Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

caseymoz

(5,763 posts)
27. I think the word you wanted was "duh."
Tue May 1, 2012, 02:38 AM
May 2012

No, I'm not saying nuclear scientists are EXACTLY the same, and "duh" would be the biggest word you know if you thought I meant that. Either that, or you're trolling. Given your use of caps, multiple periods, and triple questions marks, it could be either.

For the purposes of the narrow case of possibly having a memory stick switched. Yes, priests might be compared to Iranian Nuclear scientists, because both invited the ire of the world and sabotage.

For anything else? No. Are you going to press this issue now and make yourself look even dumber?

Also, gay porn, or pictures of naked adults, isn't child porn, so unlike priests we usually hear about, he's not accused of doing anything criminal. Or are you saying there's no difference between homosexuality and pedophilia? Are you saying he deserves contempt because he might be gay?

Understand, I'm an atheist heathen. Ex-Catholic. And if you look at my posting history, I'm one of the biggest opponents of the RCC on this board and on DU 2. In this case? I'd say innocent till proven guilty.

at first i thought the priest was in the porno lunasun Apr 2012 #1
Umm, I have a question jberryhill Apr 2012 #2
he claims to not have known about the porn and the cardinal said he believes him JI7 Apr 2012 #3
That's not what I understood jberryhill Apr 2012 #6
Presumably, these were not images chollybocker Apr 2012 #7
Okay, but jberryhill Apr 2012 #8
"Okay, but".... Who, exactly, are you defending here? chollybocker Apr 2012 #10
Who am I defending? jberryhill Apr 2012 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author chollybocker May 2012 #33
I only look at solo lesbian porn Tunkamerica Apr 2012 #11
LOL, wait, what? joshcryer Apr 2012 #14
Well you can't tell from pictures or videos, but there's always the chance that one or both of the Tunkamerica Apr 2012 #15
Yeah, I knew MF, it was the bisexual part that got me. joshcryer Apr 2012 #17
You never look at anything else? jberryhill Apr 2012 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author closeupready Apr 2012 #13
Good point. marble falls Apr 2012 #19
Hey, if he wants to look at naked men, more power to him... Drunken Irishman Apr 2012 #4
Destroyed it, huh? AtheistCrusader Apr 2012 #5
I actually think he might be innocent. caseymoz Apr 2012 #9
I wonder what his brother Timothy would say Tunkamerica Apr 2012 #12
Now that's almost a pun. caseymoz May 2012 #29
Almost as unfunny as speculating about a priest's porn collection? Tunkamerica May 2012 #31
The comeback is worse that the pun. caseymoz May 2012 #36
Yuh. chollybocker Apr 2012 #16
I think the word you wanted was "duh." caseymoz May 2012 #27
Or he was pulling one off an hour before in the confessional snooper2 Apr 2012 #24
I'm thinking that like me caseymoz May 2012 #30
His action in destroying the memory stick suggests otherwise. yellowcanine Apr 2012 #26
I don't know. Just seems difficult to me caseymoz May 2012 #28
Unless the "wrong file" was adjacent to his ppt and he clicked on it by accident. yellowcanine May 2012 #32
You've never seen the "squash the spider" caseymoz May 2012 #34
Anything is possible but I still think he is is a cassock on fire liar. yellowcanine May 2012 #37
and THIS religion LOVES telling women what to do / what not to do Skittles Apr 2012 #18
Gay porn vs pictures of naked men marshall Apr 2012 #22
gay porn ccavagnolo Apr 2012 #23
More here: hedgehog Apr 2012 #25
Yet if the priest goes to the health club and takes a shower, there's no issue. Psephos May 2012 #35
'sabbatical leave'? tawadi May 2012 #38
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Priest in gay porn probe ...»Reply #27