Reply #42

In the discussion thread: Marshall says 'sodomy is not a civil right' [View all]

Thu May 17, 2012, 07:30 PM

AlbertCat (10,450 posts)

42. I'm on the battlefield and have to concentrate on the enemy 600 yards away

Now, why on Earth would he think the gay soldier isn't trying to do the same thing instead of checking out his fat ass? The gay soldier is in danger from YOU, Bob, if you would be so irrationally distracted in such a situation! Your homophobia is harmful to the platoon! We cannot allow homophobes to serve!

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

69 replies	Author	Time	Post
Marshall says 'sodomy is not a civil right' [View all]	swimboy	May 2012	OP
see how these repukes are?	Skittles	May 2012	#1
+1	Solly Mack	May 2012	#7
And this guy can discriminate any time he wishes.	asjr	May 2012	#29
he cannot see gay people beyond their sex lives,	AlbertCat	May 2012	#37
They are denying intelligence and talent in favor of their own cult of stupidity. What a waste.	freshwest	May 2012	#66
Huh? What?	liberal N proud	May 2012	#2
The conservatives in the 60s were totally sure equality for blacks wasn't a civil right either.	phantom power	May 2012	#3
This clown needs a fist in his face...	Blue_Tires	May 2012	#4
So does anyone who votes for him.	FiveGoodMen	May 2012	#11
Or he wants one...er...someplace else...	Ken Burch	May 2012	#40
Let's see, who is the real activist here?	Dont call me Shirley	May 2012	#5
Right to privacy, pursuit of happiness...	truthisfreedom	May 2012	#6
I had no idea	gratuitous	May 2012	#8
$5 says that guy was wearing diapers, a butt plug, and/or a studded leather cock harness	XemaSab	May 2012	#9
Probably, but I really do not want to find out.	47of74	May 2012	#15
Oh, I do	XemaSab	May 2012	#16
The point being, that the gov't shouldn't find out if WE have plugs...	Bucky	May 2012	#19
Isn't it a right to have the government out of your bedroom?	lunatica	May 2012	#10
It is not in the realm of government to oversee what is done sexually in private between consenting	The Wielding Truth	May 2012	#23
In that sex is a form of expression between two folks, wouldn't it come under "freedom of speech"?	marble falls	May 2012	#12
Yes, it's the freedom to ASSociate.	montanto	May 2012	#13
It likely was discussed in the court's "Oral Argument", but not all sodomy is Anal.	24601	May 2012	#21
Welll what was that study awhile back	cindyperry2010	May 2012	#14
Or not. I think that's generalization that can't be made.	HERVEPA	May 2012	#58
Thank you very much.	swimboy	May 2012	#59
Virginia Conservatives are in an unholy alliance with this woman:	swimboy	May 2012	#17
There is USSC precedent that is on point. "Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003)	24601	May 2012	#18
I was going to say that too	SoutherDem	May 2012	#20
Correct.	chollybocker	May 2012	#31
In GOP land, there is no "right" to anything legal if it makes some	beac	May 2012	#53
The same is soon to happen with gay marriage, as well.	joshcryer	May 2012	#61
He thinks gay guys will 'eye' him in the foxhole. What a doofus.	CurtEastPoint	May 2012	#22
I like how even in hatred, their ego is big enough to think they are irresistable to gay men	Blue_Tires	May 2012	#35
Or, perhaps, they're afraid that they AREN'T.	Ken Burch	May 2012	#41
Or anybody else for that matter.	smirkymonkey	May 2012	#69
I'm on the battlefield and have to concentrate on the enemy 600 yards away	AlbertCat	May 2012	#42
lol. i love how the same states and the same people pretend that the were pro-civil rights	La Lioness Priyanka	May 2012	#24
And a lot of times they just replaced communist/black/etc...	47of74	May 2012	#25
IMO these people are also trying to wedge african americans vs gays but they	La Lioness Priyanka	May 2012	#27
Maybe not PUBLIC sodomy	slackmaster	May 2012	#26
Stupidity is not a civil right, either.	Faygo Kid	May 2012	#28
What a gutless fucker.	tabasco	May 2012	#30
He can't have oral sex anymore?	Fearless	May 2012	#32
something I'm sure Mrs Marshall can attest to	azurnoir	May 2012	#33
wanna bet he sodomizes Mrs. Marshall?	provis99	May 2012	#43
well I'm sure that	azurnoir	May 2012	#47
But it's okay as long as they aren't gay for each other	cindyperry2010	May 2012	#55
Video:	Laughing Mirror	May 2012	#34
Actually, it is	bluestateguy	May 2012	#36
Time to start the pool on how long it'll be 'til this guy gets caught with a rent boy at Motel 6	Ken Burch	May 2012	#38
Look, I think Marshall is a tool, but I see a repetitive pattern in your posts that is off the mark.	swimboy	May 2012	#52
OK.	Ken Burch	May 2012	#54
Sodomy is not just a male-on-male thing. Does this freak think he can legislate	kestrel91316	May 2012	#39
I know. This stupid jerkoff doesn't know he's talking about oral sex	RainDog	May 2012	#65
a clumsy straight guy could easily commit a felony and not know it.	yurbud	May 2012	#68
A lot of married men (straight)	HockeyMom	May 2012	#44
But he LOVES girl-on-girl porn	1Greensix	May 2012	#45
To them, girl-on-girl sex is not homosexual.	mikeytherat	May 2012	#57
It seems pretty self evident to me...	Salviati	May 2012	#46
So, should we ban from the bench anyone who has ever given or received a blow-job?	Ian David	May 2012	#48
Fascism, bigotry, and oppression are not, but that doesn't stop you, Marshall. n/t	jtuck004	May 2012	#49
I know that old saw, but sex is sex...	Flubadubya	May 2012	#50
So judges are in the business of judging sexual acts of other judges.	undeterred	May 2012	#51
these people must lie awake at night thinking about that awful AWFUL gay sex..	frylock	May 2012	#56
Neither is playing World of Warcraft naked.	sofa king	May 2012	#60
Sounds like the pursuit of happiness to me...	PurityOfEssence	May 2012	#62
This is why we can't listen to those voices that tell us Dems = Repukes. It's already started here.	Tarheel_Dem	May 2012	#63
It's a constitutional right	RainDog	May 2012	#64
The way I do it, it should be. nt	Poll_Blind	May 2012	#67

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.