Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
13. I wonder why the jury didn't see it that way.
Fri May 11, 2012, 08:25 PM
May 2012

This, from your link, probably didn't help:

A few months after Alexander was released on bail on orders to have no contact with Gray, she got into an altercation with him at his home that gave him a black eye, Corey said. Alexander was charged with battery.

“Instead of her trying to work toward a resolution, about four months into this thing, claiming to be so afraid of this man, she went barging to his house and attacked him,” Corey said. “So it didn’t show much of her being remorseful of what happened and being a peaceful person.”
the 1 percent is trying to get us to go at each other leftyohiolib May 2012 #1
Something similar just happened in Collin County Texas cpamomfromtexas May 2012 #2
Someone correct me if Im wrong, but I do believe the "Prosecutors" for these two separate cases are Pachamama May 2012 #3
Someone please come and deliver us from this evil! Baitball Blogger May 2012 #5
...Seriously? Christ on a flaming pogo stick. (nt) Posteritatis May 2012 #10
The CNN introduction ("Saying he had ...for firing a waring shot) is inconsistent with the described AnotherMcIntosh May 2012 #4
What I don't understand is why anyone would get 20 years Chemisse May 2012 #6
CNN is not reliable. She went into the house with her gun and shot at her husband. AnotherMcIntosh May 2012 #9
Oh. That's different. slackmaster May 2012 #15
We have a 10 20, life law in FL, Kencorburn May 2012 #17
20 years for an abuse case makes no sense PatrynXX May 2012 #18
Because Florida has a law with a mandatory 20 year minimum specifically for this. AtheistCrusader May 2012 #22
Good to know info Texano78704 May 2012 #32
Very informative post, thanks! nt Cass May 2012 #36
She tried to leave through the garage. The garage door was not working. Cerridwen May 2012 #12
I wonder why the jury didn't see it that way. AnotherMcIntosh May 2012 #13
The family said she went to have him sign insurance papers. Cerridwen May 2012 #14
She got burned for being an honest person. AtheistCrusader May 2012 #26
Because the jury is instructed that a warning shot is prima facie evidence you are not in fear for y AtheistCrusader May 2012 #23
she went into the house to retrieve her property, apparently. n/.t tru May 2012 #21
Stand Your Ground (if you're white) FreeBC May 2012 #7
+100 baldguy May 2012 #29
You gotta be kidding me tawadi May 2012 #8
WTF! L0oniX May 2012 #11
Details are missing. Bladian May 2012 #16
"Details are missing" -- and you seem to be filling them in. pacalo May 2012 #19
He's still alive. AtheistCrusader May 2012 #24
Wow, that's the first I've heard that. pacalo May 2012 #28
20 years is insane, and the prosecutor way over-charged. SunSeeker May 2012 #20
The prosecutor has no choice. The Judge has no choice. The jury has no choice. AtheistCrusader May 2012 #25
The prosecutor always has discretion whether and for what to charge. SunSeeker May 2012 #34
There is nothing wrong with the prosecutor on this case. AtheistCrusader May 2012 #27
Well, she is a second-class citizen after all. valerief May 2012 #30
To the people reading this thread Lurks Often May 2012 #31
Past time! Jury nullification education should be given to every juror. lonestarnot May 2012 #33
sorry, wrong thread! Skittles May 2012 #35
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»(Marissa Alexander) Flori...»Reply #13