Reply #28

In the discussion thread: White House probably knows outcome of health care case before Supreme Court. [View all]

Response to kenny blankenship (Reply #25)

Sat Jun 16, 2012, 03:58 PM

magical thyme (4,068 posts)

28. +a billion

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

35 replies	Author	Time	Post
White House probably knows outcome of health care case before Supreme Court. [View all]	michaelcobb	Jun 2012	OP
No one knows	dsc	Jun 2012	#1
Separation of Powers?	longship	Jun 2012	#2
Would a heads up be impeachable?	SoutherDem	Jun 2012	#7
How would they ever prove it?	michaelcobb	Jun 2012	#8
how on earth would that be even remotely considered an impeachable offense?	unblock	Jun 2012	#10
Collusion, or interference would be impeachable	longship	Jun 2012	#15
there's nothing "colluding" or "interfering" with the someone at the supreme court	unblock	Jun 2012	#16
The "heads up" never, ever happens.	longship	Jun 2012	#17
people don't understand this because you're making it up.	unblock	Jun 2012	#18
The tradition is because of the separation of powers	longship	Jun 2012	#20
a heads up from the court is to the saturday night massacre as a tap on the shoulder is to murder	unblock	Jun 2012	#22
Fine. Cite an example.	longship	Jun 2012	#26
we're getting way off topic, but here are some examples:	unblock	Jun 2012	#34
I agree	longship	Jun 2012	#35
How is advanced notice of a decision an abuse of power?	Ruby the Liberal	Jun 2012	#24
First, SCOTUS doesn't leak.	longship	Jun 2012	#27
That you know of.	Ruby the Liberal	Jun 2012	#30
I am glad you agree that there's no evidence for leak claims	longship	Jun 2012	#31
Conspiracies?	Ruby the Liberal	Jun 2012	#32
Madam Speaker seems pretty confident.n/t	monmouth	Jun 2012	#3
I am not even trying to forecast	SoutherDem	Jun 2012	#4
How does it "sound to" you?	FarLeftFist	Jun 2012	#5
Love it. Being Republican means never being wrong.	michaelcobb	Jun 2012	#6
This message was self-deleted by its author	unblock	Jun 2012	#9
The W.H. can probably guess, like we can. The ct is 5-4 conservative. It has voted	Honeycombe8	Jun 2012	#11
I would disagree about that.	kenny blankenship	Jun 2012	#25
+a billion	magical thyme	Jun 2012	#28
You're being too logical. Conservatives are against the mandate...	Honeycombe8	Jun 2012	#33
Thanks MIRT! And I didn't even alert:	freshwest	Jun 2012	#12
I see that you have not survived the powers of MIRT.	MineralMan	Jun 2012	#13
Anthony Kennedy is not just a conservative but an arch-conservative	TheKentuckian	Jun 2012	#14
The mandate isn't the only means to fund the other provisions	Shrek	Jun 2012	#19
probably? that's your assertion?	spanone	Jun 2012	#21
My hope is that the mandate was the contentious part	GarroHorus	Jun 2012	#23
Are you talking about the Supreme Court who selected Bush as President?	lunatica	Jun 2012	#29

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.