Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CakeGrrl

(10,611 posts)
54. ...
Thu Dec 29, 2011, 12:30 PM
Dec 2011



Of course, it wouldn't floor me with shock if the Clinton Machine was idling, but truthfully I think it's GOP psy-ops at work.

And how well they know the susceptibility of their mark.
Hillary would have had the same Congress and same issues to deal with treestar Dec 2011 #1
Would Hillary jail the Banksters FreakinDJ Dec 2011 #3
Beneficiaries of a corrupt monetary system would be hard-pressed to levy justice upon it... Larry Ogg Dec 2011 #41
LOL Mr Dixon Dec 2011 #18
"And things would have turned out pretty much the same. " Charlemagne Dec 2011 #73
Right! treestar Dec 2011 #77
Why don't we Talk about an Al Gore America? orpupilofnature57 Dec 2011 #2
Or Nader, or Kucinich Major Nikon Dec 2011 #39
I fully support President Obama liberal N proud Dec 2011 #4
He is our only option Charlemagne Dec 2011 #72
No propaganda here will make me think Obama has done a good job Vattel Dec 2011 #103
I fully support the President liberal N proud Dec 2011 #106
That is a ridiculous claim. ("no propaganda claiming Obama has done a good job") Vattel Dec 2011 #109
I voted for Hillary during the primary NNN0LHI Dec 2011 #5
I voted for Hillary and contributed mightily to her campaign. bluestate10 Dec 2011 #101
As somebody who supported Obama, mythology Dec 2011 #108
Keep dreaming...nt SidDithers Dec 2011 #6
If you think they hate the "Kenyan Muslim" TexasProgresive Dec 2011 #7
Why are you trying to stir up crap? Botany Dec 2011 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author SoDesuKa Dec 2011 #40
Do not put bull shit on toast and tell me to "eat up it is just country style apple butter" Botany Dec 2011 #52
It was GOP money that paid for those robocalls--make no mistake. MADem Dec 2011 #58
Lame and totally unworkable. Cooley Hurd Dec 2011 #9
PUMA crap. Odin2005 Dec 2011 #10
If you're suggesting that the people who were ardent supporters of Hillary in 08 would back this MADem Dec 2011 #59
+1. nt sufrommich Dec 2011 #62
I was a big 08 Hillary backer. I prefer President Obama now. No contest. nt bluestate10 Dec 2011 #102
HRC.. sendero Dec 2011 #11
I have two words for you: Ronald Reagan. moriah Dec 2011 #12
+1000 JCMach1 Dec 2011 #14
you have cause and effect mixed up, if you are implying the challenge led to the loss SixthSense Dec 2011 #17
The Republican smear machine was working overtime way before the election Major Nikon Dec 2011 #45
The Iranian hostage crisis. Adsos Letter Dec 2011 #55
I voted for Hillary in the Primary for exactly the reasons I feel Obama JCMach1 Dec 2011 #13
I would vote for Hillary over Obama at this point slay Dec 2011 #15
Hmmmm? ProSense Dec 2011 #23
I voted for Obama in 2008 and in the primaries - and he has been a total disappointment slay Dec 2011 #78
So you suspect HRC is behind the robocalls. That says alot. n/t lamp_shade Dec 2011 #16
. ProSense Dec 2011 #24
This message was self-deleted by its author SoDesuKa Dec 2011 #35
I think ProSense Dec 2011 #60
You cant call someone out to provide facts Charlemagne Dec 2011 #75
Since Hillary was raised republican, B Calm Dec 2011 #19
Think about what you are saying karynnj Dec 2011 #36
I disagree; I think you'll find many people who feel like this: muriel_volestrangler Dec 2011 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author SoDesuKa Dec 2011 #38
What I mean is your multiple personalities should argue among themselves muriel_volestrangler Dec 2011 #42
+1 nt MADem Dec 2011 #61
She isn't running. Not a worthwhile conversation. mmonk Dec 2011 #21
A person who isn't running could not possibly be "more effective" than one who is. baldguy Dec 2011 #22
Thank you. GoCubsGo Dec 2011 #25
uh yeah, NO. Schema Thing Dec 2011 #26
Ah jeez... WilliamPitt Dec 2011 #27
Pitt FTW n/t lapislzi Dec 2011 #32
