Reply #24

In the discussion thread: 24-hour poll: Does DU need judges as well as juries? [View all]

Response to Occulus (Original post)

Fri Jun 15, 2012, 08:52 AM

Javaman (40,599 posts)

24. What's the point of having a judge? we might as well have mods back. Stay with the juries.nt

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

52 replies	Author	Time	Post
24-hour poll: Does DU need judges as well as juries? [View all]	Occulus	Jun 2012	OP
Yes -	DURHAM D	Jun 2012	#1
If you don't trust juries, why trust judges?	boppers	Jun 2012	#2
It would be nice to have a tiebreaker	Warpy	Jun 2012	#3
i thought the author of the op	XemaSab	Jun 2012	#4
I think it encourages people to vote more carefully	EFerrari	Jun 2012	#13
Three trolls sat on a jury.	Occulus	Jun 2012	#14
How often does that happen?	EFerrari	Jun 2012	#17
I'm not certain that is an answerable question	Occulus	Jun 2012	#18
+1	Little Star	Jun 2012	#33
There is no such thing as a tied or hung jury on DU	RC	Jun 2012	#23
what would the judges do	limpyhobbler	Jun 2012	#5
Add an extra 1,000 whiny threads a day to Meta. n/t	johnnie	Jun 2012	#9
YEP	Little Star	Jun 2012	#34
Ha, ha...good one.	WorseBeforeBetter	Jun 2012	#48
verdict notwithstanding	Occulus	Jun 2012	#11
That would be MIRT and admin.	pintobean	Jun 2012	#52
There are no mods on DU3, only forum hosts and juries (and admins)	Electric Monk	Jun 2012	#6
smartass	Occulus	Jun 2012	#7
The admins are the judges; this is their private courthouse.	MADem	Jun 2012	#8
Why not go for the trifecta?	agent46	Jun 2012	#10
We already have those.	Occulus	Jun 2012	#12
Yes	Son of Gob	Jun 2012	#15
And a Hung Jury!	Common Sense Party	Jun 2012	#21
Hit It!	Son of Gob	Jun 2012	#22
We already have them. They're called admins.	gkhouston	Jun 2012	#16
Too many moderators on DU2 moderated with their pet cause front and center	Sen. Walter Sobchak	Jun 2012	#19
The moderators' job was to determine whether an alerted post broke the rules as they were written.	Rhiannon12866	Jun 2012	#45
And some did it poorly,	Sen. Walter Sobchak	Jun 2012	#46
Well, I was a mod and I never saw that.	Rhiannon12866	Jun 2012	#49
I would have voted for a tie-breaker option. A 3-3 ruling goes to a tie-breaker.	Kalidurga	Jun 2012	#20
What's the point of having a judge? we might as well have mods back. Stay with the juries.nt	Javaman	Jun 2012	#24
+1	ProfessorGAC	Jun 2012	#26
no	Little Star	Jun 2012	#37
brilliant retort.	Javaman	Jun 2012	#40
Well my skin is pretty thick...	Little Star	Jun 2012	#41
Put down?	Javaman	Jun 2012	#43
No, the system isn't perfect	davidpdx	Jun 2012	#25
"the one particular OP"	Occulus	Jun 2012	#29
I don't know about the spat of bad decisions	davidpdx	Jun 2012	#31
And then there's my own experience first thing this morning,	Occulus	Jun 2012	#32
And next...	greytdemocrat	Jun 2012	#27
We call those Admins n/t	Occulus	Jun 2012	#28
+1	Little Star	Jun 2012	#38
Only when the jury doesn't agree with me.	FSogol	Jun 2012	#30
They need me to hunt down and banish disruptors	Kingofalldems	Jun 2012	#35
DU juries sometimes make bad decisions. So would judges.	slackmaster	Jun 2012	#36
YES SIR RE BOB!	Little Star	Jun 2012	#39
Is it really ok to use a jury to censor opinions that fly in the face of the community?	davsand	Jun 2012	#42
Aren't the admins the judges, the final arbiters here?	Rhiannon12866	Jun 2012	#44
This message was self-deleted by its author	Tuesday Afternoon	Jun 2012	#47
No Juries, No Judges at all	KatChatter	Jun 2012	#50
+1	Shrek	Jun 2012	#51

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.