Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(881 posts)

17. We already do

Sun Jul 22, 2012, 12:06 AM

Jul 2012

but since this wasn't an assault weapon (it's not select fire) that's not an issue that presents itself.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Getting through to gun owners Historyprof77132 Jul 2012 #1

Welcome to DU, Prof MrScorpio Jul 2012 #2

Sounds to me you have forgotten recent history GarroHorus Jul 2012 #5

Welcome to DU nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #15

Welcome to the club primavera Jul 2012 #20

most of these people arm themselves to the teeth Historyprof77132 Jul 2012 #21

Todays NRA wouldn't want any reasonable laws... Archae Jul 2012 #3

Bingo! MrScorpio Jul 2012 #4

Interesting but... Reasonable_Argument Jul 2012 #8

He should not have been denied a firearm GarroHorus Jul 2012 #9

I'm in full agreement Reasonable_Argument Jul 2012 #10

Sick. Even when the reality of so many death hits you in the face. morningfog Jul 2012 #11

It's not sick to support Constitutional rights SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #12

We should be able to regulate so that assault weapons morningfog Jul 2012 #13

Define assault weapon n/t SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #16

We already do Reasonable_Argument Jul 2012 #17

You guys really don't see the inconsistency here, do you? primavera Jul 2012 #22

+1000 smirkymonkey Jul 2012 #23

Sadly yes Reasonable_Argument Jul 2012 #14

Happens all the time. moondust Jul 2012 #18