This message was self-deleted by its author SoDesuKa Dec 2011 #34
Exactly what I thought. xmas74 Dec 2011 #46
This thread is an argument for the return of UNREC. MADem Dec 2011 #63
I doubt she would be.. 99Forever Dec 2011 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author SoDesuKa Dec 2011 #29
Not going to happen karynnj Dec 2011 #30
Stop. lapislzi Dec 2011 #31
Hillary just called to say how sweet A-Schwarzenegger Dec 2011 #33
This is a joke right? BootinUp Dec 2011 #37
Carl Rove thinks Hillary is the best thing the Democractic Party has. Life Long Dem Dec 2011 #43
This is really offensive and belongs in creative speculation cthulu2016 Dec 2011 #44
+1 MilesColtrane Dec 2011 #66
I'll rec...she's too hawkish for my tastes, but Obama has been a disaster... joeybee12 Dec 2011 #47
Hypothetical fantasy presidents are always better than reality. NYC Liberal Dec 2011 #48
Stir, stir, stir... one_voice Dec 2011 #49
Hillary is a TERRIBLE speaker Eliminator Dec 2011 #50
This thread has as much value as "Mothra v. King Kong" discussions alcibiades_mystery Dec 2011 #51
By far the best post in this entire thread! Kudos! onenote Dec 2011 #76
But she is never running for office again, so what's your point? MjolnirTime Dec 2011 #53
... CakeGrrl Dec 2011 #54
this is just the kind of thread meant to revisit old passions from 08 book_worm Dec 2011 #56
ofgs n/t librechik Dec 2011 #57
I cannot WAIT until CakeGrrl Dec 2011 #64
You have inspired me to start my campaign to draft Thomas Jefferson to run against Obama. MilesColtrane Dec 2011 #65
I'm mystified how Hillary improves the situation toddaa Dec 2011 #67
Apparently, this is the only way to CakeGrrl Dec 2011 #71
Motivate them to do what, exactly... Triangulate themselves? toddaa Dec 2011 #74
She improves it for the GOP looking for a Divide and Conquer wedge. Most of us aren't that stupid, MADem Dec 2011 #111
With all due respect Charlemagne Dec 2011 #68
I don't think I agree with this. dawg Dec 2011 #69
(cough) bullshit AtomicKitten Dec 2011 #70
Why is this even an issue? ohheckyeah Dec 2011 #79
Because Robert Reich wrote his daydream on the intertubes yesterday. CakeGrrl Dec 2011 #84
the daily dose of DU insanity cali Dec 2011 #80
Kinda like choosing between unflavored pablum and flavorless pablum. Two 3rd Way Democrats. Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2011 #81
I imagine you place much more faith in tea-leaves than I do. LanternWaste Dec 2011 #82
This is just nonsense. aquart Dec 2011 #83
It's silly to use Hillary to try to divide people against Obama gulliver Dec 2011 #85
reality check RainDog Dec 2011 #86
not a lick of difference MattBaggins Dec 2011 #87
You must think she's a highly manipulative, disloyal, & dishonest person. Bucky Dec 2011 #88
Total bullshit LiberalFighter Dec 2011 #89
True. Second term Obama depends on 2012 and 2014 Congresses. treestar Dec 2011 #92
This message was self-deleted by its author SoDesuKa Dec 2011 #94
This message was self-deleted by its author SoDesuKa Dec 2011 #93
Total Troll Botany Dec 2011 #95
And why should anyone believe that Hillary would be LESS likely rocktivity Dec 2011 #97
You make a good point. bluestate10 Dec 2011 #104
Bullshit. Lil Missy Dec 2011 #90
Did something just go running through here? tjwash Dec 2011 #91
YAWWWWWWWWN DeathToTheOil Dec 2011 #96
Hillary has said she will NOT run for elected office in the future, she's retiring ... Tx4obama Dec 2011 #98
OH NOOOO! Not this again . . . nt mistertrickster Dec 2011 #99
Hoo boy...... marmar Dec 2011 #100
She isn't running. eom tledford Dec 2011 #105
Thanks for all the hard work on our behalf. Ikonoklast Dec 2011 #107
comedy gold. Warren DeMontague Dec 2011 #110
lolsnort Lord Helmet Dec 2011 #112
A difference in style and "face" is meaningless and probably counterproductive TheKentuckian Dec 2011 #113
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #54