Refugee pause may be necessary [View all]

Last edited Wed Nov 18, 2015, 07:27 PM - Edit history (1)

Source: The Hill

Sen. Charles Schumer (N.Y.), the third ranking member of the Senate Democratic leadership, on Tuesday said it may be necessary to halt the resettlement of Syrian refugees in the United States.
...

Schumer, however, declined to take the option off the table ahead of a special briefing scheduled for Wednesday afternoon on the process that is now used to vet refugees entering the United States.
“We’re waiting for the briefing tomorrow, a pause may be necessary. We’re going to look at it,” he said.

Schumer is widely expected to become leader of Senate Democrats in the next Congress, after Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (Nev.) retires.
...
Centrist Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin (W.Va.) signed a letter to President Obama Monday calling on him not to allow another Syrian refugee into the country unless federal authorities can guarantee with 100-percent assurance they are not connected to the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/260471-schumer-refugee-pause-may-be-necessary



I caution you all to hold your fire at Schumer: Americans at least are on his side by almost 2:1, and more than 2:1 if you add "Christian refugees only" to "none at all" (which makes sense because the obvious fear is jihadism).

Proud to call him my Senator! This issue needs reason and a measured approach, not anyone's jerking knees, right or left
79 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Great, now our guys are joining in the fun BarstowCowboy Nov 2015 #1
Oh don't be a damn coward Schumer... gcomeau Nov 2015 #2
Exactly. BarstowCowboy Nov 2015 #4
Well said. I totally agree! mimi85 Nov 2015 #66
Figures. I hope he is posturing....again. Darb Nov 2015 #3
Nothing wrong with re-examination. 840high Nov 2015 #5
Are you serious? BarstowCowboy Nov 2015 #6
I am serious. 840high Nov 2015 #8
If you're really serious, then please explain what it'll take to make you feel safe. BarstowCowboy Nov 2015 #11
I welcome true refugees. Nothing wrong in 840high Nov 2015 #20
How much do we know about the vetting process? BarstowCowboy Nov 2015 #21
Our government has lied to us before. My 840high Nov 2015 #25
So they would deliberately let in terrorists? treestar Nov 2015 #53
They would lie how good the vetting is. 840high Nov 2015 #64
for what reason? treestar Nov 2015 #71
How quaint: Someone who trusts the government without question. Nihil Nov 2015 #41
So then the government should not provide any social programs either right? treestar Nov 2015 #52
Let me know when you return from Planet Random-Tangent and we can discuss *this* subject. (n/t) Nihil Nov 2015 #54
Just months before the Paris attack, high ranking officials B2G Nov 2015 #55
I think it's not of this Planet treestar Nov 2015 #72
I'd like to know more about the christx30 Nov 2015 #30
Good questions. 840high Nov 2015 #35
Yeah there is information about that, but people prefer to run off half cocked treestar Nov 2015 #73
I'm with Schumer on this one. eom Purveyor Nov 2015 #7
Then you might as well say you're with Trump on it too. BarstowCowboy Nov 2015 #9
soon, given public opinion, as well as the awakening ericson00 Nov 2015 #10
If we don't accept them, where will they go? BarstowCowboy Nov 2015 #14
for one, right now they are in much closer proximity to Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Sudan, ericson00 Nov 2015 #19
If those countries were going to take them in, they'd have indicated so already BarstowCowboy Nov 2015 #23
Me too. bigwillq Nov 2015 #37
So here's an idea: Myrina Nov 2015 #49
Sounds good (nt) bigwillq Nov 2015 #57
This wish was answered a long time ago. Defense/Homeland Security makes up 16.2% of the federal 24601 Nov 2015 #63
Fuck Chuck. nt geek tragedy Nov 2015 #12
I wonder who got to him. BarstowCowboy Nov 2015 #15
he's not any kind of leader, period. nt geek tragedy Nov 2015 #18
Schumer has a violent hatred for Muslims. He's always been this way. Scootaloo Nov 2015 #26
I don't question you, but I'd like to see proof of Schumer's hatred. Ouray Nov 2015 #38
The illogic of this is simply amazing markpkessinger Nov 2015 #13
Finally, someone who else gets it. BarstowCowboy Nov 2015 #16
calling Manchin a "centrist" is like calling Ben Carson "qualified to be president" DebbieCDC Nov 2015 #17
Wrong, and anyone who joins him is wrong as they could be. n/t Jefferson23 Nov 2015 #22
Schumer is simply viewing this issue from a political perspective. goldent Nov 2015 #24
You get it. FLPanhandle Nov 2015 #29
Good for him, slooow down the train! Maybe chuck can talk Obama into 'x months process review' 4139 Nov 2015 #27
2 - 10 years isn't a slow enough "train" for you? Myrina Nov 2015 #48
So we aren't getting refugees until November 2017 to 2025 yeoman6987 Nov 2015 #77
Fuck Chuck. Measured enough? truebrit71 Nov 2015 #28
Schumer is right hollowdweller Nov 2015 #31
agreed. Obama is too academic, and thats a common reason ericson00 Nov 2015 #32
Wets finger, raises it into the air ... Babel_17 Nov 2015 #33
A principled stand christx30 Nov 2015 #50
Good for Schumer Reter Nov 2015 #34
That's one reason Trump is so popular. 840high Nov 2015 #36
thankfully, the story that more Dems are questioning the knee-jerk PC stuff is gaining steam ericson00 Nov 2015 #39
Is it wrong to review the refugee screening process? Democat Nov 2015 #40
It's political and the cold reality is goldent Nov 2015 #43
Schumer is the next Democratic Senate Leader Freddie Stubbs Nov 2015 #42
In which way? goldent Nov 2015 #44
Ugh! (Dislike.) NurseJackie Nov 2015 #45
2 to 10 years is the time it already takes for a refugee to make it inside the US. That's plenty of Sunlei Nov 2015 #46
2-10 years? B2G Nov 2015 #56
Schumer needs to pause and consider retirement. Myrina Nov 2015 #47
The law already allows the President to determine a number treestar Nov 2015 #51
Schumer is funded by Wall Street JonathanRackham Nov 2015 #58
Read the Refugee Act, Chuck....Not your call. Take your fear and shove it. EndElectoral Nov 2015 #59
It's really unpopular with the American people. christx30 Nov 2015 #60
If these were Jewish refugees fleeing Germany in WW2, would he feel the same? EndElectoral Nov 2015 #61
Convince the 53% of the American people of these things. christx30 Nov 2015 #62
Well, we can love Anne Frank now,but the Frank family was denied refugee status and a visa to the US EndElectoral Nov 2015 #74
But Obama is just one man, out of the population christx30 Nov 2015 #78
That was apparently the case in the late 30s. blackspade Nov 2015 #69
Oh, for fuck sake. blackspade Nov 2015 #65
2:1 ratio of public opinion, yet the media is for letting them all in. ericson00 Nov 2015 #67
Oh, please. blackspade Nov 2015 #68
We need to frame this better than we're currently doing Babel_17 Nov 2015 #70
I don't care if Americans are 10 to 1 on Schumer's side . . . markpkessinger Nov 2015 #75
PANDY , THE PANDER PANDA IS AWARDED TO CHUCK (The pander master) SCHUMER !! seaotter Nov 2015 #76
Political cowardice nt Cognitive_Resonance Nov 2015 #79
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Schumer: Refugee pause ma...