Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

girl gone mad

(20,634 posts)
81. You're making some really uninformed comments in this thread.
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 02:49 PM
Jul 2012

Maybe you should read up on the decision before posting.

DOUCHEWALD!!!!! GarroHorus Jul 2012 #1
how about not-a-democrat-apologetic-drone TownDrunk2 Jul 2012 #10
How about an anti-Obama ASSHOLE who does nothing but anti-Obama screeds like Limbaugh? GarroHorus Jul 2012 #12
Greenwald is on the President's side regarding Medicaid expansion. Elena Kagan is not. smokey nj Jul 2012 #13
You didn't even read the article, or else you would not have revealed your pavlovian vitriol stockholmer Jul 2012 #20
"pavlovian vitriol" = short, to the point, and exactly right AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2012 #54
I think you're lost. Greenwald was defending the President's HC policy sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #100
how about you read an article before knee-jerking? stockholmer Jul 2012 #15
I was replying to the posting of "DOUCHEWALD" in reference to Glenn Greenwald NOT to the article TownDrunk2 Jul 2012 #19
so was I. Just because a person is a leftist-progressive and a fierce champion of civil stockholmer Jul 2012 #23
You oppose the President's expansion of Medicaid also then? sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #101
I support the intent, but the bill, I fear is going to backfire on certain parts and be used as an stockholmer Jul 2012 #104
Oops, my apologies, my comment was intended for sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #105
Translation: "I resorted to an ad-hominem attack..." Marzupialis Jul 2012 #86
try reading the article first before droning on with your talking point (I'm being generous with the stockholmer Jul 2012 #17
Well, that's persuasive. /nt yardwork Jul 2012 #21
that'll be another 50 cents usage fee. dionysus Jul 2012 #48
. GarroHorus Jul 2012 #52
I'ma place a glass jar over on the counter. every time you say douchewald i want 50 cents in there. dionysus Jul 2012 #55
Is there a jar shortage or something? DevonRex Jul 2012 #56
and where have we been, hmm? dionysus Jul 2012 #84
I keep getting sent to the penalty box DevonRex Jul 2012 #85
oh yeah, he got that from you, didn't he? inna Jul 2012 #91
i almost got enough to buy a six pack from this thread alone. dionysus Jul 2012 #92
Post removed Post removed Jul 2012 #62
SO you disagree with Greenwald that the Medicaid expansion should NOT have been struck down? MNBrewer Jul 2012 #63
I take it you oppose the Medicaid expansion and agree with the five Right Wing sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #99
Kagan's decision to side with the Wingers did great harm to the goal of insuring more people Bluenorthwest Jul 2012 #2
How? They upheld the law and have no power to change it. vaberella Jul 2012 #4
Huh? They changed the law by accepting parts and voting down parts. The part discussed by the OP rhett o rick Jul 2012 #8
+1 nashville_brook Jul 2012 #68
They didn't strike it down. They had a dissenting opinion. vaberella Jul 2012 #3
The court struck down the penalty on the states that do not implement the Medicaid expansion. Mass Jul 2012 #5
That's not true. If they refuse they lose the additional funding ACA would provide. Sirveri Jul 2012 #96
The medicaid expansion was made optional without penalty. This time Greewald rateyes Jul 2012 #16
There was more than one law contained in this ruling. The justices struck down the Medicaid rule. yardwork Jul 2012 #22
You're making some really uninformed comments in this thread. girl gone mad Jul 2012 #81
I've been waiting to see if Greenwald would comment on the ACA ruling... SidDithers Jul 2012 #6
So you approve of Justice Kagen's vote? nm rhett o rick Jul 2012 #7
He's going after Kagan the way teabaggers go after Roberts GarroHorus Jul 2012 #9
So was Sotomayor Oilwellian Jul 2012 #11
The point of his column is that Kagan sided with the right wing justices to remove Medicaid yardwork Jul 2012 #25
another heaven05 Jul 2012 #49
Greenwald's own words shows he referred to both Kagan's and Breyer's votes on the Medicaid issue. AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2012 #40
We get it, you want Greenwald to be a cheerleader, not a critic. Vattel Jul 2012 #44
Are you saying Americans should not have access to information that is of the utmost sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #103
How would Greenwald feel if one of the liberal justices spouse received money for supporting ACA kemah Jul 2012 #14
