Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)
30. Ah but there you go.
Sat Jun 16, 2012, 02:00 PM
Jun 2012

It takes only a tiny sliver of imagination to see that the first use of the Armed Drone will be scrutinized. The second will be less so, and after three, or four, nobody will notice. Much as TASERS are used today. In the 1980's Taser use was very carefully examined by the press and those with oversight. Today, the Police zap a man or woman and they die, well, it's unfortunate, but you know, we had no choice and we followed policy.

POLICY. That is going to be the trick. After it's first use there will be policy governing it's use. Some radical nut job like David Koresh that even the Repugs want to shut the hell up will be first. Somebody with a bomb on a bridge, next to a school bus load of nuns and orphans. Imagine the scene, I can. Then along comes the magic drone, disabling the baddie and preventing him from slaughtering the poor orphans and those saintly Nuns.

Can't you hear the arguments? Can't we all agree that in extreme circumstances where the lives of innocent children are at risk we should be able to use the drone. If you oppose, well you want children and women to die don't you?

Next thing you know, every police officer will have a drone hovering nearby, originally to show the court the actions of this sainted defender of the weak and helpless. Now it's armed with a rubber bullet, tear gas, taser, and in the case of a riot, a belt fed machine gun.

Wait, because I am old enough to remember the Liberals of the 80's telling everyone that nobody would really be dumb enough to let the cops have TASER's and pretend they were non lethal. I remember when nobody thought the cops would ever be given a metal nightstick, the wood was bad enough wasn't it?

So why wouldn't they get a terminator drone to protect us from all those scary dangers we are too sheep like to question.

