Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Interesting development (or maybe not): Zimmerman implicated in molestation of younger relative [View all]mzmolly
(50,984 posts)41. If you're going to discuss a case, with such zest,
familiarize yourself the the basics, please. Re: the wiki quote/link I noted, you failed to read the part that pertained to criminal cases, and pre-trial prep. Florida is one of the few of states, that permits depositions in criminal cases. I know of at least one witness who was deposed in this case.
A Florida attorney breaks it down in simple terms: http://www.ericmathenylaw.com/Criminal-Defense-Blog/2010/July/Depositions.aspx
Florida is one of just a handful of states that permits depositions in criminal cases. Most states only permit the taking of depositions in civil cases.
We are lucky that our state permits criminal defense attorneys (and prosecutors) to take sworn testimony from witnesses, both civilian and officer, in all felony cases. Traditionally, depositions are not allowed in misdemeanor cases unless good cause is shown by the party wishing to take the deposition.
A deposition is an opportunity for an attorney to ask questions of a witness while the witness is under oath. Depositions are recorded by court reporters and then transcribed so that the attorneys may later cross-examine these witnesses based on the testimony they gave during their deposition.
We are lucky that our state permits criminal defense attorneys (and prosecutors) to take sworn testimony from witnesses, both civilian and officer, in all felony cases. Traditionally, depositions are not allowed in misdemeanor cases unless good cause is shown by the party wishing to take the deposition.
A deposition is an opportunity for an attorney to ask questions of a witness while the witness is under oath. Depositions are recorded by court reporters and then transcribed so that the attorneys may later cross-examine these witnesses based on the testimony they gave during their deposition.
Regardless, the investigative interviews are compelling enough. Your assertion that the prosecution doesn't have the evidence to convict Zimmerman is based upon nothing more than your love of guns. Pull yourself away from Guns and Ammo for a minute and contrast Zimmerman's statements on the record, to the 911 calls. That will give you a good start on filling that empty box of yours.
I've studied this case quite closely. You suggesting that I need to peel myself away from CSI, is laughable given your apparent lack of knowledge. I've never watched an episode of CSI, but I have read over 300 pages of evidence released in the Zimmerman case. Enough to fill a box, I'd say.
Previously, you suggested "everyone who knows the guy and those who interviewed him say he isn't a racist."
You were wrong.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002938019#post5
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Interesting development (or maybe not): Zimmerman implicated in molestation of younger relative [View all]
TalkingDog
Jul 2012
OP
I don't understand how this is connected to the trial for the murder of Trayvon Martin.
enough
Jul 2012
#2
Much of the prosecution's case seems to be based on impugning Zimmerman's character
slackmaster
Jul 2012
#17
Well it certainly points to a personality that will abuse others....and children??? You for real?
SugarShack
Jul 2012
#52
But when asked about it, she didn't provide any examples of how Zimmerman supposedly was
LisaL
Jul 2012
#10
"Think about the police interviewing every person you have ever known and asking them questions..."
mzmolly
Jul 2012
#29
"When someone is in their 30's, nothing that they did while a juvenile really says anything ...
mzmolly
Jul 2012
#21
Are you meaning only "legally" that nothing a person did as a juvi says anything about them...
uppityperson
Jul 2012
#54
Thank you. Seems many DUers are meaning in real life which is different as in real life of course
uppityperson
Jul 2012
#57
Though, if you are having fun snarking back and forth up there, have at it.
uppityperson
Jul 2012
#62
For the record, I am capable of reading all the replies in this thread but thank you for trying to
uppityperson
Jul 2012
#65
Oh, I read them all. Just came to a different conclusion after clarifying a few things.
uppityperson
Jul 2012
#67
I said above that I didn't feel the accusations were admissible in a court of law.
mzmolly
Jul 2012
#68
Which is why I asked and clarified. I was ready to jump his shit, but clarified and understand
uppityperson
Jul 2012
#69
I don't think it will even come up in a trial. I only posted it because it may speak
TalkingDog
Jul 2012
#9
Probably not, but the defense will have to explicitly move for it to be ruled as inadmissable
slackmaster
Jul 2012
#18
good point, they're trying to protect him from the beginning, when he ignored law enforcement
SugarShack
Jul 2012
#53