Reply #10

In the discussion thread: The Stealing of the 2000 Presidential Election: Ch 1, Part 2 – The 36-Day Battle to Recount the Vote [View all]

Response to Time for change (Original post)

Sun Jun 24, 2012, 01:08 PM

cbrer (1,831 posts)

10. Scathing Indictment

Between you and Bugliosi, there is little doubt about the facts behind the theft.

I'm not sure which atrocity bothers me more.

GW Bush's body count? Or crushing of International law?

SCOTUS composition and rulings, which continue to this sad day.

The American public's willingness to accept this outrageous abortion of justice.

Thanks for the article, as well as the research and publishing. Even if it made me reach for my blood pressure medicine.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

46 replies	Author	Time	Post
The Stealing of the 2000 Presidential Election: Ch 1, Part 2 – The 36-Day Battle to Recount the Vote [View all]	Time for change	Jun 2012	OP
I am enjoying your reports. Some notes for you.	Festivito	Jun 2012	#1
Thank you.	Time for change	Jun 2012	#6
jsut started to read, but I remember going to sleep with Gore as pres, then waking up the next	robinlynne	Jun 2012	#2
Yes, they did call it for Gore first, and then they called it for Bush, and then they called it	Time for change	Jun 2012	#7
When Obama won, I was afraid to go to sleep. They switch presidents while you sleep.	robinlynne	Jun 2012	#27
The Republicans made a great discovery during the 2000 election ...	kentuck	Jun 2012	#3
It appears the Democratic Party isnt the lest bit concerned with	rhett o rick	Jun 2012	#4
the Party actively defends Registrars who dabble with Diebold, and I do mean literally.	robinlynne	Jun 2012	#28
Indeed they are trying to do it again	Time for change	Jun 2012	#9
And the Repubs know they cannot win without Florida...	kentuck	Jun 2012	#12
About that Brooks Brothers Riot	mattclearing	Jun 2012	#5
Maybe the picture should be included in the book	Time for change	Jun 2012	#11
Yeah, the Wapo archive seems to have lost its artwork.	mattclearing	Jun 2012	#14
Now that was a long national nightmare!	magnifisense	Jun 2012	#8
Yes, the influence of money in politics and the restrictive voting laws are a terrible thing	Time for change	Jun 2012	#17
How do we wake people up?	magnifisense	Jun 2012	#43
Scathing Indictment	cbrer	Jun 2012	#10
Can't wait for the whole book.	pa28	Jun 2012	#13
Thanks -- I will be covering the 2004 exit poll discrepancies from the official vote count	Time for change	Jun 2012	#36
Thanks for the detailed answer. I wanted to kick and add a couple of links.	pa28	Jun 2012	#39
Vanity Fair's article has a description of what went on before the SCOTUS made their decision.	Gregorian	Jun 2012	#15
big k and r	nashville_brook	Jun 2012	#16
Sent you a DU mail. Even the first recount was never completed.	Tennessee Gal	Jun 2012	#18
It sounds like you're talking about the automatic machine recount, right?	Time for change	Jun 2012	#22
Yes, the machine recount. 16 counties did not complete that.	Tennessee Gal	Jun 2012	#23
In your piece posted you say this:	Tennessee Gal	Jun 2012	#24
Yes, I will change that. Thank you for pointing it out.	Time for change	Jun 2012	#25
'Recount' Means to Count Again, Florida Official Ruled in '99	Tennessee Gal	Jun 2012	#19
Here is a picture from the Day America Died:	annabanana	Jun 2012	#20
I'm looking forward to reading your book.	Uncle Joe	Jun 2012	#21
There was one day that stands out in my memory when...	kentuck	Jun 2012	#26
I'm pretty sure you're referring to the 680 technically illegal overseas ballots	Time for change	Jun 2012	#29
K&R	inna	Jun 2012	#30
Have you interviewed Dexter Douglass and Ion Sancho?	csziggy	Jun 2012	#31
Thank you	Time for change	Jun 2012	#32
If I can help you contact them, PM me	csziggy	Jun 2012	#33
Thank you	Time for change	Jun 2012	#37
That might work with Ion Sancho	csziggy	Jun 2012	#38
Nice work! nt	Zorra	Jun 2012	#34
K & R	KBlagburn	Jun 2012	#35
One important issue that you need to address	MadHound	Jun 2012	#40
I will address that issue in my next OP	Time for change	Jun 2012	#41
K&R. The federal supreme court overruled the state supreme court.	Overseas	Jun 2012	#42
You got it	Time for change	Jun 2012	#44
A nifty little chart...	joycejnr	Jul 2012	#45
Several nifty charts -- and links	Time for change	Jul 2012	#46

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.