What Could Possibly Go Wrong? tularetom Jun 2012 #1
Nothing Could Go Wrong William deB. Mills Jun 2012 #20
they call it collateral damage. zeemike Jun 2012 #25
could also be that they have read the intel on climate change and know roguevalley Jun 2012 #55
If you aren't a terrorist, you have nothing to fear. Or a protester. Or black. Or a woman. Or ... DirkGently Jun 2012 #31
What could possibly go wrong with officers having guns? treestar Jun 2012 #73
You mean what has gone wrong with officers having guns, tasers, and billy clubs. JoeyT Jun 2012 #78
Vote Ludite. xtraxritical Jun 2012 #81
Never thought I'd see a DEMOCRAT cheering for a police state. Zalatix Jun 2012 #88
So this is Chief Deputy Randy McDaniel's personal wish list. randome Jun 2012 #2
Denials, all the way up to the very end. Zalatix Jun 2012 #54
Do you see how easily dotymed Jun 2012 #93
a very progressive person I know is okay with drones because... grasswire Jun 2012 #94
If history is any indicator, dotymed Jun 2012 #96
Before anyone (Sid) can LOL at RT, here is another source: morningfog Jun 2012 #3
I can see the increased sales of RC Jun 2012 #5
But it means you always have to be watching. zeemike Jun 2012 #26
+1000 n/t Indi Guy Jun 2012 #50
I think this should be a sporting affair, so I'm leaning towards spud guns Kennah Jun 2012 #59
Right. Good thinking on the parabolic mike and infrared. daaron Jun 2012 #71
This is Chief Deputy Randy McDaniel's wish list. I doubt he'll get what he wants. randome Jun 2012 #8
What makes you doubt he'll get what he wants? What is the basis? morningfog Jun 2012 #68
This is why The Lord hath given shotguns unto us . Webster Green Jun 2012 #4
I'm sure a shotgun would be really effective against a drone aiming at a crowd of innocent people. JDPriestly Jun 2012 #49
This combined with very high charges for parade and demonstration permits will chill speech. JDPriestly Jun 2012 #6
You know, LEGALLY, the police have the right to hover a mini-armed drone over every protester. Poll_Blind Jun 2012 #11
sooooooooo true. Vattel Jun 2012 #19
The solution is obvious: take the humans out of the equation DavidDvorkin Jun 2012 #7
Yeah, what could possibly go wrong? Wounded Bear Jun 2012 #10
Careful, human! DavidDvorkin Jun 2012 #35
"Drone blew up the Occupy protesters' car in self-defense!" Poll_Blind Jun 2012 #9
Ah, perfect....a drone "Stand Your Ground" law... Wounded Bear Jun 2012 #12
After all, if police dogs are counted as police, why not unmanned drones? Poll_Blind Jun 2012 #13
Yup, you've been warned. And you better stay off that drone's cloud! freshwest Jun 2012 #45
your tax dollars at work. limpyhobbler Jun 2012 #14
if obama can do it, why not your local crimina...umm police dept nt msongs Jun 2012 #15
We are becoming the new fucking East Germany. Vattel Jun 2012 #16
Vattel Diclotican Jun 2012 #65
Very quickly. dotymed Jun 2012 #75
To what extent shall expediency or efficiency outweigh rights? malthaussen Jun 2012 #17
with this current supreme court, unconstitutional is out of the question spanone Jun 2012 #18
Oh goody.... emilyg Jun 2012 #21
Keeping in mind, local police departments are subject to elections and local pressure bhikkhu Jun 2012 #22
Ah but there you go. Savannahmann Jun 2012 #30
You're reading my mind lunatica Jun 2012 #37
Unless it's done just to Occupy protesters. Zalatix Jun 2012 #89
An enterprising individual could develop drones and robots HooptieWagon Jun 2012 #23
I had the same thought. zeemike Jun 2012 #28
Yes, it it is also possible HooptieWagon Jun 2012 #32
Soon to become highly illegal in our police state lunatica Jun 2012 #38
Deceptive headline. MineralMan Jun 2012 #24
It is what the sheriff wants, and is working for. morningfog Jun 2012 #53
The headline is still deceptive. MineralMan Jun 2012 #72
It may be a bit premature. "To get" is not "will get" or"are getting". morningfog Jun 2012 #74
Police need to wake up and stop wanting these things... Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel Jun 2012 #27
I'm glad I'm not the only one that sees this as a problem jp11 Jun 2012 #29
Congress launched the campaign for broader use of drones siligut Jun 2012 #33
Here we go Meiko Jun 2012 #34
It makes one wonder why they think these weapons are necessary lunatica Jun 2012 #39
Its usally the cops that incite the riots... HooptieWagon Jun 2012 #46
Precisely... n/t Indi Guy Jun 2012 #58
OK, now I am concerned. Will have to examine this carefully. nt stevenleser Jun 2012 #36
What did you discover? n/t Indi Guy Jun 2012 #91
Nothing yet. Haven't started to research. nt stevenleser Jun 2012 #92
It is time to end the lionizing of those in uniform(those who protect the powerful). Dawson Leery Jun 2012 #40
What happens if they go wrong and attack us? Rosa Luxemburg Jun 2012 #41
"They" Oneka Jun 2012 #64
So if the 'terrorists' get a hold of them? Rosa Luxemburg Jun 2012 #80
Ever notice how these are the only kinds of things we're #1 at anymore? Marr Jun 2012 #42
These are a little dated, but - RC Jun 2012 #43
Wow, that's depressing woo me with science Jun 2012 #76
And what is worse now, is that the stats are worse. RC Jun 2012 #82
Looks like the "armed drones= tinfoil hatters" crowd owes an apology. Zalatix Jun 2012 #44
Our tax dollars return home at last. 'I, for one, welcome our new robotic overlords...' freshwest Jun 2012 #47
I've got one thing to say felix_numinous Jun 2012 #48
I predict Detroit will receive the first shot. sarcasmo Jun 2012 #51
What did we say when the idea of drones here first came out???? REMEMBER????? dixiegrrrrl Jun 2012 #52
We are looking at four more years of growing the police state, woo me with science Jun 2012 #56
Move along, nothing to see here. Zax2me Jun 2012 #57
Q: ~ Where are our progressive reps on this?... Indi Guy Jun 2012 #85
"Terminator" coming to a neighborhood near you. ErikJ Jun 2012 #60
It's understandable given the number of vaginas in the country Kennah Jun 2012 #61
excellent point - they are an unruly lot rurallib Jun 2012 #67
Skynet is People My Friends! solarman350 Jun 2012 #62
Freedumb! Freedumb! Freedumb! blkmusclmachine Jun 2012 #63
Indi Guy Diclotican Jun 2012 #66
The resemblence is interesting isn't it... Indi Guy Jun 2012 #84
Indi Guy Diclotican Jun 2012 #86
Yeah, it seems that sci fi has a way of finding its way into reality... Indi Guy Jun 2012 #90
somewhere in a dark basement surrounded by Cheetos, Frank Luntz and Assoc. rurallib Jun 2012 #69
Yes. Maybe the "Neighborhood Watch Officer". Drones are people too. nm rhett o rick Jun 2012 #77
OK, this is pretty fucked up. And dangerous for both the people and cops. Here's why --> daaron Jun 2012 #70
Imagine the wolves Sarah can get with one of these! n/t cyberpj Jun 2012 #79
Fucking A. lonestarnot Jun 2012 #83
'Drones over America. Are they spying on you?' ~ From The Christian Science Monitor... Indi Guy Jun 2012 #87
This will be the last one though right? 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #95
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Drones Over US to Get Wea...»Reply #30