Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LiberalFighter

(50,856 posts)
33. Here is a good response from CTJ Citizens for Tax Justice
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 01:48 PM
Jul 2012
It’s unclear how Ms. Ford comes up with a 36 percent rate, but clearly one thing she’s doing is counting Corning’s “deferred” U.S. taxes (taxes not yet paid) as well as “current” taxes (U.S. taxes actually paid in 2011). Of course, those “deferred” taxes may eventually be paid. If and when they are paid, they will be included in Corning’s “current” taxes in the year(s) they are paid.

But current taxes are what Corning actually pays each year, and Corning has amassed an impressive record of paying nothing, or less than nothing, in current U.S. taxes. CTJ and ITEP’s November 2011 corporate tax avoidance report found that between 2008 and 2010, Corning didn’t pay a dime in federal corporate income taxes, actually receiving a $4 million refund to add to its $1.9 billion in U.S. profits during this period. And a more recent CTJ report found that in 2011, Corning earned almost $1 billion in U.S. pretax income, and once again didn’t pay a dime in federal income tax. These data paint a dramatically different picture from the “36 percent” claim made by Corning before Congress today.

In fact, over the 2008-2010 period, Corning paid a higher effective corporate income tax rate to foreign governments than it paid to the US government. (Which wasn’t hard to do, since it paid nothing to the U.S. government.) CTJ’s November 2011 report shows that over the 2008-2010 period, Corning paid -0.2 percent (negative 0.2 percent) of its US profits in US corporate income taxes, but paid 8.6 percent (positive 8.6 percent) of its foreign profits in foreign corporate income taxes.

[link:http://www.ctj.org/taxjusticedigest/archive/2012/07/corning_pays_zero_federal_taxe.php|
Full Response]
I can't wrap my head around this... Kalidurga Jul 2012 #1
Only if you live in the world of normal. BlueToTheBone Jul 2012 #7
AND receiving a refund??? zbdent Jul 2012 #20
Getting a refund when no taxes were paid = Corporate Welfare nt Doremus Jul 2012 #39
+1000 BillyJack Jul 2012 #42
Totally Agree! nt avebury Jul 2012 #55
corps that show a loss TheFarseer Jul 2012 #44
Getting a $4 mil refund is not enough. CrispyQ Jul 2012 #26
HAHA-dont be naive ErikJ Jul 2012 #41
kr. more lies from shameless lying liars HiPointDem Jul 2012 #2
Isnt that called perjury? nt cstanleytech Jul 2012 #3
It sure sounds like it to me. surrealAmerican Jul 2012 #8
No, its called 'accounting.' elleng Jul 2012 #28
well that takes some nerve. nt limpyhobbler Jul 2012 #4
She was of course challenged by the entire Congressional committee aint_no_life_nowhere Jul 2012 #5
Well, they nodded their heads sagely and harrumphed. bluedigger Jul 2012 #23
Ford and others like her will continue to complain LuvNewcastle Jul 2012 #6
They won't even stop complaining then. Zalatix Jul 2012 #15
The teabaggers demand it!! Fantastic Anarchist Jul 2012 #29
+1 freshwest Jul 2012 #38
That's what internships are. I still get offered them after 20 years in my field. slampoet Jul 2012 #52
... AzDar Jul 2012 #9
These people are the real villains of America. And Congress are their agents. nt valerief Jul 2012 #10
Agents? Canuckistanian Jul 2012 #11
Congress writes the laws to make the crimes against humanity legal/possible. They're agents who get valerief Jul 2012 #13
Yep, as are all the investors. raouldukelives Jul 2012 #17
Thank you. nt woo me with science Jul 2012 #53
Where is Wikileaks when we need them marias23 Jul 2012 #12
More logic from Mitt-Romney's 1% world: beac Jul 2012 #14
DU Rec woo me with science Jul 2012 #16
It's the same as people bitching that Obama raised their taxes when they were reduced. bulloney Jul 2012 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author LiberalFighter Jul 2012 #19
K&R BumRushDaShow Jul 2012 #21
A bit difficult to have an effective tax rate of 36 percent when they don't pay any taxes. LiberalFighter Jul 2012 #22
Wow. Couple that with lower effective tax rates as the incomes go up... SunSeeker Jul 2012 #24
I just posted a snark on the Corning, Inc Facebook Page - join me! n/t radhika Jul 2012 #25
Bloodsuckers. CrispyQ Jul 2012 #27
She's whining because Corning didn't get a larger negative tax rate (refund). Snarkoleptic Jul 2012 #30
The absolute worst kind of grifter. Initech Jul 2012 #31
And she probably said it with a perfectly straight face. aquamarina Jul 2012 #32
I stopped listening to their shit long ago. Why would anyone want to waste their time listening to lonestarnot Jul 2012 #45
Here is a good response from CTJ Citizens for Tax Justice LiberalFighter Jul 2012 #33
K & R Scurrilous Jul 2012 #34
It's certainly not reflected in the stock price. mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2012 #35
A bunch of empty suits in Congress, blkmusclmachine Jul 2012 #36
That's Change You Can Believe In!!! blkmusclmachine Jul 2012 #37
Pardon the pun, but that's rich. Kennah Jul 2012 #40
Corporations need to be given the tab for the chaos created by their greed and ungrateful free ride midnight Jul 2012 #43
These crybabies are total Hypocrites/Liars Iggy Jul 2012 #46
Uber Wealthy Hiding at Least $21 Trillion worldwide Iggy Jul 2012 #47
Kick woo me with science Jul 2012 #48
Go figure. avaistheone1 Jul 2012 #49
K&R valerief Jul 2012 #50
Makes sense. They paid too much in comparison to what they have to pay in the Caymans....ZERO. piperpibroch Jul 2012 #51
Taxes to high rks306 Jul 2012 #54
We need to drug test those fucking corporations on welfare! Hubert Flottz Jul 2012 #56
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Corporation That Paid Not...»Reply #33