Reply #34

In the discussion thread: Marshall says 'sodomy is not a civil right' [View all]

Response to swimboy (Original post)

Thu May 17, 2012, 07:10 PM

Laughing Mirror (3,746 posts)

34. Video:

http://cnn.com/video/?/video/bestoftv/2012/05/17/exp-point-marshall-long.cnn

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

69 replies	Author	Time	Post
Marshall says 'sodomy is not a civil right' [View all]	swimboy	May 2012	OP
see how these repukes are?	Skittles	May 2012	#1
+1	Solly Mack	May 2012	#7
And this guy can discriminate any time he wishes.	asjr	May 2012	#29
he cannot see gay people beyond their sex lives,	AlbertCat	May 2012	#37
They are denying intelligence and talent in favor of their own cult of stupidity. What a waste.	freshwest	May 2012	#66
Huh? What?	liberal N proud	May 2012	#2
The conservatives in the 60s were totally sure equality for blacks wasn't a civil right either.	phantom power	May 2012	#3
This clown needs a fist in his face...	Blue_Tires	May 2012	#4
So does anyone who votes for him.	FiveGoodMen	May 2012	#11
Or he wants one...er...someplace else...	Ken Burch	May 2012	#40
Let's see, who is the real activist here?	Dont call me Shirley	May 2012	#5
Right to privacy, pursuit of happiness...	truthisfreedom	May 2012	#6
I had no idea	gratuitous	May 2012	#8
$5 says that guy was wearing diapers, a butt plug, and/or a studded leather cock harness	XemaSab	May 2012	#9
Probably, but I really do not want to find out.	47of74	May 2012	#15
Oh, I do	XemaSab	May 2012	#16
The point being, that the gov't shouldn't find out if WE have plugs...	Bucky	May 2012	#19
Isn't it a right to have the government out of your bedroom?	lunatica	May 2012	#10
It is not in the realm of government to oversee what is done sexually in private between consenting	The Wielding Truth	May 2012	#23
In that sex is a form of expression between two folks, wouldn't it come under "freedom of speech"?	marble falls	May 2012	#12
Yes, it's the freedom to ASSociate.	montanto	May 2012	#13
It likely was discussed in the court's "Oral Argument", but not all sodomy is Anal.	24601	May 2012	#21
Welll what was that study awhile back	cindyperry2010	May 2012	#14
Or not. I think that's generalization that can't be made.	HERVEPA	May 2012	#58
Thank you very much.	swimboy	May 2012	#59
Virginia Conservatives are in an unholy alliance with this woman:	swimboy	May 2012	#17
There is USSC precedent that is on point. "Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003)	24601	May 2012	#18
I was going to say that too	SoutherDem	May 2012	#20
Correct.	chollybocker	May 2012	#31
In GOP land, there is no "right" to anything legal if it makes some	beac	May 2012	#53
The same is soon to happen with gay marriage, as well.	joshcryer	May 2012	#61
He thinks gay guys will 'eye' him in the foxhole. What a doofus.	CurtEastPoint	May 2012	#22
I like how even in hatred, their ego is big enough to think they are irresistable to gay men	Blue_Tires	May 2012	#35
Or, perhaps, they're afraid that they AREN'T.	Ken Burch	May 2012	#41
Or anybody else for that matter.	smirkymonkey	May 2012	#69
I'm on the battlefield and have to concentrate on the enemy 600 yards away	AlbertCat	May 2012	#42
lol. i love how the same states and the same people pretend that the were pro-civil rights	La Lioness Priyanka	May 2012	#24
And a lot of times they just replaced communist/black/etc...	47of74	May 2012	#25
IMO these people are also trying to wedge african americans vs gays but they	La Lioness Priyanka	May 2012	#27
Maybe not PUBLIC sodomy	slackmaster	May 2012	#26
Stupidity is not a civil right, either.	Faygo Kid	May 2012	#28
What a gutless fucker.	tabasco	May 2012	#30
He can't have oral sex anymore?	Fearless	May 2012	#32
something I'm sure Mrs Marshall can attest to	azurnoir	May 2012	#33
wanna bet he sodomizes Mrs. Marshall?	provis99	May 2012	#43
well I'm sure that	azurnoir	May 2012	#47
But it's okay as long as they aren't gay for each other	cindyperry2010	May 2012	#55
Video:	Laughing Mirror	May 2012	#34
Actually, it is	bluestateguy	May 2012	#36
Time to start the pool on how long it'll be 'til this guy gets caught with a rent boy at Motel 6	Ken Burch	May 2012	#38
Look, I think Marshall is a tool, but I see a repetitive pattern in your posts that is off the mark.	swimboy	May 2012	#52
OK.	Ken Burch	May 2012	#54
Sodomy is not just a male-on-male thing. Does this freak think he can legislate	kestrel91316	May 2012	#39
I know. This stupid jerkoff doesn't know he's talking about oral sex	RainDog	May 2012	#65
a clumsy straight guy could easily commit a felony and not know it.	yurbud	May 2012	#68
A lot of married men (straight)	HockeyMom	May 2012	#44
But he LOVES girl-on-girl porn	1Greensix	May 2012	#45
To them, girl-on-girl sex is not homosexual.	mikeytherat	May 2012	#57
It seems pretty self evident to me...	Salviati	May 2012	#46
So, should we ban from the bench anyone who has ever given or received a blow-job?	Ian David	May 2012	#48
Fascism, bigotry, and oppression are not, but that doesn't stop you, Marshall. n/t	jtuck004	May 2012	#49
I know that old saw, but sex is sex...	Flubadubya	May 2012	#50
So judges are in the business of judging sexual acts of other judges.	undeterred	May 2012	#51
these people must lie awake at night thinking about that awful AWFUL gay sex..	frylock	May 2012	#56
Neither is playing World of Warcraft naked.	sofa king	May 2012	#60
Sounds like the pursuit of happiness to me...	PurityOfEssence	May 2012	#62
This is why we can't listen to those voices that tell us Dems = Repukes. It's already started here.	Tarheel_Dem	May 2012	#63
It's a constitutional right	RainDog	May 2012	#64
The way I do it, it should be. nt	Poll_Blind	May 2012	#67

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.