Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SugarShack

(1,635 posts)
53. good point, they're trying to protect him from the beginning, when he ignored law enforcement
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 10:04 PM
Jul 2012

and they will continue until they get him off. I wonder what he knows about other abuses?

He is an ugly representation OverseaVisitor Jul 2012 #1
I don't understand how this is connected to the trial for the murder of Trayvon Martin. enough Jul 2012 #2
I don't think the allegations have anything to do with the murder charge. TalkingDog Jul 2012 #3
Much of the prosecution's case seems to be based on impugning Zimmerman's character slackmaster Jul 2012 #17
Well it certainly points to a personality that will abuse others....and children??? You for real? SugarShack Jul 2012 #52
Sociopath, mzmolly Jul 2012 #4
Geez really? pipoman Jul 2012 #5
The witness contacted authorities to tell them Zimmerman was racist csziggy Jul 2012 #7
But when asked about it, she didn't provide any examples of how Zimmerman supposedly was LisaL Jul 2012 #10
She gave an example of how the entire Zimmerman family was racist csziggy Jul 2012 #28
What example? Do tell. LisaL Jul 2012 #35
It's in the article linked in the OP csziggy Jul 2012 #49
One of the first things a criminal investigator pipoman Jul 2012 #12
You could be right - I was just bringing up her original motivation csziggy Jul 2012 #27
...until he was 18. mzmolly Jul 2012 #11
This, assuming it is true, wouldn't prove any of those things... pipoman Jul 2012 #13
Yes it mzmolly Jul 2012 #14
OK, I read it.. pipoman Jul 2012 #15
I also doubt that it is admissible. mzmolly Jul 2012 #16
I am not defending him or what he did or didn't do.. pipoman Jul 2012 #19
Regarding the microscope you speak of ... mzmolly Jul 2012 #20
You nor I know, pipoman Jul 2012 #22
"Think about the police interviewing every person you have ever known and asking them questions..." mzmolly Jul 2012 #29
No, first a prosecutor will determine the significance.. pipoman Jul 2012 #32
The prosecution released the information mzmolly Jul 2012 #36
You are not understanding anything I am saying correctly.. pipoman Jul 2012 #38
If you're going to discuss a case, with such zest, mzmolly Jul 2012 #41
I have never once said, pipoman Jul 2012 #43
You know nothing about me mzmolly Jul 2012 #47
"When someone is in their 30's, nothing that they did while a juvenile really says anything ... mzmolly Jul 2012 #21
Now he has a Psychiatric Disorder? pipoman Jul 2012 #33
Let me refer you back to your dismissive statement. mzmolly Jul 2012 #37
This is contrary...completely with antisocial behavior.. pipoman Jul 2012 #39
No, it isn't contrary. mzmolly Jul 2012 #40
I didn't say anti-social can't act...they are great actors pipoman Jul 2012 #45
So you think the witness had warm feelings mzmolly Jul 2012 #46
Go back and read what was written..nobody would read that pipoman Jul 2012 #56
What mzmolly Jul 2012 #58
You didn't go back and read pipoman Jul 2012 #60
I read the quote mzmolly Jul 2012 #61
I've seen people here bend themselves into knots defend this racist thug, Occulus Jul 2012 #25
We all develop our beliefs from our life's experience.. pipoman Jul 2012 #26
As a criminal investigator mzmolly Jul 2012 #30
It depends if I am trying to pipoman Jul 2012 #31
Regardless, mzmolly Jul 2012 #34
Are you meaning only "legally" that nothing a person did as a juvi says anything about them... uppityperson Jul 2012 #54
No, in court.. pipoman Jul 2012 #55
Thank you. Seems many DUers are meaning in real life which is different as in real life of course uppityperson Jul 2012 #57
I completely agree pipoman Jul 2012 #59
Though, if you are having fun snarking back and forth up there, have at it. uppityperson Jul 2012 #62
Sometimes I do enjoy it.. pipoman Jul 2012 #63
For the record, mzmolly Jul 2012 #64
For the record, I am capable of reading all the replies in this thread but thank you for trying to uppityperson Jul 2012 #65
Sure. mzmolly Jul 2012 #66
Oh, I read them all. Just came to a different conclusion after clarifying a few things. uppityperson Jul 2012 #67
I said above that I didn't feel the accusations were admissible in a court of law. mzmolly Jul 2012 #68
Which is why I asked and clarified. I was ready to jump his shit, but clarified and understand uppityperson Jul 2012 #69
Ahh. mzmolly Jul 2012 #70
B mzmolly Jul 2012 #48
Is this even admissible at trial? longship Jul 2012 #6
No, I don't think it's admissible at trial. LisaL Jul 2012 #8
I don't think it will even come up in a trial. I only posted it because it may speak TalkingDog Jul 2012 #9
Probably not, but the defense will have to explicitly move for it to be ruled as inadmissable slackmaster Jul 2012 #18
Both Lisabeth Salander and Nils Bjurman would object to the tattoo argument. longship Jul 2012 #23
Trying to taint the jury pool, perhaps? (n/t) Seeking Serenity Jul 2012 #24
Gathering evidence and releasing it mzmolly Jul 2012 #42
good point, they're trying to protect him from the beginning, when he ignored law enforcement SugarShack Jul 2012 #53
Looks kind of like a smear campaign ... OneTenthofOnePercent Jul 2012 #44
Connections? mzmolly Jul 2012 #50
More proof needed, however... liberalmuse Jul 2012 #51
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Interesting development (...»Reply #53