Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Now he tells us. KamaAina May 2012 #1
Bush was probably playing with his Game-Boy LiberalEsto May 2012 #2
I thought he decided while he was sitting on the throne.... Left Coast2020 May 2012 #41
Who made the decision that the President should not meet with the NSC? Jack Rabbit May 2012 #3
Unfortunately, imo, she was undermined at every point elleng May 2012 #7
That's what I think, too, but we need facts we can take to court. Jack Rabbit May 2012 #14
Not going to court; forget it. elleng May 2012 #15
I always thought Cheney was de facto president, and Georgie Buscho was just his lackey. crunch60 May 2012 #26
Then who decided to go into that war? Rove? JDPriestly May 2012 #4
Pretty sure that one big POINT of having Bush in the White House was to start war with Iraq FiveGoodMen May 2012 #6
The NeoCons were certainly committed on paper before 2000, when they got their Pearl Harbor HereSince1628 May 2012 #16
PNAC was running foreign policy. If you have any doubt read their manifesto. Citizen Worker May 2012 #12
That is what I wanted to say but couldn't remember what their name was. Thank you. jwirr May 2012 #18
+1 - Wolfowitz and Cheney TBF May 2012 #29
yeah, it was the PNAC plan newspeak May 2012 #39
The people who drafted PNAC are responsible lunatica May 2012 #33
Richard Clarke pretty much told us that years ago MiniMe May 2012 #5
“I get mad when bloggers accuse me of lying -- of knowing the information was false. I didn’t.” Kolesar May 2012 #8
It was his responsibility to know. surrealAmerican May 2012 #34
He calculated what would be best for the Republican Party Kolesar May 2012 #35
Dear Colon: Keep going, keep confessing to all the TOOL things you've participated in UTUSN May 2012 #9
Why would he? He was the "decider". Scuba May 2012 #10
So let's be clear... Javaman May 2012 #11
Colin Powell--who many times had an opportunity to lead--and failed to do so. MADem May 2012 #13
Did you read Bob Woodward's "State of Denial"? Sarcasticus May 2012 #24
Not yet--it's on my "long list" (as opposed to my short list, because I have mixed feelings about MADem May 2012 #40
Colon needs to just go away.... ingac70 May 2012 #17
There Were No Hero's DallasNE May 2012 #19
YEAH! I rememeber brave Colin speaking up during the run-up to war. tabasco May 2012 #20
WHIG Solly Mack May 2012 #21
Thanks for that Refresher...and it's important... KoKo May 2012 #22
Plundering the Treasury doesn't require debate. They wanted to do it and did it. nt valerief May 2012 #23
From before GWB was even sworn in. Sarcasticus May 2012 #30
Yep. All in the PNAC plans. nt valerief May 2012 #32
why ?? NSC guss May 2012 #25
“He had crossed the line in his own mind,..." unkachuck May 2012 #27
It was obvious that the Bush Admin was itching for a war and all they wanted was a fig leaf neverforget May 2012 #28
Ahem! Sarcasticus May 2012 #31
PuffHo WilliamPitt May 2012 #36
Give it up, Colon. BlueToTheBone May 2012 #37
It's said that confession is good for the soul ... GeorgeGist May 2012 #38
Depresses the hell out of me that none of these bastards are in prison. Left Coast2020 May 2012 #42
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Colin Powell: Bush Didn't...»Reply #1