Obama appointed Kagan because she was a reliable corporate stooge brentspeak Jul 2012 #18
big thumbs up stockholmer Jul 2012 #24
You got that right. Kagan is another Democratic Whizzer White byeya Jul 2012 #27
You know ProSense Jul 2012 #28
She did not vote to uphold it. That is the point. former9thward Jul 2012 #79
No ProSense Jul 2012 #90
Only two Justices voted to uphold the entire law. former9thward Jul 2012 #93
So ProSense Jul 2012 #94
You use the term "final decision" as if that overruled everything else. former9thward Jul 2012 #97
Exactly. Thanks. AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2012 #35
thanks for posting this -- good reminder! nashville_brook Jul 2012 #70
Th claim that Miers was more qualified than Kagan may be the stupidest thing I've ever seen here. bornskeptic Jul 2012 #80
The truth hurts, but until you acknowledge it, you cannot fix it. woo me with science Jul 2012 #102
Du rec. Nt xchrom Jul 2012 #26
Meh, justices are supposed to rule on constitutionality SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #29
No... SidDithers Jul 2012 #30
And to some, they're to be dismissed out of hand with a shout of "DOUCEHWALD". Marr Jul 2012 #33
I dismiss anything Douchewald writes out of hand GarroHorus Jul 2012 #34
Yes, I know-- you make a wonderful argument. Marr Jul 2012 #37
And I won't read the piece. Douchewald is no different from Limbaugh. He is an enemy. n/t GarroHorus Jul 2012 #39
Which makes your posts, on whatever Greenwald is writing about, completely without merit. Demit Jul 2012 #60
I'm sick of making arguments about Douchewald, Uygur, Hamsher, and other idiots on the left. GarroHorus Jul 2012 #72
lol, incredibly ignorant series of posts there, Garro inna Jul 2012 #87
Which is why your own sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #106
Absolutely. AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2012 #50
+1 treestar Jul 2012 #38
I agree!!!!! Vattel Jul 2012 #46
And yet it's constitutional to offer people a choice that isn't really a choice at all? girl gone mad Jul 2012 #82
The ruling in question, Medicaid expansion, had nothing to do with corporations SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #88
Your condescension is misplaced and reflects poorly on you - just so you know, nt inna Jul 2012 #98
I find this ProSense Jul 2012 #31
Did you know that the "right-wing" ACLU has the same position as Greenwald? AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2012 #32
Yes, and ProSense Jul 2012 #36
If you need an explanation, it is commonly understood that the ACLU is about as far left as any AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2012 #47
So ProSense Jul 2012 #53
No. Try to be logical. My words speak for themselves. They mean exactly what they say. AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2012 #57
Nice ProSense Jul 2012 #73
K&R. So sad Kagan felt it was "too punitive" to prioritize healthcare for the destitute. Overseas Jul 2012 #41
"UPDATE: Elizabeth Warren, asked about the Medicaid ruling last week... ProSense Jul 2012 #42
KNR DirkGently Jul 2012 #43
Blast from the past: Kagan on Scalia: ""He's made a huntress out of me!" Poll_Blind Jul 2012 #45
Do you ProSense Jul 2012 #51
I don't know it kind of seems kind of disingenuous SunsetDreams Jul 2012 #58
Greenwald's own words referred to both: AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2012 #59
He only acknowledged the vote SunsetDreams Jul 2012 #61
His words refer to both. AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2012 #64
Not at all SunsetDreams Jul 2012 #65
If you are unhappy with the Greenwald's headline, and if you truly want to know why AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2012 #69
Maybe you ProSense Jul 2012 #75
Did you read the words from your own posting? Did you understand them? AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2012 #76
Did you ProSense Jul 2012 #78
Ok SunsetDreams Jul 2012 #77
I think his point was that Kagan was a blank slate when she came in, & now we are seeing how Demit Jul 2012 #66
IF he does write about Breyer SunsetDreams Jul 2012 #67
It's not odd at all when Breyer has not equally supported the right-wing faction in the way that AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2012 #71
What utter nonsense. n/t ProSense Jul 2012 #74
Don't you mean utter drivel? girl gone mad Jul 2012 #83
I must be a bad person... bvar22 Jul 2012 #89
That's a two-fer shock. Chan790 Jul 2012 #95
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Greenwald slams Elena Kag...»Reply #81