Reply #47

In the discussion thread: I'm proposing an idea that should satisfy both gun nuts AND liberals/progressives... [View all]

Response to FarLeftFist (Original post)

Sat Jul 21, 2012, 11:52 AM

NCTraveler (1,841 posts)

47. John Kerry doesn't agree.

Is he not liberal/progressive?

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

47 replies	Author	Time	Post
I'm proposing an idea that should satisfy both gun nuts AND liberals/progressives... [View all]	FarLeftFist	Jul 2012	OP
K and R	Kingofalldems	Jul 2012	#1
This message was self-deleted by its author	GarroHorus	Jul 2012	#2
Well, that's what the Founders intended. Were they lunatics?	nichomachus	Jul 2012	#10
This message was self-deleted by its author	GarroHorus	Jul 2012	#12
That is not logic	Progressive dog	Jul 2012	#26
This message was self-deleted by its author	GarroHorus	Jul 2012	#28
Ok, 22 RIFLES	HockeyMom	Jul 2012	#3
Actually it doesn't satisfy either	ProgressiveProfessor	Jul 2012	#4
That would be a good start. A better one would be to interpret the 2nd amend	apocalypsehow	Jul 2012	#5
Many liberals are gun owners	obamanut2012	Jul 2012	#6
And most gun nuts are conservatives	SecularMotion	Jul 2012	#22
I think some would consider all gun owners "gun nuts"	obamanut2012	Jul 2012	#37
That's the danger of being a prohibitionist.	JoeyT	Jul 2012	#42
So you collect all normal guns first? n-t	Logical	Jul 2012	#7
Single shot 20ga shotguns.	ileus	Jul 2012	#8
Well, the powder goes in first, I'm afraid, then gets tamped down	Warpy	Jul 2012	#9
The time it takes to load a muzzle loader is the cooling down period	auburngrad82	Jul 2012	#15
In Massachusetts, you don't need a permit for those. n/t	Ian David	Jul 2012	#11
A strict constructionist would agree with you ... or argue ...	JoePhilly	Jul 2012	#13
That's the way I understand it too	dreamnightwind	Jul 2012	#34
K&R!	yellerpup	Jul 2012	#14
Muzzle-loaders are far from idiot-proof	Mopar151	Jul 2012	#16
Oh come on, think of the suffering and pain, for heaven's sake.	TheCowsCameHome	Jul 2012	#17
And the 1st Amendment will not apply to electronic media? nt	hack89	Jul 2012	#18
+1000 nt	Mojorabbit	Jul 2012	#20
+10,000	Johnny Rico	Jul 2012	#24
I recommend th Long Rifle	flamingdem	Jul 2012	#19
my husband who is a gun owner is a firm believer in laws that restrict.... i am not sure	seabeyond	Jul 2012	#21
i have a more workable idea.	unblock	Jul 2012	#23
That won't stop a pyschopath, they want prison	flamingdem	Jul 2012	#25
my solution isn't nearly as effective, true; but it has a far better shot at becoming reality.	unblock	Jul 2012	#27
Chris Rock Had The Best Answer: Charge $5000 per bullet	Yavin4	Jul 2012	#29
I'm against such an absurd proposal, of course, but it would have one upside:	Johnny Rico	Jul 2012	#30
Yes - This	Ruby the Liberal	Jul 2012	#31
This message was self-deleted by its author	felix_numinous	Jul 2012	#32
Gun control seems to work pretty well in the rest of the world.	DanTex	Jul 2012	#33
This message was self-deleted by its author	felix_numinous	Jul 2012	#38
Guns and drugs are completely different.	DanTex	Jul 2012	#44
This message was self-deleted by its author	felix_numinous	Jul 2012	#40
"Maybe people will think I am living in a dream world"	sibelian	Jul 2012	#36
And if you want something more modern	dreamnightwind	Jul 2012	#35
And no speech more advanced than the hand operated printing press!	4th law of robotics	Jul 2012	#39
the Girandoni Air Rifle existed about 10 years before the 2nd Amendment was written.	belcffub	Jul 2012	#41
Won't work.	HooptieWagon	Jul 2012	#43
Those are sometimes called "antique firearms."	sofa king	Jul 2012	#45
How about working on a non lethal	Shankapotomus	Jul 2012	#46
John Kerry doesn't agree.	NCTraveler	Jul 2012	#47

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.