Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jp11

(2,104 posts)
40. She is noted as 1 of 5 possible 'co-hosts' in the only tiny article theorizing what may happen.
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 05:05 PM
Jun 2012
http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2012/06/msnbc-to-test-toure-at-pm-sources-126414.html

I personally hate when she is on more than Michael Steele as I find she makes more snide comments while grinning like an idiot about how clever she is with whatever RW talking point she is pushing. I also see fewer pundits on with her putting her crap down or correcting her, I feel they are letting her off easier than say Michael Steele would be if he had said the same thing.

I also on a more personal level find her disingenuous based on her claims she is an 'atheist' who 'aspires to be a person of faith'. Basically when I first saw her appear on my TV she claimed to be an atheist and would still take up the republican religion side on issues then toss in 'But I'm an atheist' as if to make her point MORE valid.

I truly hope MSNBC doesn't go further down the road with more shows that try to sustain the 'both sides do it' or some semblance of 'fair and balanced' by bringing in more republican/conservatives to give their spin on things. If people wanted that crap they'd be watching CNN.

MSNBC has one show where the republican viewpoint gets to be droned on to us and it happens in the morning with Joe it REALLY REALLY doesn't need another one. Ratigan wasn't perfect and often failed to correct many 'both sides do it' BS or even propagated it but I felt he was more neutral MOST of the time. When he was spouting that crap there was USUALLY some call for it to be true like money in politics although the truth would be to point out how more pervasive it is on the republican side yet he didn't say so.

frees up an hour of teevee time for me. spanone Jun 2012 #1
For me too. I was hoping they'd give Bahir 2 hrs. southernyankeebelle Jun 2012 #9
I wont watch her DearAbby Jun 2012 #2
She's gonna be drinking a tall cup of fail. theaocp Jun 2012 #3
Speaking of S.E. Cupp legs, I've always wondered... Jamaal510 Jun 2012 #50
when I see S.E.Cuppthis comes to mind : Rectangle Jun 2012 #63
now YOU are going to pornify her? because she is attractive and wears glasses = librarian seabeyond Jun 2012 #4
Yeah, I'm giggling. madashelltoo Jun 2012 #13
"going to twist every issue and I refuse to watch her." no. that is not the issue. you diverted seabeyond Jun 2012 #14
Oh, you think I'm pornifying her because she wears glasses madashelltoo Jun 2012 #16
then say she is fake, connecting her wearing glasses to librarian porn, is.... connecting seabeyond Jun 2012 #18
Okay . . . it's time to end this because madashelltoo Jun 2012 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author Whisp Jun 2012 #52
Librarian porn? WTF are you talking about? Hassin Bin Sober Jun 2012 #26
it is in the op, dont know why you are on my ass. seabeyond Jun 2012 #28
Jesus christ on a trailer hitch the OP said NOTHING about porn. Hassin Bin Sober Jun 2012 #30
Some people just see porn everywhere zappaman Jun 2012 #41
Am I missing something? I don't see where she made a porn connection. dmr Jun 2012 #32
"librarian look" now equals "librarian porn?" WolverineDG Jun 2012 #48
The word porn never appears in the OP ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jun 2012 #35
Pornify her? msanthrope Jun 2012 #21
yes, fox news did. she ollowed their instruction. we know fox. and the OP did too. seabeyond Jun 2012 #23
While Fox News is slimy, I do not think the 'legs-on-desk' schtick is anything other than Ms. Cupp's msanthrope Jun 2012 #24
at the end of the video she made a comment that sounded as if fox told her to seabeyond Jun 2012 #27
She says nothing of the kind, seabeyond....kindly post what you claim is msanthrope Jun 2012 #33
The OP did not. RoseMead Jun 2012 #44
crickets RainDog Jun 2012 #66
The issue is she's a right-wing liar and a fraud who has no business on MSNBC ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jun 2012 #37
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Jun 2012 #49
Wow. Wow. Wow. Wow. 2ndAmForComputers Jun 2012 #59
Huh? ohheckyeah Jun 2012 #65
I didn't like Ratigan but I will asjr Jun 2012 #5
They are pushing her as an "acceptable" Ann Coulter and that won't work. swayne Jun 2012 #6
Here is a list of potential (highly qualified) candidates: Dawson Leery Jun 2012 #7
She's Co-Hosting... KharmaTrain Jun 2012 #8
They are going to team them up? magnifisense Jun 2012 #20
"Rotating Hosts" KharmaTrain Jun 2012 #34
Rotating hosts with rotating heads aint_no_life_nowhere Jun 2012 #39
I would appreciate if MSNBC would take this opportunity to make a "Crossfire" program swayne Jun 2012 #10
She's very physically attractive, no doubt about it aint_no_life_nowhere Jun 2012 #11
She is very weak. I agree. LiberalFighter Jun 2012 #43
Who's the other possibility? You say she's "one of two..." No link? n/t jenmito Jun 2012 #12
She is annoying! why her? hrmjustin Jun 2012 #15
why? gotta prop up the GOP SoCalDem Jun 2012 #17
MSNBC jumped the shark whey they let Keith go. magnifisense Jun 2012 #22
Sippy Cupp is a right wing shill, nothing more. JoePhilly Jun 2012 #25
Sippy Cupp!! KamaAina Jun 2012 #29
Stephanie Miller calls her that ... JoePhilly Jun 2012 #31
Sippy Cupp... That is just beautiful! LadyHawkAZ Jun 2012 #56
I love Stephanie :) Whisp Jun 2012 #58
Careful now.... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jun 2012 #36
It's time to give CURRENT TV a serious look now that this has happened bigdarryl Jun 2012 #38
why not stop paying for cable news to pipe propaganda into your home? RainDog Jun 2012 #67
She is noted as 1 of 5 possible 'co-hosts' in the only tiny article theorizing what may happen. jp11 Jun 2012 #40
I will not watch Sarah E Cupp. She is one. LiberalFighter Jun 2012 #42
Good idea. They need to know we'll boicot flamingdem Jun 2012 #46
I was hoping they would give that spot to Karen Finney. I love her. jillan Jun 2012 #45
How about the brilliant Chris Hayes as another alternative flamingdem Jun 2012 #47
My vote would go to Joy Ann Reid aint_no_life_nowhere Jun 2012 #51
+1. I love her insight! nt ecstatic Jun 2012 #54
agree, lately I really like her flamingdem Jun 2012 #55
From MSNBC footinmouth Jun 2012 #53
This message was self-deleted by its author AJTheMan Jun 2012 #57
Well, they're never going to reconsider that by reading through here. calimary Jun 2012 #60
Nicely said. n/t Laelth Jun 2012 #61
Ratigan impossible to replace watchdogg Jun 2012 #62
I sure as hell won't be watching, can't stand her. Why can't they give Ron Reagan a show?? Cass Jun 2012 #64
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»S.E. Cupp one of two to r...»Reply #40